11 hours ago, riclag said:

 He had a consensual romp  with  a very beautiful young lady many year's ago! The left being the left tried to expose this as something else, nasty ,dirty and unnatural She was another victim of the Far left deranged  plots .I choose to be a Independent voter ,I'm not committed to either party or policies,I'm not a fan of globalization or socialism. 

Voting Dem all my life changed when he announced his intentions! I like a  billionaire free wheeling non politician who is accomplishing most of  his promises for change! 

 

In other words, your adulation of Trump trumps any consideration of his character or conduct.

Thanks for making that clear.

11 hours ago, JulesMad said:

I believe ANYTHING of which the orange turd said it is fake   With trumpy's track record of lying, it MUST be true...

 

Only idiots vote for this abomination of a human, who makes the world a worse place for all ????

 

I nominate the above "POST OF THIS THREAD".

3 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

What is her gripe anyways? Is she really doing all of this JUST because according to her she had CONSENSUAL relations with Trump AND got paid for it?

Defamation of a whore? im not talking about sex workers here. I dont get it.

Can one of you get Trumpers by any means necessary explain what her problem with Trump is?

 

 

 

Reading the OP would help. So would stopping to pretend this wasn't discussed, in detail, on numerous past topics - your contrived rendition of events and motivations notwithstanding.

6 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

What is her gripe anyways?

 

Not seeing her "griping", but rather the President seems to be doing most of the griping?

 

She seems to simply want to be free to speak, certainly, that's not too much to ask?

 

 

 

1 minute ago, mtls2005 said:

 

Not seeing her "griping", but rather the President seems to be doing most of the griping?

 

She seems to simply want to be free to speak, certainly, that's not too much to ask?

 

 

 

she did sign an nda no, isnt that the whole purpose of an nda contract?

4 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Reading the OP would help. So would stopping to pretend this wasn't discussed, in detail, on numerous past topics - your contrived rendition of events and motivations notwithstanding.

not much there to read other than she thought she found a tiny legal angle and judge tossed it out.

well atleast she got her book out before her case was dismissed.

 

4 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

she did sign an nda no, isnt that the whole purpose of an nda contract?

 

Trump's lawyer says the president doesn't think Stormy Daniels' hush-money deal is valid, and won't sue her for breaking the NDA

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump does not believe porn actress Stormy Daniels' hush-money deal, which his former personal lawyer said was done to influence the 2016 presidential election, is valid and will not carry out threats to sue her for breaking the agreement by discussing details of their alleged affair, Trump's attorney said in a court filing Saturday.

Hours earlier an attorney for the company set up to handle the deal offered to rescind Daniels' nondisclosure agreement. The company, Essential Consultants, also scrapped a threatened $20 million lawsuit against Daniels.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-lawyer-trump-doesnt-think-stormy-daniels-deal-is-valid-2018-9

 

 

The President seems to be the one going on the offensive, can't how calling a woman "horse-face" is prudent, but he does seem to be in some sort of Benjamin Button-like tail-spin reverting to childish insults.

2 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

Trump's lawyer says the president doesn't think Stormy Daniels' hush-money deal is valid, and won't sue her for breaking the NDA

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump does not believe porn actress Stormy Daniels' hush-money deal, which his former personal lawyer said was done to influence the 2016 presidential election, is valid and will not carry out threats to sue her for breaking the agreement by discussing details of their alleged affair, Trump's attorney said in a court filing Saturday.

Hours earlier an attorney for the company set up to handle the deal offered to rescind Daniels' nondisclosure agreement. The company, Essential Consultants, also scrapped a threatened $20 million lawsuit against Daniels.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-lawyer-trump-doesnt-think-stormy-daniels-deal-is-valid-2018-9

 

 

The President seems to be the one going on the offensive, can't how calling a woman "horse-face" is prudent, but he does seem to be in some sort of Benjamin Button-like tail-spin reverting to childish insults.

tail spin? he's been giving nick names to his opponents from thr start of the campaign 3 years ago.  he's not reverting, this is what he does.

horse face, mushroom d#$k seems like they have thing going ????

Yeah she's a real work that one an aging stripper pornstar trying to desperately reignite her failing career with a reptilian sleazeball porn lawyer... a real rags to riches tale or is it rags to bitches.... lol 

30 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

Did you buy her book or watch it on the View?

No need to read the book. It was all over the news, wall to wall.

Don't have time to read trash. Have never seen the View.

 

Okay? answered?

15 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

fair enough. so is she still angry he offered to pay in 2005.

 

She doesn't come across as "angry", certainly not like her detractors. AFAIK, Trump "funneled" the money to Ms. Daniels proactively. At least that's one of the "stories" one hears from the Trump side.

 

According to her, Trump offered cash after sex, but she declined. Not sure who comes across as "moral" in that scenario, when one understands that wife #3 is at home nursing child #5 (that we know of).

 

I find her to be witty, engaging, intelligent, successful, a loving parent. I have no desire to denigrate her physical appearance, lifestyle and employment choices or motivations. Insecure men seem unable to resist calling her all sorts of names. She drew 22 million viewers for her 60 Minutes segment, while the President pulled a paltry 11 million. That must've driven him bonkers.

 

No clue why he's going on the offensive - insulting women seems to come naturally to him, suspect he's worried about Cohen's cooperation with SC and SDNY? Time to trot Rudy out of hibernation?

 

 

13 minutes ago, neeray said:

No need to read the book. It was all over the news, wall to wall.

Don't have time to read trash. Have never seen the View.

 

Okay? answered?

ya man, I was joking with ya. 

13 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

She doesn't come across as "angry", certainly not like her detractors. AFAIK, Trump "funneled" the money to Ms. Daniels proactively. At least that's one of the "stories" one hears from the Trump side.

 

According to her, Trump offered cash after sex, but she declined. Not sure who comes across as "moral" in that scenario, when one understands that wife #3 is at home nursing child #5 (that we know of).

 

I find her to be witty, engaging, intelligent, successful, a loving parent. I have no desire to denigrate her physical appearance, lifestyle and employment choices or motivations. Insecure men seem unable to resist calling her all sorts of names. She drew 22 million viewers for her 60 Minutes segment, while the President pulled a paltry 11 million. That must've driven him bonkers.

 

No clue why he's going on the offensive - insulting women seems to come naturally to him, suspect he's worried about Cohen's cooperation with SC and SDNY? Time to trot Rudy out of hibernation?

 

 

you're right. she does not come across as being angry. 

 

which then leaves to her motivations. fame? 22 million viewers for an aging porn star should sell a lot of books and win a lot of crowdfund support.

what would she or cbs do without Trump?

 

As for Trump, I doubt he is fuming at the viewer numbers.

Stormy gets 22,000,000

Trump gets  11, 000,000

 

equals Trump gets 33,000,000 as he is the main character of interest in her story. win win!

 

 

On 10/17/2018 at 12:02 PM, attrayant said:

When your grasp of the language is so poor, you can't help but refer to yourself as "a total con".

 

here is her "third rate lawyer"

 

Off-topic, inflammatory posts and replies removed.  

 

Off-topic post and replies removed.  

More proof of the real deep state at work. Too bad they cannot change the will of the people, as much as they try. Such desperation. Wait another ten days. The people will speak.

 

Down with the real deep state. Down with Trump. Down with the GOP. Down with an utter lack of integrity, compassion, ethics, and lies, lies and more lies.

 

Bring back decency, bring back a modicum of integrity. Bring back statesmanship. Bring back experience. Bring back brains, articulation, and common sense. Drain the Trump swamp!

56 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

More proof of the real deep state at work. Too bad they cannot change the will of the people, as much as they try. Such desperation. Wait another ten days. The people will speak.

 

Down with the real deep state. Down with Trump. Down with the GOP. Down with an utter lack of integrity, compassion, ethics, and lies, lies and more lies.

 

Bring back decency, bring back a modicum of integrity. Bring back statesmanship. Bring back experience. Bring back brains, articulation, and common sense. Drain the Trump swamp!

 

Interesting how whenever something doesn't pan some posters' way, it's down to the "Deep State". Kinda neat how that works for both sides of the political spectrum.

I guess Trump was lucky and got a judge that upheld the law rather than an activist Trump hater.

I wonder if the <deleted> that funded her case so far will be as keen to throw more money away on an appeal?

17 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

More proof of the real deep state at work. Too bad they cannot change the will of the people, as much as they try. Such desperation. Wait another ten days. The people will speak.

 

Down with the real deep state. Down with Trump. Down with the GOP. Down with an utter lack of integrity, compassion, ethics, and lies, lies and more lies.

 

Bring back decency, bring back a modicum of integrity. Bring back statesmanship. Bring back experience. Bring back brains, articulation, and common sense. Drain the Trump swamp!

555555555555555

The "deep state", if it exists is working AGAINST Trump.

 

 

Seems there are some posters that think democracy only works if it gives the result that THEY want.

Trump wins again. Onward to the elections and hopefully the booting of that loser Sessions. Once he is gone, Trump will be able to really get down to business.

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Seems there are some posters that think democracy only works if it gives the result that THEY want.

Trump wins again. Onward to the elections and hopefully the booting of that loser Sessions. Once he is gone, Trump will be able to really get down to business.

More and mkore you're showing your real colours, after starting off pretening you didn't support Trump.

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

555555555555555

The "deep state", if it exists is working AGAINST Trump.

 

 

 

https://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/1063168-us-judge-dismisses stormy daniels defamation-lawsuit-against-trump/?page=4&tab=comments#comment-13498837

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Seems there are some posters that think democracy only works if it gives the result that THEY want.

Trump wins again. Onward to the elections and hopefully the booting of that loser Sessions. Once he is gone, Trump will be able to really get down to business.

 

"Seems there are some posters that think democracy only works if it gives the result that THEY want."

 

Off-topic posts removed.

 

On 10/26/2018 at 12:36 PM, spidermike007 said:

More proof of the real deep state at work. Too bad they cannot change the will of the people, as much as they try. Such desperation. Wait another ten days. The people will speak.

 

Down with the real deep state. Down with Trump. Down with the GOP. Down with an utter lack of integrity, compassion, ethics, and lies, lies and more lies.

 

Bring back decency, bring back a modicum of integrity. Bring back statesmanship. Bring back experience. Bring back brains, articulation, and common sense. Drain the Trump swamp!

Yep the people will speak and it will be a RED WAVE 

Get your tissues ready and ensure your safe space is ready 

On 10/27/2018 at 5:42 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I guess Trump was lucky and got a judge that upheld the law rather than an activist Trump hater.

I wonder if the <deleted> that funded her case so far will be as keen to throw more money away on an appeal?

AVENATI is broke 

A judgement against his by a former associate for $5 Million 

Evicted from his offices for not paying his rent 

Has issues with the IRS for unpaid tax

He is done 

On ‎10‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 1:03 PM, stevenl said:

More and mkore you're showing your real colours, after starting off pretening you didn't support Trump.

Where did I say I didn't support Trump before the election? Quote or retract.