Popular Post Chivas Posted June 7, 2018 Popular Post Posted June 7, 2018 Recreated with the errors from the Pilots, ATC and the general lack of clear communication that ends with the Jumbo on the golf course. Plane was eventually put back into service after extensive damage Qantas' most significant incident but no loss of life (You may need to click out an advert that interrupted me at the 10 minute mark) 4
KhunBENQ Posted June 8, 2018 Posted June 8, 2018 13 hours ago, Chivas said: general lack of clear communication As often in such accidents. "Lucky" in this case. The mother of bad communication cost 583 lives (1977, Los Rodeos, PanAm 747 vs. KLM 747).
Chivas Posted June 8, 2018 Author Posted June 8, 2018 48 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said: As often in such accidents. "Lucky" in this case. The mother of bad communication cost 583 lives (1977, Los Rodeos, PanAm 747 vs. KLM 747). Certainly was no question. For me on this particular incident its the 2nd officer keeping quiet about the ever increasing rain because the captain and 1st officer had had an earlier conversation about the same subject Words were left unspoken and the end result we know
KhunBENQ Posted June 8, 2018 Posted June 8, 2018 I was stunned to read that they did a 100 million Dollar (!) repair just to avoid a hull loss in their records. Did passengers in later years know what plane they were flying on 1
Popular Post reargunnerph3 Posted June 9, 2018 Popular Post Posted June 9, 2018 Qantas changed the standard policy on the advice of bean counters to land with flaps set at 25 degrees instead of 30 degrees, this saves fuel and no reverse thrust as it's cheaper to replace brakes than worn engines. So the landing speed was higher than it used to be. I flew for 30 years for Qantas and flew on VH-OJH "The Golf Buggy" plenty of times and it was safe to fly on because most of it was new. Flying is still the safest way to travel. 3
The Fat Controller Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 I read the full report years ago, they sent the data to Boeing and they replied "yep, using that speed and configuration you're going off the end with what you did" Also flew on it from Heathrow (BA codeshare) cheekily looked for wrinkles which amused the CSD, he told me not to mention the golf course !
stevo2207 Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 One of the pilots of that flight came to my place once for dinner I remember joking with him asking if he had any trouble pulling up in the driveway in the car LOL.One good thing they were off work for a long time on full pay while they investigated it.
Oztruckie Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 There's a good book titled, The People Who Killed Qantas, or something like that, it's all about this type of stuff, and includes the story about the 747 that run off the runway at Changi many years ago, good read. 1
bra Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 Here is the full ATSB report for those interested: https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/24447/aair199904538_001.pdf
The Theory Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 They should put the pilots on Baht cars for more practice and communications.
Chivas Posted June 9, 2018 Author Posted June 9, 2018 The actual Qantas 747 "Longreach" was the aircraft in the accident featured in the BBC show Airport in the 1990's on multiple occasions
thaiowl Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 Remember the incident well. The joke at the time that one of the fairways at the nearby airport golf course was renamed "The Qantas Approach". 1
shaunoro Posted June 11, 2018 Posted June 11, 2018 Indeed. Played golf a few times at Thai RAF golf course between the runways. All rather surreal playing between the runways. Qantas Longreach became an immovable obstruction, so a free drop was allowed.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now