Popular Post GroveHillWanderer Posted September 24, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted September 24, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, HLover said: In court, "we all know what it means" would be foolish. As well as "obvious intention". Can you imagine some of these genius types against a billionaires lawyer? Oops doesn't quite cover it. Bored now, bye Trannie I'm sorry but I think you have this completely reversed. I can't imagine that any competent lawyer would or could plausibly try to argue that the abbreviation (not the prefix) 'pedo' means anything other than 'pedophile,' when given a situation in which his client has used it to refer to a plaintiff who the same client subsequently refers to as a child rapist and someone who has married a 12 year-old girl. Now, if the lawsuit relied solely on the use of the word 'pedo' in total isolation with no other context or corroborating evidence to indicate what the abbreviation might reasonably be taken to mean, you might have a point. But that isn't the case here. Edited September 24, 2018 by GroveHillWanderer 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinobot Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 I’ve lost a lot of respect for Musk over the past few months. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sheryl Posted September 24, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted September 24, 2018 5 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said: I'm not sure why you keep trying to flog this dead horse. Any lingering doubt (if there ever even was any) about what Musk meant when he used the term 'pedo' was removed when he went on to describe Unsworth as a child rapist. Well before that, actually. Immediately after the "pedo" post one of his twitter follows posted something to the effect of "you are actually calling one of the cave rescuers a pedophile?" and Musk replied " Bet you a signed dollar it turns out to be true". Leaving absolutely no doubt that this was what he had meant to say. Neither then nor in his subsequent apology did he say his comment did not mean pedophile, and had that been the case he surely would have - the apology would have said the term had been misunderstood. On the country, the responses he has offered to criticism have been (1) it "must" be true; (2) the other guy provoked him into saying it and (3) back to #1 again with the added flourish of claiming he took a 12 year bride - demonstrably false. Not working with a full deck these days to say the least. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 8 minutes ago, Sheryl said: Well before that, actually. Immediately after the "pedo" post one of his twitter follows posted something to the effect of "you are actually calling one of the cave rescuers a pedophile?" and Musk replied " Bet you a signed dollar it turns out to be true". Leaving absolutely no doubt that this was what he had meant to say. Neither then nor in his subsequent apology did he say his comment did not mean pedophile, and had that been the case he surely would have - the apology would have said the term had been misunderstood. On the country, the responses he has offered to criticism have been (1) it "must" be true; (2) the other guy provoked him into saying it and (3) back to #1 again with the added flourish of claiming he took a 12 year bride - demonstrably false. Not working with a full deck these days to say the least. Carefull using such idiomatic comments otherwise he might slag you off over such a phrase... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheryl Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 If he wants to sue everyone who is suggesting he has developed mental problems he will go broke on legal fees...the numbers are legion. Including many of his own past admirers/followers. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The manic Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 4 minutes ago, Artisi said: Carefull using such idiomatic comments otherwise he might slag you off over such a phrase... Irrevant and incorrect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 1 minute ago, The manic said: Irrevant and incorrect Care to expand your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevemac Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 In court, "we all know what it means" would be foolish. As well as "obvious intention". Can you imagine some of these genius types against a billionaires lawyer? Oops doesn't quite cover it. Bored now, bye Trannie If it was taken in isolation you may have a point, but Musk's later statements clarified his intended meaning. The evidence would cover all supporting statements.Sent from my SM-G920F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now