youreavinalaff

As usual, Starmer says he has a plan but gives no details. He must be confused. Still adamant he won't seek to rejoin.

Not the ones I've been too. My brother in law often returns with thousands. It's big business. Last time I went was in Khampengphet. Lots of shiny pickups with registration plates showing many had traveled a fair distance. This one didn't get raided. Local police had been informed and paid to stay away.

I doubt it. He seems confused on most issues.

Seems we all believe the same as your mate Starmer. If he believed you, he would make sure it was part of his election campaign. Imagine that, on just one policy he has the majority of the electorate, apparently. Oh wait, he hasn't done it. That suggests he is concerned of a negative impact such a move might make.

Are they really? I hope, for his sake, Starmer's wife doesn't find out. ????

I agree. Seems to be all Starmer and his cronies are doing. He was in my old home town the other day. Talking to students about university fees. He's going to make them all free. Decided not to tell how, when or where the money is coming from. A couple of days later Rayner was saying how they can't make promises about any spending. Left hand and right hand.

So you want it both ways. Why didn't you say from the start?

If it were so important and detrimental to the economy as you suggest, Capt Hindsight would be using re-joining as part of his election campaign. He has already said he won't be but will be tackling the cost of living. So, Brexit is linked to cost of living under the currents government but Labour will be able to miraculously make things all rosey without mentioning it or doing anything about it. Have Starmer and Raynor been taking lessons from Penn and Teller?

It must also be linked to Brexit, the topic of this thread, otherwise it's off topic and should have a thread of it's own. A popular view amongst certain posters.

I've looked through and can see nothing about bribes or pimping. Just because one culture is different to another it does not make it wrong.

I have. Nothing about re-joining the EU. If, like you say, there is so much support for it, Labour would be jumping all over it. They know it would be detrimental, so they don't mention it. Strange how "cost of living" is on your list, something that is constantly linked to Brexit by you, yet you feel no need for Captain Hindsight to mention it in the run up to the election.

The general election is due in a year. If Labour win they get 5 years. I'm sure you'll agree they need to be given their full term to attempt what you have posted. If the naysayers piped up after 6 months, saying Labour haven't done what they promised, supporters like your self would be up in arms. No crystal ball. Simple mathematics. 5+1=6.

Such an out pouring of support for rejoining, apparently, yet Labour will not commit for fear of throwing a spanner in the works at the next election.

6+ years.

With the amount of uturns he, Raynor, and shadow cabinet members have made, the amount of " we'll see" comments and the amount of " we can't spend money we haven't got" comments, I would have to say, I think your crystal ball needs a polish.

My point is, if the bride to be truly loves the guy, she will have a bit of a haggle. My wife did exactly that. Nicely and fairly. It was agreed a village party would be wasting money that could be spent on more important things at a later date. We've been married 23 years. I have a very good relationship with in laws and my wife and I have the freedom to spend on what and where we want. As apposed to others who sow the seeds by paying big dowry.

Dowry should not be between in-laws and the groom. It should be between all parties. The question has to be asked, does she love him? If she does, she should either speak to her parents about the amount, just tell them nothing will be paid and go ahead or just tell them they'll live together and sign names in the registry office, NO PARTY. All of which should get a result. If the bride to be won't do any of the above, well.............................

Yes, you are right. I should have said " the one that injured the governor. Probably just as well he didn't die. If he had he would have been forgotten in the shadow of the death of the more illustrious JFK.

I read this as there are now 2 bullets. The one that ended up killing the governor was on his stretcher. The one found in the car on JFK's stretcher.

Did you name yourself after the Cafe or did the Cafe name itself after you?

Just like UK did decades ago before it was realised mental health issues can be diagnosed and treated. Thailand, as a whole, is still in that era. Whether it's dementia, schizophrenia, bi polar, autism, etc. Whatever the age, people suffering with such are left in the community and expected to live a normal life, untreated. If a crime is committed or they are deemed a nuisance to society, they will be locked up with no treatment. Thailand needs to move forward on this. First stop is parents needing to understand and accept their kid is different to other kids and might need help.

https://news.sky.com/story/jfk-assassination-magic-bullet-theory-cast-into-doubt-by-ex-secret-service-witness-12960275 This article, along with many others, disagrees. The whole point of the new memoir appears to be to disprove what is in the article. Possibly, at the same time, adding weight to your theory.

I believe the theory all along was that a single bullet killed JFK and injured the other guy in the car. With the revelation in the article, there are now 2 bullets.

A large majority of Thai students receive 12 years free education. A licence issued by KSP does not ensure all teachers have had a similar level of training and education. A teacher from Phillipines or Nigeria, as examples, can obtain a teaching licence from KSP in Thailand. I doubt they would have had the same level of education and training as someone with a 4 year Uni degree from a Western country. Thai teachers also need a licence. Education levels in Thailand is also a moot point. How can many Thai teachers be licenced to teach English when they struggle to hold a conversation in English?

It must be. He spelt it one L but 2 Ps.