He is blackmailing  the doctor...no doubt about it...they got to him....Russian hookers for Doc Holiday too ?

10 minutes ago, tonray said:

He is blackmailing  the doctor...no doubt about it...they got to him....Russian hookers for Doc Holiday too ?

I don't think it's that. My guess is that doctor like everyone else that deals with trump and wants to keep in his good graces is fudging the BMI obesity reality in order to make trump happy. Kind of a Dr. Feelgood kind of thing. Wouldn't want to announce the truth and raise his blood pressure. 

 

trump requires PRAISE and LOYALTY as much as he requires cheeseburgers and TWO scoops of ice cream for dessert. 

 

Speaking of his diet, it's been reported that the only restaurant trump has ever eaten at in D.C. as president is his own hotel's restaurant. That in what is now one the best restaurant cities in the country. 

 

trump's bizarre psychiatric and unsophisticated dietary needs are not at all hard to figure out. Witness how the Chinese played him on his state visit there. 

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by Jingthing

On ‎1‎/‎17‎/‎2018 at 9:00 AM, Jingthing said:

Prosecutors take note.

Thaivisa legal eagles take note, prosecutors won't need to as he is not under investigation for anything.

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by Just Weird

On ‎1‎/‎17‎/‎2018 at 11:37 AM, Jingthing said:

Indeed. He follows the president's orders in more ways than one.

Think about this ethically.

Doctors don't normally make long term predictions about your fitness for stressful work many years into the future, especially if you're already old. 

This "doctor" also said that if trump had a better diet and exercise regime he could live for 200 years.

He has sunk his credibility with that comment. 

Only the extremely inadequate would think that it was meant to be taken literally and that it would have any effect on the doctor's credibility.

58 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Good idea to not bother communicating. We have no common ground. But if you actually think this is stalking, you don't know what stalking is. 

At one time it was called a secret admirer.

 

Its a joke

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by USPatriot

3 minutes ago, USPatriot said:

Sounds like a threat, If your going to stalk me, ill give you my address.... ill make it easy.

1600 Pennsylvania Ave by any chance ? 

On ‎1‎/‎17‎/‎2018 at 12:27 PM, Jingthing said:

No doctor knows the fitness of an old man with risk factors (overweight, high cholesterol) seven years in the future. So, I think, actually he did lie, and as he lied about that, it calls his entire ethics into question. 

So you know what his cholesterol level is?  Where did he express an opinion about Trump's health in 7 years time?

21 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Uh oh. Second opinion:

 

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/01/17/trump-heart-disease-health-medical-exam-gupta-newday.cnn

...from a doctor employed by the no credibility CNN who has not examined him!  And you try to accuse the Whitehouse doctor of a lack of credibility!

 

It was also stated that the risk of heart issues for Trump was low.  Funny how his detractors didn't mention that.

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by Just Weird

Just now, Just Weird said:

...from a doctor who has not examined him!  And you try to accuse the Whitehouse doctor of a lack of credibility!

I don't need to be a doctor to gauge that Kim is fat and Trump is overweight.  It's Trump's mental fitness that's more important.  Again, a person doesn't have to be a psychiatrist and interview the dufus directly - to ascertain some of his wackiest mental problems.

 

Here's a test:  If you had young daughters, let's say ages 11 and 14 and 16....would you trust Trump to babysit?

32 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

Thaivisa legal eagles take note, prosecutors won't need to as he is not under investigation for anything.

'.....not under investigation for anything.'

 

Have you been in a hermetically sealed cabin on Baffin Island for the past 20 months?

7 hours ago, Jingthing said:

 

In any case, this formally respected doctor has done major damage to his own credibility with this report especially in the context of the facts presented by Doctor GUPTA. 

Gupta hasn't examined Trump!  The  Whitehouse doctor is still formally respected, except  by you, it seems, what are you talking about?  Aren't you concerned about your credibility as it's disappeared down the drain?

22 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

I don't need to be a doctor to gauge that Kim is fat and Trump is overweight.  It's Trump's mental fitness that's more important.  Again, a person doesn't have to be a psychiatrist and interview the dufus directly - to ascertain some of his wackiest mental problems.

 

Here's a test:  If you had young daughters, let's say ages 11 and 14 and 16....would you trust Trump to babysit?

I didn't address that to you and I don't care what you think that you don't need to be.  Kim?  Who's that?  What are you going on about?

 

About your test, yes, why wouldn't I?  You next accusation should be interesting.

30 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

Gupta hasn't examined Trump!  The  Whitehouse doctor is still formally respected, except  by you, it seems, what are you talking about?  Aren't you concerned about your credibility as it's disappeared down the drain?

Gupta has his numbers.

 

Next ... 

11 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Gupta has his numbers.

 

Next ... 

That's all he has and if that was all that was necessary to make an accurate, credible diagnosis we'd never need to see a doctor, but we do.

 

What do you mean by the cocky "Next"?  That makes it sound as if you answered the questions...you didn't.

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by Just Weird

12 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

That's all he has and if that was all that was necessary to make an accurate, credible diagnosis we'd never need to see a doctor, but we do.

 

What do you mean by the cocky "Next"?  That makes it sound as if you answered the questions...you didn't.

Gupta's medical background is very impressive.

If you're suggesting he would broadcast his conclusion that trump has HEART DISEASE without credible evidence, I can't take your posts any more seriously than the hair brained idea that a 71 year grew in height.

Being a fierce trump partisan is anyone's right, but that does not trump facts and reality. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanjay_Gupta

 

Edited January 18, 20188 yr by Jingthing

49 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Gupta's medical background is very impressive.

If you're suggesting he would broadcast his conclusion that trump has HEART DISEASE without credible evidence, I can't take your posts any more seriously than the hair brained idea that a 71 year grew in height.

Being a fierce trump partisan is anyone's right, but that does not trump facts and reality. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanjay_Gupta

 

So what if he has an impressive background, he still hasn't examined Trump, has he? 

 

Did you also miss on the very clip that you posted that he agreed with the opinion that Trump was low risk as far as heart issues were concerned?  Maybe you should pull your neck in a bit.

 

You can't take my posts seriously?  Gosh, what a slap in the face that was, how will I ever get over that?

I invite others to watch the video. "So the president has heart disease. Those numbers qualify for him having heart disease and clearly needs a plan to try to prevent some kind of heart problem down the road."

He's been given a plan but it's already clear trump won't exercise and has an anti-exercise philosophy. So it's down to his compliance on diet.

The numbers don’t lie, if, in fact, the President is overweight perhaps he can look at gastric bypass surgery - the obese crowd seem to back the procedure.

There is no denying he has done a great job so far for Americans, second term will be a breeze

 

8 hours ago, tonray said:

1600 Pennsylvania Ave by any chance ? 

I edited my post

2 hours ago, bartender100 said:

There is no denying he has done a great job so far for Americans, second term will be a breeze

 

Trump will stay fit for a second term... no risk of burn out

Off-topic post and replied removed.  

On 17/01/2018 at 11:49 AM, Jingthing said:

I noticed on Fox they're squawking about a press question about his WAIST SIZE. I don't think that was released. Actually WAIST SIZE is very relevant to health as height/weight from BMI doesn't tell us anything about where the fat is. Fat concentrated around the waist is particularly troublesome. 

It is almost impossible to be in perfect health with the waist size we see in that picture. 

There is no denying he has done a great job so far for Americans, second term will be a breeze
 

Translation - - there is plenty of denying. His approval ratings are under water.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

It is almost impossible to be in perfect health with the waist size we see in that picture. 

There is a new movement about this called the Girthers.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

11 hours ago, Just Weird said:

I didn't address that to you and I don't care what you think that you don't need to be.  Kim?  Who's that?  What are you going on about?

About your test, yes, why wouldn't I?  You next accusation should be interesting.

I mentioned Kim (he's NK's leader) being fat - as a way to assert that:  A person doesn't need to be a doctor in direct contact with a patient - in order to gauge certain things - which can be obvious from even a photo, or a video of a person walking. 

 

If I see a pic of a person with deep lines in his face and a balding head, I don't have to be a doctor to ascertain that person is old. 

 

Similarly, when I see videos of Trump waddling to and fro with his fat butt, I don't need to be a doctor to realize he's overweight.  When I hear from various sources that he eats junk food and drinks diet coke all day, I can gauge that he's a stupid man who is harming his health.

 

When I hear and read about things he says and tweets, I can ascertain he's an ill-informed  dummy who is harmful for America.  I don't need a framed psychiatry diploma on my wall to deduce that.  Neither do I need to do an in-depth personal interview with the rude idiot.  I've been on this planet for well over half a century.  I have the ability to gauge people on basic levels - as, I assume, you do also.

6 hours ago, boomerangutang said:

I mentioned Kim (he's NK's leader) being fat - as a way to assert that:  A person doesn't need to be a doctor in direct contact with a patient - in order to gauge certain things - which can be obvious from even a photo, or a video of a person walking. 

 

If I see a pic of a person with deep lines in his face and a balding head, I don't have to be a doctor to ascertain that person is old. 

 

Similarly, when I see videos of Trump waddling to and fro with his fat butt, I don't need to be a doctor to realize he's overweight.  When I hear from various sources that he eats junk food and drinks diet coke all day, I can gauge that he's a stupid man who is harming his health.

 

When I hear and read about things he says and tweets, I can ascertain he's an ill-informed  dummy who is harmful for America.  I don't need a framed psychiatry diploma on my wall to deduce that.  Neither do I need to do an in-depth personal interview with the rude idiot.  I've been on this planet for well over half a century.  I have the ability to gauge people on basic levels - as, I assume, you do also.

4 paragraphs of embarrassing nothing!

 

How come you refused to respond to my hypothetical acceptance of Trump as a babysitter that you seemed to suggest wouldn't be a good idea?  Got an answer?

40 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

4 paragraphs of embarrassing nothing!

How come you refused to respond to my hypothetical acceptance of Trump as a babysitter that you seemed to suggest wouldn't be a good idea?  Got an answer?

Oh, was I supposed to respond to your response to my hypothetical q ?

Sorry.  Here goes:  I wouldn't want Trump Sr baby sitting my young daughters (if I had some) because he's a sexual pervert always on the prowl.  

2 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

Oh, was I supposed to respond to your response to my hypothetical q ?

Sorry.  Here goes:  I wouldn't want Trump Sr baby sitting my young daughters (if I had some) because he's a sexual pervert always on the prowl.  

You asked me a question, why would you not be interested in the answer?

 

Apart from making a ridiculous and untrue claim, that sounds as though you're also suggesting that he's a paedophile .

13 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

Oh, was I supposed to respond to your response to my hypothetical q ?

Sorry.  Here goes:  I wouldn't want Trump Sr baby sitting my young daughters (if I had some) because he's a sexual pervert always on the prowl.  

 

Look, unless your hypothetical daughter is also a hypothetical porn star, Trump probably wouldn’t be interested, so she’s safe, hypothetically.

Edited January 19, 20188 yr by Thakkar