josephbloggs

Yep, I've decided only to reply to you in the same mannar you reply to everyone else - vague nonsense and never ever answering a direct question. Fun isn't it not having to come up with anything ever? Labour went 14 years without power. Your chums had 14 years in power to fix the problem yet did nothing. Why? They had 14 years to fix the NHS yet did nothing (except handily people blamed immigrants for GP wait times, woo hoo - a scapegoat!), they promised to give £350m a week extra after Brexit yet did nothing. Why? Labour have inherited 14 years of mess and nothingness and are still discovering all the holes. They inherited a backlog of 100k asylum seekers which your chums pretended didn't exist, and are now dealing with it. You expect small boat crossings to stop in four week yet didn't complain at all when your chums did absolutely nothing about it in 14 years. The hypocrisy is massive.

Your chums had 14 years to do something yet did nothing (except literally give away hundreds of millions of pounds to Rwanda). Why?

He also mixes up his black people in his made up stories: https://x.com/stuzi_pants/status/1823254636871950477

Of course! Labour's fault for the 4 weeks or so they've been in power and also the 14 years they weren't! Brilliant.

Good question. What should they have done in four weeks? Any concrete ideas? What was the Tories plan in four weeks? (And why didn't they do anything in 14 years) What was Farage's plan in four weeks? What is Yaxley-Lennon's plan in four weeks? What were their long term plans? Not just to "stop the boats". What were their actual plans, how were they going to carry them out, how were they going to pay for it? Details of actions. All ears. I am sure you have tons of detail on the three above, so what were they planning? Never heard detail from Farage or Yaxley so maybe you know something? Actual details of an actual plan? Any idea?

Yeah, they heard about that three and a half weeks ago or so in Syria, Iran, all the other brown places, had a discussion with their family, got their money together then decided to cross the entirety of mainland Europe on land, find a trafficker, pay them, organise a dinghy, sail across. Victory! All of that in less than a month. Glorious migrants!! That Rwanda plan was working so perfectly before it was scrapped. Cheap too. Damn.

I just completed this quiz. My Score 50/100 My Time 87 seconds  

Oh wow, stop being such a snowflake. Who even checks their emojis? Who cares?? You seem obsessed with them.

Here's the thread of my experience as I initially had trouble, then I found the solution and updated the thread. In case it helps: Feel free to ask for any other help, as someone who has fairly recently only done this for the first time (and I got good advice here) I am more than happy to help.

Not true. It can be done online, I did my first one online fairly recently (on behalf of my wife who technically owns our home). It's pretty simple to do. Just try and do it quickly as it is supposed to be done within 24 hours of your arrival, and setting up your wife to be able to register guests can take a day or so for approval if I remember correctly. Once that part os set up the reporting is easy but can only be backdated by 24 hours from the date you actually do the report.

I know one poster is busy researching how many generations he has been in the UK. We know "immigrant" and "second generation immigrant" is bad / not British, he's probably not sure if "third generation immigrant" is pushing it a bit. Maybe if it turns out he is a fourth generation immigrant it'll be ok to acknowledge the heroics as he can be considered "one of us". Let's see. For now, silence.

Trying to help you be more coherent and make it easier for people to follow the threads, next time I won't bother. But I think Will B Good hit the nail on the head anyway, what difference would it make as it is mostly gibberish.

Here he comes. What is "forceful"? I'm trying to help as I can't follow his posts or who he is talking to - it is obvious he doesn't know about the quote button. But whatever.

Here's a genuine helpful tip for you. When there is a post you want to reply to, under the post there is a button that says "quote". Press this then type your reply, then we know who you are replying to. Currently there just a load of random posts from you and I have no idea who you are talking to or which post you're replying to.

Very gracious of you to concede defeat. Was it the brown Muslim sounding guy saving the white kid from a stabbing that did it for you?

Pretty sure you won't see him over there - I guess he is just busy.

Do you read the actual stuff you post? Obviously not, or you would have noticed two things. The first was in bold right at the top of your link. 1. That this is the first time it has ever happened - it was right there in the first sentence of your post which claimed I was wrong for saying it has never happened (And, shock horror, under a Labour government). 2. It happened in French territorial waters, the British coast guard and RNLI rendered assistance to the French in French waters. The French coast guard rescued most of them but a British ship saved another 13 and took them ashore. Why would they bring them out of French territorial waters, cross the channel then bring them ashore in the UK? Your post is meaningless - it doesn't even make any point at all.

So Darryn Frost shouldn't have been lauded for his actions to help overpower the London Bridge attacker? Would you agree with that? Or should we only publicly applaud white heroes? What are you saying exactly?

Can we debate like adults please, don't be childish. Because I disagree with racism, thuggery, and attacks on law abiding businesses, law abiding communities, and setting fire to hotels full of people that means I am a supporter of illegal immigration. Come one, let's be sensible. They don't get "turned back" on the spot (although obviously - according to James105's crystal ball - Farage would be out there personally towing them back to sea if only his party had won the election and absolutely none would be reaching our shores, and no one would be drowning). How many have their asylum claims rejected? In 2023, 33% were refused at initial decision (not counting withdrawals). The annual refusal rate was highest in 2004 (88%) (er, Labour government), and lowest in recent times in 2022 (24%) (er, Tory government). The bold is my commentary. Link: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/#:~:text=Not all asylum applications are,times in 2022 (24%).

Ah, "second generation immigrant" is the new dehumanising term. "Immigrant" doesn't work for you because he isn't one, so it's now "second generation immigrant". Just keep on dehumanising and shoe-horning people in to your nice little generic categories. How far do you want to go back? WIll you looking for "third generation immigrants" next to justify your prejudices? And what about the white boy who killed 14-year old Nathaniel Shani with a machete? Have you looked in to his immigration status - where was he from originally, what about his parents and grandparents? Oh and he wasn't named for legal reasons as he is a minor. I don't remember see you lot asking questions about the secrecy there, or coming out on to the streets to "protect our children" - because that is what it's all about, right, the children? Technically I am a second generation immigrant as my dad arrived in England as a 15 year old. I was born in Southport, I am white, I have an "English" name. That must be troubling for you....

What a sick post really.

He must read some really out there conspiracy sites, that's all I can say - some of his claims are beyond ludicrous.

I literally have no clue what you are on about. As someone else said recently, you are barely coherent these days. Are you talking about Farage? And what do I believe? Certainly not a single word that leaves his frog-like face.

Been polishing your crystal ball again? Farage, the man who rarely bothers turning up for any official parliamentary business (he'd rather be out grifting) would have sprung in to action and stopped all small boat crossings in four weeks............if only more people (er, a LOT more) had voted for his party. Got it.

They would have got in based on all the other reforms and pledges they made, they didn't need to include the "big one" in their public pledges, in my opinion.