Jump to content

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,954
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by josephbloggs

  1. I get the same error as the OP
  2. It won't be missed if it is permanent. Sad shadow of it's former self.
  3. You could say the opposite is more the US/Boeing wanting it to be pilot error rather than reality. Both equally speculative. But because of the RAT deployment (if true but the evidence looks compelling as it is at the moment) then definitely looking more like a mechanical / engineering issue.
  4. But neither of those would explain the RAT being deployed as it seems like it was. All speculation though but that is pretty well thought out and presented in the video above. If the RAT really was deployed then it's looking more like an aircraft problem than human error.
  5. Never had you down as a leftist, but you do seem to be very familiar with what the homosexual community is up to. It's OK in this day and age so just be yourself and enjoy whatever you enjoy.
  6. It's an opinion, not a fact. And a very biased opinion at that,
  7. Where do you come up with this rubbish?
  8. That is a good point. I don't understand how people can be so willingly blind. They literally can't bring themselves to critice him in any single way, and if anyone else does they do one of two things: go on the attack and go "whataboutwhataboutwhatabout". In the UK I support Labour. But I am quite happy to criticise them when necessary and have no issues with critcising Starmer when I think he's wrong. That's surely normal and healthy?
  9. This is interesting. Apparently the RAT was deployed which would indicated loss of power (electrical, hydraulic or engine) and would also explain why the landing gear wasn't retracted. And, according to a 787 mechanic, here are all the conditions that would automatically deploy the RAT (any one of them): • Loss of all engines • Both engines are at less than minimum idle RPM (Revolutions Per Minute) • Loss of all hydraulic power - left, right, and center systems detect low pressure • Loss of all electrical power • BPCU (Bus Power Control Unit) detects loss of power to C1 and C2 TRU (Transformer Rectifier Unit)s • On approach, loss of all four EMP (Electric Motor Pump) hydraulic pressures and loss of either the left or right flight controls ACE (Actuator Control Electronics) • Rotor burst on takeoff that causes loss of both PECS (Power Electronics Cooling System) primary cooling loops.
  10. Finally it dawns on you. So that means we can now criticise Trump without being called a Biden-loving, men-in-women's-showers promoting, illegal immigrant supporting terrorism fan? Welcome to the real world, I am glad you finally arrived.
  11. Doesn't matter. I said it's a comical country, now you want to know so you can criticise mine? Do you feel the need? You snowflakes are so touchy. Criticisms, emojis, everything.
  12. What a comical country.
  13. They are compared to the alternatives at a similar price point. I've ridden in loads over the years (probably 30-40 Uber rides in Dubai for example) and they feel cheap and flimsy inside.
  14. I hope nothing like this ever takes off (pardon the pun). Imagine the noise of all those giant drones buzzing around.
  15. And yet you wish her and her parents would be captured? Your parents must be so proud.
  16. You don't think perhaps they were busy?? You want them to be having a conversation with ATC when they are desperately trying to save their lives and those of all on board (and on the ground)? They are trained to concentrate on flying before communication - that is the last priority in an emergency. What the hell are you on about with throat slitting, electromagnetic attacks and Chinese nonsense? Have some respect and get a grip of yourself.
  17. It's a stupid argument and you know it is. I could just as well ask how how much CO2 there would be if it wasn't for her? It's just as stupid. Is that really all you have? Can't bear to admit that she might be doing a teeny bit of good among the young (non-old man bitter right winger) generation? Is she only allowed to have one cause?
  18. I didn't have to wait long before another comment did I @Yellowtail. Criticising her looks and wishing she had been taken hostage, even wishing her parents would be taken hostage. See what I mean? Sick, bitter, nasty men, triggered by a 22-year old girl. Absolutely disgusting.
  19. I am not going to track through your entire post history to see if you ever commented on her looks, her disabilities, her character. I just know I see those unjustified personal attacks on her all the time on here, and always by the same bunch of posters of a similar ilk. I can't keep track of which nasty old man said what. That's why I said "if you haven't done that then I apologise", and I mean it. If you never have then I exclude you from "you guys". I already listed her achievements in response to you comment that she's never done anything. Don't try and shift the goalposts and play semantics, it is very dull and I am not going to join in. I listed her accomplishments, and for any 22 year old they are mightily impressive, no?
  20. Oh dear. I said "all you guys" meaning the right, I see so many posts of people mocking her looks, her hair, her disabilities - there is one just above calling her a "retard" for heavens sake. If you personally have never done so then I apologise for including you in the "you guys". But unquestionably the right do pick on those things, this forum is full of examples. I don't lie, I just say things you disagree with. And if and when I am wrong I apologise. That's what bigger people do.
  21. Never done anything??? Did you spark a movement of millions of students as a 15-year old? Have you spoken at a UN conference as a child? Have you addressed DAVOS? Spoken at COP? How many Nobel Prizes have you been nominated for exactly? Have you ever been Time Person of the Year? Have you had several books published? Have you raised millions of dollars and given it away? All by the time you were 22? I'm guessing you classify me as "left". I actually find her quite irritating and a little naive. However I admire that she follows her convictions and is genuinely sacrificing to try to affect change no matter how futile it may be. A principled young lady doing what she believes in. The fact that she triggers all the bitter old right wing men is hilarious - that's what I admire most about her. And all you guys criticise her disabilities, her looks, feel so threatened by her. It's quite pathetic. "What has she ever done". Jeez. What you you ever done except sit behind your keyboard and slam a 22 year old girl?
×
×
  • Create New...