Germans content with national direction ahead of vote - survey

[Scott]

Inflammatory posts and those from questionable sources removed along with replies.  

 

Suspensions will now be awarded.  

[katana]

18 hours ago, ilostmypassword said:

Replacement Migration: 
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?

 

"United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union)."

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

 

MONSTROUS!  Clear proof that the UN is behind the recent migrations! Japan and Germany must unite once again to fight this threat!

It's claimed the immigrants are needed due to Europe's low birthrate and it's justified in this way. This is ridiculous.
Why don't European countries don't just increase child benefit payments which was done previously? There is a long history in Europe of using the tax and welfare system to modify social behaviour eg after World War I, many countries were left with dwindling populations. In an attempt to solve this problem, Sweden began a program called "family allowance". These were government funds given to families with children to encourage them to bear more children and increase the birthrate.
In the UK after World War II, bringing up several children was encouraged to restore the birth rate: in 1945, Family Allowance was introduced in the UK to provide benefit for second and subsequent children.
Instead the powers that be have invited half the male population of the Middle East into Europe to live on benefits with what seems to be the intention of creating some new continent of Eurabia.

[simple1]

3 hours ago, katana said:

It's claimed the immigrants are needed due to Europe's low birthrate and it's justified in this way. This is ridiculous.
Why don't European countries don't just increase child benefit payments which was done previously? There is a long history in Europe of using the tax and welfare system to modify social behaviour eg after World War I, many countries were left with dwindling populations. In an attempt to solve this problem, Sweden began a program called "family allowance". These were government funds given to families with children to encourage them to bear more children and increase the birthrate.
In the UK after World War II, bringing up several children was encouraged to restore the birth rate: in 1945, Family Allowance was introduced in the UK to provide benefit for second and subsequent children.<snip>

Times have changed, Australia had a fairly recent policy to provide additional welfare to encourage increases in birth rates, was not a success; fair amount of abuse of the system by the poorer sectors of anglo society.

[bert bloggs]

5 hours ago, simple1 said:

Times have changed, Australia had a fairly recent policy to provide additional welfare to encourage increases in birth rates, was not a success; fair amount of abuse of the system by the poorer sectors of anglo society.

'A fair amount of abuse of the system by the poorer sectors of the ANGLO society." oh you do make me laugh , of course the Immigrants and those of a certain faith only work hard and have one child .

[simple1]

1 hour ago, bert bloggs said:

'A fair amount of abuse of the system by the poorer sectors of the ANGLO society."

oh you do make me laugh , of course the Immigrants and those of a certain faith only work hard and have one child .

Of course there would be some from the Muslim heritage community, but they only represent approx 2.5% of the Australian population. The largest percentage of related child welfare fraud emanates from single parents. Accordingly where do you think the vast majority of child welfare abuse originates - hint, it is not the Muslim community.

 

 You're forever posting far right talking points and then denying you support / sympathise with the far right - LOL

[joeyg]

5 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Of course there would be some from the Muslim heritage community, but they only represent approx 2.5% of the Australian population. The largest percentage of related child welfare fraud emanates from single parents. Accordingly where do you think the vast majority of child welfare abuse originates - hint, it is not the Muslim community.

 

 You're forever posting far right talking points and then denying you support / sympathise with the far right - LOL

Wrong. http://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-do-refugees-cost-australia-100m-a-year-in-welfare-with-an-unemployment-rate-of-97-54395

[ilostmypassword]

6 minutes ago, joeyg said:

Wrong. http://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-do-refugees-cost-australia-100m-a-year-in-welfare-with-an-unemployment-rate-of-97-54395

Did you actually read the article? It said one claim was false and the other unverifiable. It certainly does not support what you contend.

[simple1]

10 minutes ago, joeyg said:

Wrong. http://theconversation.com/factcheck-qanda-do-refugees-cost-australia-100m-a-year-in-welfare-with-an-unemployment-rate-of-97-54395

Not discussing refugees, but  further welfare support for citizens to encourage increased birth rates.  One assumes the poster who raised this thought bubble would wish to exclude Muslim heritage citizens - LOL

Edited September 10, 2017 by simple1