17 minutes ago, Esso49 said:

In fact Religion and politics go hand in hand

Unfortunately!

The more I've googled child marriage the more I understand that it's a world problem, not a Muslim problem. Mexico has 1.5 million child brides and it couldn't be more Catholic. The US has very low age of consent laws not to mention the polygamous Mormons, Hutterites, and Doukabours.

South America isn't Muslim and has a huge number of child marriages. Africa is terrible as well.

 

https://www.girlsnotbrides.org/where-does-it-happen/

23 minutes ago, Esso49 said:

Well that is not a proven fact, something that has just been passed down, but obviously his example was not followed by many Arab men since then due to their known proclivity to young boys.

Their proclivity for young boys comes from the fact that they are taught that the Messiah (not yet arrived but on his way) is predicted to be born by a man of 28 years of age. Therefore many Moslem men don't have sex with a woman before that age but do have anal sex in the hope that they will become pregnant with the Messiah. Having anal sex at a young age leaves them with a lifelong liking for this particular act. One of the reasons that Moslem tourists to Thailand have a proclivity for ladyboys. 

Very disturbing. Why is it allowed??

Just now, hyku1147 said:

 

 

Perhaps - for the good of society - the haters should be rounded up and shot?

Maybe we could just leave it at religious zealots? TV would lose most of it's posters if we took your course of action.

7 minutes ago, Spidey said:

Their proclivity for young boys comes from the fact that they are taught that the Messiah (not yet arrived but on his way) is predicted to be born by a man of 28 years of age. Therefore many Moslem men don't have sex with a woman before that age but do have anal sex in the hope that they will become pregnant with the Messiah. Having anal sex at a young age leaves them with a lifelong liking for this particular act. One of the reasons that Moslem tourists to Thailand have a proclivity for ladyboys. 

You're going to need links to back this up. I think you're pulling this out of thin air.

Show me proof and I'll stand corrected but.......

3 hours ago, 727Sky said:

Well at least she was not 6 or consummated when 9 like Mohammad's Aisha.. Come on guys we need to support all the 7th century belief systems so they can abuse the young boys and girls while acting like there is nothing wrong with their messed up religion.. Otherwise we will be considered Nazi Islamophobic a-holes or something...  

 

Don't forget the catholic priests and their bishops who have no hesitation to cover up the crimes.

Just now, duanebigsby said:

You're going to need links to back this up. I think you're pulling this out of thin air.

Show me proof and I'll stand corrected but.......

More than half of my extended family are Moslem. Have discussed this with them at length. Why would I pull it out of thin air? I haven't got that much of a warped imagination!

3 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Don't forget the catholic priests and their bishops who have no hesitation to cover up the crimes.

What does that have to do with the topic, which is child brides in Thailand ?

1 hour ago, biggles45 said:

Nothing will be done by Western governments eager to appease muslim migrants just as with the muslim men who have four wives, even tho bigamy is illegal. In Australia they treat 3 of the "wives" as single mothers, give each one a government pension and a place to live in, courtesy of the tax payer. 

The above post is an outright lie, the Australian government permits no such thing. Guess it's to be expected considering racism has never been much concerned with facts. Truth is, the overwhelming majority of these muslims are more than likely better Australians than you are biggles45.

1 minute ago, sanemax said:

What does that have to do with the topic, which is child brides in Thailand ?

Response to post #50.

 

But I agree the real topic is child bribes and yes it's disgusting.

4 minutes ago, Spidey said:

More than half of my extended family are Moslem. Have discussed this with them at length. Why would I pull it out of thin air? I haven't got that much of a warped imagination!

It didn't sound plausible and I couldn't find anything on the internet to back up your story.

I'll accept your extended family's explanation.

 

Edited September 2, 20188 yr by duanebigsby

3 hours ago, Esso49 said:

So via another medium you mean a fortune teller ?

Prophet of doom ?

Dress it up any way you want. IMHO a 40 yo Muslim marrying a girl not even in her teens is a pedophile, and his religion approves it.

1 minute ago, sanemax said:

You are suggesting that he has had gay sex with Muslims !!!!!!!!!!!

That is quite a stupid thing to say

Why?  He might enjoy it.  Who are you to tell people who they can and can't have sex with?  After all, he is saying the all Muslim men have gay sex all the time... and its normal in his extended family.  

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Dress it up any way you want. IMHO a 40 yo Muslim marrying a girl not even in her teens is a pedophile, and his religion approves it.

As do Mormons,   Hutterites,  Doukabours,   Christians and now Buddhists apparently

Just now, jak2002003 said:

Why?  He might enjoy it.  Who are you to tell people who they can and can't have sex with?  After all, he is saying the all Muslim men have gay sex all the time... and its normal in his extended family.  

No, you didnt understand my point .

You were saying that if a person has knowledge or an opinion on something , then that person must be participating in said subject , which is quite a stupid thing to say

5 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

 

Unfortunately, some of us seem incapable of making a logical distinction between individuals who committee egregious acts in spite of their religious beliefs and those who do so because of them.

I don't see the difference.

A child's rape is no more or less horrific no matter what the underlying motivation of the pedophiles involved.

Just now, sanemax said:

No, you didnt understand my point .

You were saying that if a person has knowledge or an opinion on something , then that person must be participating in said subject , which is quite a stupid thing to say

No, you are wrong.

Nowhere does anyone say "that person MUST be participating", what was said is "doing is the best way to learn" (not the only way, the best way).

So jump down off that high horse there buddy.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

I'm not aware of the Christian and Buddhist religions actually approving of pedophilia, although it has been happening for centuries.

If letting it happen can be construed as approval  I may be stretching the definition.

But the churches are showing a blind eye to it in North and South America and  the mainly Buddhist government of Thailand has kept a blind eye to this as well.

I'm not sure ... wrong plus wrong equals right?

 

who cares who did it, it still isn't right and if the culprit can be found, then prosecute

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

I'm not aware of the Christian and Buddhist religions actually approving of pedophilia, although it has been happening for centuries.

They approve of it in the sense that when one of their clergy commits the offence, they go to great lengths to sweep it under the carpet. It's also made a taboo subject for their flock, to discourage them from reporting it.

 

Complicity is as much a crime as the act itself. Both Popes should be locked up for life.

21 minutes ago, pornprong said:

No, you are wrong.

Nowhere does anyone say "that person MUST be participating", what was said is "doing is the best way to learn" (not the only way, the best way).

So jump down off that high horse there buddy.

No, you claimed that he must be an expert on homosexuality within the Muslims community , so therefore he must be participating in such activities , which indeed is a stupid thing to say

11 minutes ago, sanemax said:

No, you claimed that he must be an expert on homosexuality within the Muslims community , so therefore he must be participating in such activities , which indeed is a stupid thing to say

No, I said he APPEARS to be an expert (given his prolific posting on the subject matter) and then added a quote by Branson saying "the best way to learn about anything is by doing" (note- not the only way, just the best way).

I never said he MUST be an expert on Muslim homosexuality and never said he MUST therefore be a homosexual.

Reading comprehension is clearly not your strong point.

Your errors are forgiven though, I assume all this talk of sweaty homosexual sex has got you a little flustered and distracted, perhaps a touch hot under the collar?

                         

                        

Edited September 2, 20188 yr by pornprong

11 years old girl!?? Come on this report is a slander by British hating Muslims journalist Hannah Ellis-Petersen.

Muslims like Thais have puberty age, which is girls have their period at 14+.

4 hours ago, Esso49 said:

No worse than any other other religion.   they are all basically evil and dependent upon mass brainwashing 

 

I tend to agree with the second part of your posting, but not the first. This could possibly be because in my country Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Scientologists and other religious sects are not committing acts of terror in the name of their faith.

 

Somebody asked me a question recently which I could not answer, namely:  Has any nation with a traditionallyJudeo-Christian culture benefited long term by adopting an alternative religion (Islam, for example) or a totalitarian political system (Communism, say).

 

I can't think of single one. Can anyone?

Edited September 2, 20188 yr by Krataiboy

11 minutes ago, Different said:

11 years old girl!?? Come on this report is a slander by British hating Muslims journalist Hannah Ellis-Petersen.

Muslims like Thais have puberty age, which is girls have their period at 14+.

You obviously know very little about females.

I'm teaching Grade 5 which are 10 to 11 years old. The girls are beginning to get their periods this year.

One girl started last year.

45 minutes ago, duanebigsby said:

I don't see the difference.

A child's rape is no more or less horrific no matter what the underlying motivation of the pedophiles involved.

If my religion motivated me to belief child rape was justified, I would find another. Wouldn't you?

1 minute ago, Krataiboy said:

If my religion motivated me to belief child rape was justified, I would find another. Wouldn't you?

Reason and logic aren't strong points amongst the religious.

I quite like the quote "those that can make you believe in absurdities, can also make you commit atrocities".

3 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

If my religion motivated me to belief child rape was justified, I would find another. Wouldn't you?

No.

I would become an atheist which I already am.

Only the very fundamentalist Muslims believe child rape is justified.

Mexico has 1.5 million child brides. South America has a huge problem with child marriage.

I hope you're not Catholic.