Put the retirement extension up to 2,000,000 baht with no option of monthly combination.  That should reduce the percentage of elderly folk in Thailand overall. 

 

Stop a lot of the whining here too. 

 

55555

I'll set-up a hotline for the wives and girlfriends; the 30 Second "Wam, Bam, Thankyou Mam" performance must leave them really frustrated.

The least we need on earth is more people. Enough people are refugees because of overcrouding. Governments should do their homework to solve the change in age structure and not solve it by producing more people.

Young Thai men, like everyone need no encouragement to 'hump'. The problem is that they often clear off when the girl is pregnant and very few Thai men are interested in her after having her one child. 

Sala bums will spawn even more sala bums..

15 hours ago, shady86 said:

They should aim for quality, not quantity.

That may  prove difficult

I can offer a white and poison/diseases-free genetic, in exchange for a permanent visa. Interested, send your pictured resumes by PM   

Best solution is to emancipate the children from their parents. Make parents have no legal obligation to raise or support their offspring. Raise all the children in secularcommunes; this will eliminate all crime. poverty, drug addiction, homelessness, child abuse etc.

 

The west needs this model even more. It is just the village system on an organized level but since the villages have been broken up we need a new system.

 

The nuclear family is a disaster. Children need many other brothers and sister to socialize with and a few wise mentors to guild them.

Edited January 17, 20188 yr by Allen Ginsing

Just not with your own kids!!!

19 hours ago, kotsak said:

Yes, make more kids but don't run away afterwards!

Oh, I was about to make myself available to procreate. :-(

At least every xmas I go to the orphanage and throw lollies over the fence and yell out  " Merry xmas son".

8 hours ago, Allen Ginsing said:

Best solution is to emancipate the children from their parents. Make parents have no legal obligation to raise or support their offspring. Raise all the children in secularcommunes; this will eliminate all crime. poverty, drug addiction, homelessness, child abuse etc.

 

The west needs this model even more. It is just the village system on an organized level but since the villages have been broken up we need a new system.

 

The nuclear family is a disaster. Children need many other brothers and sister to socialize with and a few wise mentors to guild them.

Sounds like a Kibbutz..

Edited January 17, 20188 yr by kotsak

Just lead to more Thai men sowing their seed, abandoning their female partners with more mothers living in dire poverty or supported by other family members struggling to bring up their kids. Probably one reason why the beerbars will never be short of female staff available for takeaways, as in many cases it`s the only way they can support themselves and their children. And so it`s a merry go round.

16 hours ago, Jeremy50 said:

Why? The place is overrun with damn kids, schools everywhere you look, and all of them packed to overflowing. The environment is a disaster, and the roads are becoming increasingly clogged with traffic, even in rural areas.

12 hours ago, hhinhh said:

The least we need on earth is more people. Enough people are refugees because of overcrouding. Governments should do their homework to solve the change in age structure and not solve it by producing more people.

Yup.  The problem with these "we need more kids to pay taxes when the current generation gets old" claims (besides the attitude of bringing people into the world for your financial gain) is that then that generation gets old and they need another larger one to support them.  And then another larger one to support *that* generation.  Meanwhile the population keeps growing exponentially and at what point does it become unsustainable?

 

(They do it in the U.S., too.  "Oh the baby boomer generation is so big, we need LOTS of people in future generations to pay into it and support them!"  Where does it stop?)

 

And I assume that all of these tax breaks and financial incentives given still cost less than just using that money to care for "the aging population," right?

Suppose that is better than what UK MP Ben Bradly posted...

 

Quote

 

A Conservative MP has apologised for a 2012 blog post in which he suggested benefit claimants should have vasectomies.

In the post Ben Bradley, made Tory vice-chairman for youth in last week's reshuffle, hit out at what he called a "vast sea of unemployed wasters".

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42712180

 

Tax incentives for having two or more children are being doubled

 

Yes, because we all know how many Thai men pay income tax.