Jump to content

New York sues Trump and his charity over 'self-dealing'


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hopefully the court case will determine the truth.

 

Personally, I trust very few charities as way too much of their income is spent on 'admin'....

 

Time for the politicians to crack down on charities that benefit those running the charity - far more than the supposed recipients.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:

Hopefully the court case will determine the truth.

 

Personally, I trust very few charities as way too much of their income is spent on 'admin'....

 

Time for the politicians to crack down on charities that benefit those running the charity - far more than the supposed recipients.

That's besides the point. In Trump's case he made allegedly charitable donations that benefiteded himself.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

That's besides the point. In Trump's case he made allegedly charitable donations that benefiteded himself.

I said this in my post:-

 

"Hopefully the court case will determine the truth."

Posted
2 hours ago, dick dasterdly said:

Personally, I trust very few charities as way too much of their income is spent on 'admin'....

 

That's why charities are audited (by independent third parties) and, if anything seems out of the ordinary, investigated.  

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, attrayant said:

 

That's why charities are audited (by independent third parties) and, if anything seems out of the ordinary, investigated.  

Dick Dasterdly is parroting campaigns run by the rightwing press in the UK that tar all charities with the excesses of a very few.

 

The Trump ‘charity’ in question is established in NY and as you rightly point out subject to very stringent regulation.. as the Trumps are now discovering.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s be very clear about this.

 

There credible reports of some charities but by absolutely not all charities spending too much money on high salaries and high administration costs.

 

These particular allegations against Trump and his family do not relate to high salaries or high administration costs, they relate to illegal remove of donations, illegal use of donations, fraudulent accounting, obtaining donations by deception.

 

These allegations are not about poor or inept management they relate to criminality.

You forgot "perjury" when Trump affirmed on his tax returns that the non-profit did not make any political contributions.

 

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/14/17465038/trump-foundation-lawsuit-new-york-attorney-general

 

Check out point 3 "Justice for All", the amateurish attempt to hide his criminal behaviour suggests he has got really careless or he believes he is untouchable.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, FitnessHealthTravel said:

It's more BLAH from the Dems.  Scraps to create more headlines while Trump gets s**t done!

That's exactly what he's getting done.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Briggsy said:

You forgot "perjury" when Trump affirmed on his tax returns that the non-profit did not make any political contributions.

 

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/14/17465038/trump-foundation-lawsuit-new-york-attorney-general

 

Check out point 3 "Justice for All", the amateurish attempt to hide his criminal behaviour suggests he has got really careless or he believes he is untouchable.

Technically speaking, I don't think 'perjury" is the correct term. That applies to lying in a court or some other official public setting where you take an oath. Whatever it's called, it's definitely illegal.

Posted
2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Technically speaking, I don't think 'perjury" is the correct term. That applies to lying in a court or some other official public setting where you take an oath. Whatever it's called, it's definitely illegal.

In the American legal system, this would be the offence, I understand, for signing an untrue statement. In the British system, I believe the charge could be fraud by false representation, evasion of income tax or providing false information to HMRC.

 

The terminology differs between the two systems. Whatever you call it, it is illegal.

Posted
7 hours ago, bristolboy said:

That's besides the point. In Trump's case he made allegedly charitable donations that benefiteded himself.

 

In other words don't trust him with 5 cents.

Posted

"How Donald Trump Took Transactional Philanthropy to Its Logical, and Illegal, Extreme"  Even when he spends other people’s money, or makes a charitable donation in his own name, he’s always buying something. He’s what happens when transactional philanthropy is taken to its logical conclusion, divorced entirely from any kind of genuine generosity. "

https://slate.com/business/2018/06/trump-foundation-lawsuit-details-how-donald-trump-took-transactional-philanthropy-to-its-extreme.html

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 6/15/2018 at 9:37 AM, FitnessHealthTravel said:

It's more BLAH from the Dems.  Scraps to create more headlines while Trump gets s**t done!

How  long until he is up to  his  neck  in his  own  s**t ?  A stinking  pile  that  big  has the  potential to leave a  bad smell around  for a  long  long time.

Posted
On ‎6‎/‎15‎/‎2018 at 9:37 AM, FitnessHealthTravel said:

It's more BLAH from the Dems.  Scraps to create more headlines while Trump gets s**t done!

Did you fall of your bike and hit something with your head before you had the helmet?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...