youreavinalaff
-
Posts
5,250 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by youreavinalaff
-
I do have something. As pointed out several times.
-
Thus, confirming my point. Thanks.
-
Keep up. I've already corrected myself.
-
You've been doing questionnaires for 40 years. That's great. Now. You said "usually".
-
I don't have a tinfoil hat. The world is round. Can't walk off. Other than that, your post makes perfect sense.
-
No. I've never said that. I don't understand why you don't post from source. To busy accusing people of having nothing, I guess.
-
I used to have a WP with Non O. There are advantages. Your permission to stay is not tied to your job. Should you lose your job, want to quit or change jobs, it's a lot easier as you don't need to leave the country or visit immigration.
-
I have never said they are not. I merely pointed out Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. As us confirmed by most educational institutions banning students from citing Wikipedia in their work.
-
I do have something, as pointed out numerous times on numerous threads.
-
Does it state the demographics? If not, I won't bother.
-
I don't bother reading links to Wikipedia, for reasons already stated.
-
It's not. I'm wondering why you did not link to the sources cited. That would make your claims more plausible.
-
I've got some exiting news. Anyone can edit Wikipedia without citing a source. Therefore, content cannot be confirmed as fact.
-
So, in this particular poll what was the age band, employment status, area of UK, political thinking, sex, financial situation, education background of those polled?
-
Indeed there is a footnote. Well done. However, Wikipedia, by name, is a site that can be edited by anyone with out linking to any factual source. I know how you like a link. I'm surprised you used a source that cannot be backed up.
-
I don't recall them confirming the demographics. Please link to them so I can take a look. Thanks.
-
OK. So, as reported in the Guardian.
-
I could quite easily do a poll and get opposite answers. Those taking out opinion polls carefully choose thier audience. That way they get the answers they want. I believe your link showed a poll of 2132. That's just over 2000. Citing Wikipedia is just plain silly.
- 244 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
-
-
Just over 2000 polled. Not a clear majority of Britons. A majority of those polled, by the Guardian, at an unknown location, of an unknown age, background.........the list goes on.
- 244 replies
-
- 17
-
-
-
-
-
-
Oh dear. I guess you have proof of such claims.
-
Actually, the poster said "most ARE fake". He didn't say "most will be found to be fake." Most definitely a Hamlet moment.
-
She wouldn't from you. Remember this; "If anyone had told me that these Isaan women were like this I’d have avoided them like the plague."
-
If that is the way you speak to the locals, no wonder they don't understand.
-
Do you really think there is a link between low IQ and believing the earth is flat?
-
You know what "assume" does?