"Supersized" upskirt model could face 5,000 baht fine for fast food frolic, says lawyer

 

Picture: Daily News

 

Thai social media was in meltdown yesterday after pictures of a sexy model were taken at a well known fast foot outlet.

 

It was not named by Daily News but we think you might have heard of it - especially as a character widely known as Ronald McDonald was looking on.

 

Upskirt pictures from the front and rear were shown on a Facebook fan page.

 

Though the model was wearing underwear she was revealing some shapely "buns" and a fair pair of covered "milkshakes" that may well have been "supersized".

 

 

Another "Ron" - online lawyer Ronnarong Kaewpetch - was contacted for his scholarly views by Daily News.

 

He said some people might call it art.

 

But pictures like these should be taken in private - the fact that it was done in a public place could well lead to a prosecution for lewd behavior and a fine of 5,000 baht.

 

Source: Daily News

 

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2018-05-17

Advertising a fur burger perhaps?

When a foreigner did similar at Wat Arun it was described as "despicable", here it is described as "art"!  Again, two tiered morality.........."buns", "milkshakes", "supersized".......I am appalled! What must Ronald McDonald be thinking?

Pretty stupid young lady. She had to know this was going to end badly if the pics were shared on social media.

 

Silly thing is, she'd be way overdressed anytime after 9pm in many Thai locations.

Either way you look at it it reminds me of a Happy Meal ! and anyhow doesn't look like Ronald to to fussed with that smile on his face !

5000 THB,cheap advertising for her,whatever she is offering.

expect "Big joke" and his team will be after her for more photo

ops.

regards Worgeordie

Edited May 17, 20188 yr by worgeordie
add on

59 minutes ago, webfact said:

 

Thai social media was in meltdown yesterday

What?

 

Again?

 

I’m surprised it works at all, it seems to go into meltdown so often. 

Edited May 17, 20188 yr by Bluespunk

19 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

What?

 

Again?

 

I’m surprised it works at all, it seems to meltdown so often. 

No problem! They are like butter. They loose their cool and they melt. If they manage to stay cool, they get hard again.
I am surprised they didn´t get hard out of this. 

Edited May 17, 20188 yr by Get Real

1 hour ago, ThreeEyedRaven said:

Advertising a fur burger perhaps?

Or filet o fish?

Good Girl.

Nice one, 

Silly girl, there's no room for this sort of behavior in Thai society.

p.s. where are the original pictures

What a great start to my day....thank you young lady

How can the authorities be concerned with this when so many people are dying on the roads? The uncensored pics are available on another ex-pat site, and very pretty she is too.

These photos are not aesthetic at all, I think.

 

Then again, I am sure there are many guys who would disagree.

I wondered why Ronald McDonald always appeared to be so hard...

 

I'm eagerly awaiting Prayuth's wise pronouncements on this.  

4 minutes ago, ChidlomDweller said:

I'm eagerly awaiting Prayuth's wise pronouncements on this.  

The word Twerk springs to mind - I think I've spelt it correctly?

 

10 minutes ago, Jeremy50 said:

How can the authorities be concerned with this when so many people are dying on the roads? .

Because of the identification line up, silly !

7 hours ago, Jeremy50 said:

How can the authorities be concerned with this when so many people are dying on the roads? The uncensored pics are available on another ex-pat site, and very pretty she is too.

link?

2 hours ago, Get Real said:

No problem! They are like butter. They loose their cool and they melt. If they manage to stay cool, they get hard again.
I am surprised they didn´t get hard out of this. 

They probably did (and still are) so maybe 'meltdown' is a euphemism.

1 minute ago, petermik said:

link?

G I Y F

 I  call for an immediate ''probe''

Edited May 17, 20188 yr by mok199
s

I need to see a lot more uncensored pics before I can pass judgement on whether it is lewd or not

If she's prosecuted, I have a limited number of spectator tickets available for the re-enactment. Front row, unobstructed view, next to the finger pointers.

 

PM me for details.

I need to see a lot more uncensored pics before I can pass judgement on whether it is lewd or not

Don't bother too much...there is no lewd photos...she has underwear on its a total

Non story...ps if you goto stickboy website the photos are there prepare for disappointment.

 

41 minutes ago, electric said:

If she's prosecuted, I have a limited number of spectator tickets available for the re-enactment. Front row, unobstructed view, next to the finger pointers.

 

PM me for details.

 

21 minutes ago, johng said:

Don't bother too much...there is no lewd photos...she has underwear on its a total

Non story...ps if you goto stickboy website the photos are there prepare for disappointment.

 

 

owwww .... thanks very much johng

 

Re-enactment spectator tickets fire sale ..... now 50% discount

If she was wearing underwear, why then the pixilating?

If she was wearing underwear, why then the pixilating?

For the same reason it was considered scandalous and obscene for women in the Victorian era to show their ankles.

Gosh darn it!

 

I have told her time and time again to stop this flashing nonsense!

 

At least she had knickers on this time.

 

(Makes her really horny, he he!)

Edited May 17, 20188 yr by Juan B Tong

Wonder what our feminist friends - any out there on Thai Visa? - would make of this?

 

Is the young lady in the pictures striking a blow for women's liberated sexuality . . . or contributing to men's objectification of women and helping foster that notorious "rape culture" we men are allegedly responsible for creating.

 

Answers on a dirty postcard, please..