youreavinalaff
-
Posts
5,118 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by youreavinalaff
-
People want single minimum wage for the whole country – NIDA Poll
youreavinalaff replied to webfact's topic in Thailand News
As someone who has lived and worked in Thailand for over 20 years, I would say I have plenty of knowledge. -
People want single minimum wage for the whole country – NIDA Poll
youreavinalaff replied to webfact's topic in Thailand News
Unions? No threat in Thailand. Labour Debt? No threat either. Overtime? No. Staff turnover? Staff won't leave. No other options. -
People want single minimum wage for the whole country – NIDA Poll
youreavinalaff replied to webfact's topic in Thailand News
It won't make any difference. Large companies, if forced to pay more on salaries, will increase hours, cut any breaks staff might get and impose stricter targets. I know of a restaurant that used to let staff stay in a house adjoining the place free of charge. When minimum wage was last increased, the house was then charged at 2000b a month. -
Nice bit of right wing propaganda there. Sadly, for you, it's flawed.
-
Either she didn't or it was pre 2004. Either way, not much use to today's discussion.
-
Do you have a VOA or are you on a visa exempt? What is your nationality?
-
You are correct. You don't have to back up opinions. However, you made an incorrect statement. I just trotted off to do as you asked. Here you go. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/
-
I'll explain once more. 24% is not "most". That is incorrect. It is one of your beliefs.
-
It's called conversation. You'll get it one day, but probably not if the conversation goes against your, incorrect, beliefs.
-
24% was in response you your "most". Perfectly relevant.
-
No, I don't. Nice, selective quoting, BTW.
-
24% of applications rejected last year. UK government intelligence is going to be more than a match for migrants arriving as most of them do. 24% is not " most".
-
One person who " used to process asylum claims". She must have worked very hard to have checked all of them.
-
That is why they apply.
-
Can't prove what? They are asylum seekers. They can certainly prove they've made a claim
-
You've now changed what you wrote so much, I agree with you.
-
It was tongue in cheek. Take a day off being so serious.
-
Something else that needs to be checked. I have done several 60 day extensions without my wife present.
-
For a start, not all are in hotels. A small number may be in 4 star hotels, or at least what were 4 star hotels until the owners allowed the government to take over. Also, it's asylum seekers not illegals. Not all receive payments. Those that do certainly are not on social security.
-
The government have already said the final details are yet to be announced. Maybe your idea, or a variation, will be included. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67705178
-
It's really not quite that simple, is it? It's views like that which have forced the government's hand. Although I disagree with the size of the hike in requirements, I understand that it's propaganda like above that creates tensions.
-
Your first response was " In other words, you've got nothing.". Not an analysis. You subsequent response to me was an opinion.
-
Defamation?
-
You can get a 60 day extension at immigration. Documents required are usually; your passport, copy of marriage certificate, copy of wife's house book and ID card. Some offices may want an up to date KR2.
-
Your opinion against his. If he has nothing, so do you.
