JAG Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Everyone thinks the Iconic Toblerone is Swiss because of its shape - just like the Alps. Actually the only reason it is triangular is because if it was square it wouldn't fit in the box! Is that my taxi? No need to see me out .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 52 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said: lmao ! Whey solids. Yes. A dairy component.that used to be dumped in rivers or given as free pig food. Then the discovery that it could be legally used as the base component of many things such as " Icecream" or "Protein" body building supplements. Even with its inclusion "Ice cream" is a deceptive misnomer for Frozen Confection. Depends on what product you're talking about. If you look at the ingredient labels for the premium, non-Thai, imported ice creams sold here, they typically have actual CREAM and/or milk as the first/main ingredient. Those ice creams are actual ice cream. If you look at the labels of the Thai local brands, you'll find plenty of palm oil, sugar, glucose and various other chemicals. But the closest they typically come to having any milk or cream is the infamous whey solids you mention above. When I buy and want to eat ICE CREAM, I DON'T want some chemical infused jumble of whey solids, palm oil and sugar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonmarleesco Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Should there be ANY set standard for toxic content in food products? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said: Depends on what product you're talking about. If you look at the ingredient labels for the premium, non-Thai, imported ice creams sold here, they typically have actual CREAM and/or milk as the first/main ingredient. Those ice creams are actual ice cream. If you look at the labels of the Thai local brands, you'll find plenty of palm oil, sugar, glucose and various other chemicals. But the closest they typically come to having any milk or cream is the infamous whey solids you mention above. When I buy and want to eat ICE CREAM, I DON'T want some chemical infused jumble of whey solids, palm oil and sugar. You are right. Premium imports mostly do have genuine whole milk content. Even so I have never seen one that contains such at the minimum content of 40% which used to be the descriptive standard for genuine icecream. It is the majority of the content that I object to in either product which are actually similar. Many chocolate products are also similar in using extract waste derivatives in excusive description of genuine content. " Food Technology" is a very profitable business in selling the world garbage now. Not for lack of real food content but in the interest of profiteering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jofa Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 In a country where all(!) batteries are dumped in trash bins or directly in the nature. Check Rice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouAreBananas Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Defamation laws seems to work only FOR Thais... But you can shame foreign companies even if nothing happened Bananas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 16 hours ago, tokyoblond said: Did I miss something here? The "amounts of the two toxic substances detected are within the set standards". Doesn't that mean that there is no story? 16 hours ago, Cadbury said: So if the chocolates are within the set (EU) health standards then what is the point. But Ms Saree Ongsomwang got herself in the news. That was probably the point and the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 12 hours ago, eefoo said: Didn't we have a post recently where 16 or so Thai registered airlines were found to be in breach of safety regulations, but they couldn't be named. Chocolate companies, who haven't done anything wrong, apparently, can be named. What's wrong with this sketch .....? The hub of double-standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aslimversgwm Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 16 hours ago, champers said: The truth is out. A KitKat puts lead in your pencil. A tasty alternative to those blue tablets. Love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacko45k Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 16 hours ago, tokyoblond said: Did I miss something here? The "amounts of the two toxic substances detected are within the set standards". Doesn't that mean that there is no story? Sadly it doesn't mean there is no lead or cadmium. It is a bit like the standard of acceptable levels of rat droppings in potato chips....zero works for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxcorrigan Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 17 hours ago, Cadbury said: So if the chocolates are within the set (EU) health standards then what is the point. To quote: "Since there is no set standard for chocolate products in Thailand, she suggested that Thailand adopts the standard of the EU regarding cadmium which will come into force in the next two years". So if Thailand has no standards for chocolate what is she implying apart from muddying the names of respected manufacturers? Anyway they will adopt the EU standards in two years time. Can't rush these things! Thai bureaucracy at it's finest. You're just upset because they left Cadbury out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAIBKK Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Fake chocolate !!! They use cadmium and lead to increase the weight of the chocolate bar so they have to use less chocolate... Don't Thai to me !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbagwill Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Many expats extoll the \values of Thailand not being a "nanny state" - one of the problems is that 1 - there is no reliable system to check food and confectionary products 2 - In the absence of this manufacturers will take advantage of this and cut corners in production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhunBENQ Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 It's not rocket science to check where your product was made. The Lindt brand that I depicted is of course made in Switzerland. It's true that a custom/known brand name does not garantuee where it was made. Most of the chocolates /candy sold here are from the big global players which produce at whatever location fits best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhunBENQ Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 16 hours ago, xerostar said: These two sound a bit dodgy .. Lotte Ghana Black Chocolate Extra Cocoa Lotte Ghana Extra Cacoa Black I wonder if Nigeria makes chocolate too ? Nothing dodgy. Ghana is a country in West Africa, nothing to do with Nigeria. Good chocolate contains a substantial amount of cocoa. Cocoa is expensive compared to fat and sugar. Now you can think what cheap chocolate/candy is made of. Ghana is one of the most important cocoa exporters. Even highly dependent on cacao. So the label just suggests that cacao from Ghana is used. Nothing particularly "special" I guess. My coffee is "Guatemala", roasted in Germany Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikosan Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 I have read this correctly haven't I? They have no standards for chocolate here, they are thinking of introducing the EU standards in 2 years? So this is a none story and they should get their <deleted> sued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 22 hours ago, Lingba said: The fact that toxic anything is even allowed regardless of the level is ridiculous The fact that the human body contains trillions of microorganisms — outnumbering human cells by 10 to 1 - shows we don't live in a perfect world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonah Tenner Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said: On a related topic, I was reading the labels on the local Snickers chocolate bars sold here in Thailand, and oddly, they're manufactured and imported from China. That was the end of me ever eating Snickers bars in Thailand. Too much plastic? Edited October 5, 2017 by Jonah Tenner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slip Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 20 hours ago, ratcatcher said: From the OP- Quote The ten brands of dark chocolate products which were tested with cadmium substance include ...Nestle Kitkat Chocolate, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Next stop NK Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 10/4/2017 at 4:12 PM, tokyoblond said: Did I miss something here? The "amounts of the two toxic substances detected are within the set standards". Doesn't that mean that there is no story? Or maybe - as often the case in Thailand - they are trying to expose certain brands as being bad for you - and they happen to work for a competitor. Not sure this is the case here, can we trust them to be impartial when even judges and police in Thailand are also easily boght off? They should rather focus on making some standards or apply/copy those from EU, so they they can start find really / more problematic products Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace of Pop Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Cadmiumbrys Milk Tray , very yummy..![emoji481][emoji481]?Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ace of Pop said: Cadmiumbrys Milk Tray , very yummy..!? Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Hmmmm. Palm oil content from plantations grown on landfill ...( cemetary for those all annoying old rechargeable batteries). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiea Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) On 10/4/2017 at 4:10 PM, Cadbury said: So if the chocolates are within the set (EU) health standards then what is the point. To quote: "Since there is no set standard for chocolate products in Thailand, she suggested that Thailand adopts the standard of the EU regarding cadmium which will come into force in the next two years". So if Thailand has no standards for chocolate what is she implying apart from muddying the names of respected manufacturers? Anyway they will adopt the EU standards in two years time. Can't rush these things! Thai bureaucracy at it's finest. there is no safe amount of lead , it is just how fast or slow you want to get stupid . low IQ abound here . and thai peeps do love their chocolate . Edited October 5, 2017 by mikiea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiea Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 9 hours ago, mikosan said: I have read this correctly haven't I? They have no standards for chocolate here, they are thinking of introducing the EU standards in 2 years? So this is a none story and they should get their <deleted> sued. not a non story .... telling you eating Thai chocolate makes you stupid if laced with lead . it is not allowed in paint why would it be allowed in chocolate ? any amount of lead makes you stupid . jeeeeze ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugocnx Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 10/4/2017 at 4:17 PM, Lingba said: The fact that toxic anything is even allowed regardless of the level is ridiculous Even fruits contain some alcohol. Some stuff comes with products. That's the way it is. Is salt forbidden? Is it good for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadam Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 From the full story on ThaiPBS: Quote Ms Monrudee Po-in, a nutrition expert of the foundation, ... recommended consumers to be cautious when consuming chocolate products. How exactly should one be cautious about eating chocolate? Should we smell it before eating? Should we eat "only a little bit"? Non-story, non-advice. This study was published so that the government people can appear to be doing something to earn their wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puipuitom Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 4-10-2017 at 11:17 AM, Lingba said: The fact that toxic anything is even allowed regardless of the level is ridiculous Then do not consume ANY milk, as all milk on this planet contains D.D.T. Same for rice: all contains aflatoxin. ( very, very littlebit, as if much, the rice grains discolour, loose shininess, add deforms, which are - for the far majority - will be filtered out by sortex systems. But.. 100 % clear... does not exist.) Same for corn, wheat, peanuts, and all tree nuts. So, stop eating ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargeezr Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Another good reason to avoid the Thai chocolate and candy and stick to alcohol. Time for another good beer. Geezer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) I read recently that Queen Elizabeth loves dark chocolate, the darker the better. I wonder if she heard this bit of news. In the US chocolate is allowed to have a certain amount of "rat droppings" because hell, those darned things are everywhere. This was first allowed around 1970. Cynical minds (ahem!) suspect that the manufacturers intentionally fulfill the allowed amount because it is probably the cheapest ingredient. If you want a reason to avoid Hershey's chocolate products... Edited October 5, 2017 by bendejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruffian Dick Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 10/4/2017 at 2:12 AM, tokyoblond said: Did I miss something here? The "amounts of the two toxic substances detected are within the set standards". Doesn't that mean that there is no story? It means, "ooh, be scared and buy my newspaper." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now