Jump to content

klauskunkel

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    13,363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by klauskunkel

  1. K just for curious sake... suspected weapon used ? blink.png a video camera footage evidence as to what actual weapon was used wouldnt stand up in any court surely without any other evidence...... no forensics mentioned either... please tell me theres more than footage from vid camera to identify the exact gun used as the murder weapon ... please.

    Erm... Where in the report does it say that the video footage was what the police used to identify the weapon?

    They did however say the video footage was used to identify THE SUSPECT.

    'The investigators said they were confident that they had nabbed the gunman after viewing footage from security cameras more than 20 times'

    Do you not understand that sentence????

    Ballistic fingerprinting is going to be the obvious evidence to identify the gun. The suspect also admitted to owning said weapon.... I think this one is signed sealed and delivered.

    Good try to embellish doubt into it though. Pity we saw through it quickly.

    BTW.... tough luck about it not turning out to be PDRC on PDRC murder on the orders of Suthep.

    That's what the red heads were praying for... unfortunately, logic and truth prevails and so far it is all looking like 28 UDD to 0 PDRC in the murder stakes.

    Can't wait to hear the name of the politician this tosser is connected with.... I doubt it is Suthep.

    What planet are you on ? whos we saw through what ? give over son and stop getting hysterical.

    The investigators said they were confident that they had nabbed the gunman after viewing footage from security cameras more than 20 times. They said the killer was 20 metres away.

    Surakrit was three metres from Suthin while he was shot.

    So the killer was 20 meters away yet they also say Surakrit whos admitted owning the gun allegedly used was only 3 meters away... yup ballistic forensics will be able to say theres a difference of 17 meters for sure. There is no mention of that proof as yet, just a supposition. You do know the difference right ?

    Seeing as critical thinking seems not to be your strong point heres the point you missed

    Surakrit cant have been both 20 and 3 meters away at the same time... so which is it Einstein 3 ... 20 ....or .... which is entirely possible here.... just another bad and self contradicting newspaper report...

    Do me a favour and drop your football scorecard rubbish...I couldnt care less who the murderer is/was playing for... i do like to see logic used though and this news article just contradicted itself rather widely.

    Now had you tried to point out that its possible that Surakrit may have been the owner but clearly another used it being at a different distance away and they could be connected, I may well agree thats very possible, in fact id say its highly likely... IF its proven to be the weapon used ...but as usual ya forgot to use critical thinking and logic and went straight for the political rant... nice one son facepalm.gif

    1. the killer shoots the victim from a distance of 3 meters

    2. then he runs away (as killers are fond to do) and the security camera records him at 20 meters distance, when he passes.

    3. the OP never says that the security camera recorded the killing.

    (btw. this is just the way I interpret this thing, take it or leave it)

  2. As always when something bad happens for a Thai institution the first statement was to blame an outside company. When that backfired, they come up with a generalized "solution" (total ban on alcohol sales for all and sundry), designed to reroute the blame, as opposed to caring for and doing their job properly (revise procedures, enforce policies, accept blame and create measures). These people are only concerned with their faces, not with their mandates and responsibilities. In another article the SRT governor said, he understood how the victim's family felt because he has also a daughter. Well, does your daughter take the train, or the SRT chauffeured company car?

    If the victim had been a farang...I shouldn't be going there...

    • Like 2
  3. "No one gave me information about it at all. I just started working here for over a year, so I have no access to information about what happened 10 years ago."

    sniff...,"this was supposed to be an easy position, nobody said anything to me about difficulties...how could I know...what would I have done if I knew...this is very complicated and it makes my brain hurt...I want to go home and play Facebook..." sniff, sniff, whine, whine

  4. However to cut costs of holding a nationwide referendum, they said it could be held by unconventional methods, such as allowing people to give feedback at convenience stores.

    Yay, 7/11 to the rescue, again...first, report a crime at 7/11, then book your flight at 7/11, now hold reform referendum at 7/11. Should have bought stock in that company years ago. It is surely by now classed as an essential and protected service, without which Thailand could not function...just like Facebook... giggle.gif

  5. As for foreigners procuring children for the "begging business", Ake would call a meeting of police units including the Anti-Human Trafficking, Marine, Immigration and Tourist police to launch operations in accordance with the NCPO policy.

    Foreigners again, huh? No Thais doing this, huh?

    • Like 2
  6. I am quite surprised by these stories, one minute calling for an armed struggle and burn down BKK and once in jail they turn into mother Teresa

    This story is similar to the one about the guy released from the Cambodian nick, reading that it sounded like they had locked up Gandhi...

    Maybe because they couldn't use Facebook, Skype, Twitter anymore and thus their chain of command was cut and they had to actually directly communicate with a live person...

    • Like 2
  7. "What it says is that it's right that justice should be done and that no one is above the law - as I've always said."

    "What it says is that if you commit a crime and you get caught and it gets publicized to the extent that we can't control the damage, then justice should be done and no one is above the law - as I've always said."

  8. As the sellers commonly share their flight information with customers to gain their trust, Customs hopes to use that information to arrange arrest on their arrival.

    Ahem, I'm not too sure, but did they just publicly give away the one strategy they have? There is kind of a sweet innocence behind such a behavior, inadvertently sabotaging a plan that took so much creativity, technical knowledge, and interdepartmental cooperation to conceive, and then one guy in the team, usually the main guy, blurbs it all out to the press in order to look like a creative, tech genius and team player...

    Now those sellers will not share their flight info so easily...

×
×
  • Create New...