Jump to content

Trump threatens to send military, shut border as migrants head for Mexico


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump threatens to send military, shut border as migrants head for Mexico

By Susan Heavey and Sofia Menchu

 

2018-10-18T214449Z_1_LYNXNPEE9H21J_RTROPTP_4_USA-IMMIGRATION-CARAVAN.JPG

A Honduran migrant, part of a caravan trying to reach the U.S., climbs on a truck during a new leg of their travel in Escuintla, Guatemala October 18, 2018. REUTERS/Edgard Garrido

 

WASHINGTON/GUATEMALA CITY (Reuters) - President Donald Trump threatened to deploy the military and close the southern U.S. border on Thursday as Hondurans and Salvadorans joined thousands of migrants in Guatemala hoping to travel north.

 

"I must, in the strongest of terms, ask Mexico to stop this onslaught - and if unable to do so I will call up the U.S. Military and CLOSE OUR SOUTHERN BORDER!" Trump wrote on Twitter.

 

Several thousand Honduran migrants moved this week through Guatemala, and some were trying to cross to Mexico on Thursday, according to local media. Some hope to eventually enter the United States to escape violence and poverty in Central America.

 

Central American migrants hiked from Honduras through muddy jungle and residential streets, some toting babies along with backpacks, Reuters images show.

 

In Guatemala City, where migrant shelters filled with people, waves of people departed at daybreak on roads leading to Mexico. The nearest border is about 110 miles (177 km) away.

 

"If we don't get across, we're going to try the same thing again," said Gustavo Perez, a builder from Honduras, speaking at a shelter in Guatemala City.

 

"We hope that in this big caravan group, they let us in," he added, referring to the United States.

 

Mexico's peso weakened more than 1.5 percent against the dollar on Thursday, partly driven by Trump's comments, analysts said.

 

ELECTION ISSUE

Trump, who has sought to curtail immigration and build a border wall on the Mexican border, this week threatened to halt aid if Central American governments did not act.

 

Trump ran for president in 2016 on promises to toughen U.S. immigration policies and build a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico.

 

Illegal immigration is likely to be a top issue in Nov. 6 U.S. congressional elections. Republicans seeking to retain control of the House of Representatives will likely present the migrant caravan as evidence of what they say is a need to further tighten the U.S.-Mexico border.

 

Frustrated by Congress' failure to fully fund his proposed wall at the border with Mexico, Trump in April ordered National Guard personnel to help secure the border in four southwestern U.S. states.

 

In a string of tweets on Thursday, Trump also said the border issue was more important to him than the new trade deal with Mexico to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement pact.

 

"The assault on our country at our Southern Border, including the Criminal elements and DRUGS pouring in, is far more important to me, as President, than Trade or the USMCA. Hopefully Mexico will stop this onslaught at their Northern Border," Trump wrote. He was referring to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which is awaiting ratification.

 

U.S. Representative Michael McCaul, the Republican chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said U.S. border security was a key election issue.

 

"We have to secure that border once and for all," McCaul told Fox News in an interview, adding that he hoped Congress could tackle the issue of Trump's planned wall after the Nov. 6 election.

 

The caravan has been growing steadily since it left the violent Honduran city of San Pedro Sula on Saturday. There are no official estimates of the size of the group.

 

Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales said on Wednesday his government dismissed threatened constraints placed on foreign aid.

 

He said he had spoken with Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez about ensuring the migrants who want to return home can do so safely.

 

Mexico's incoming foreign minister, Marcelo Ebrard, told local radio that he was not surprised by Trump's comments, and said it was political.

 

"It was predictable, and it's also very close to the election. He's making a political calculation," Ebrard said, adding that migrants arriving to Mexico without a visa would need to apply for refugee status.

 

Mexico's foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

 

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is due to meet with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto in Mexico City on Friday.

 

(Reporting by Susan Heavey, Doina Chiacu, Sofia Menchu, Edgard Garrido and Miguel Angel Gutierrez; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe and Alistair Bell)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-10-19
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ReMarKable said:

Why do presidents. prime ministers and officials from other countries sound so much smarter than US executive office holders?

I dont know , Why do presidents. prime ministers and officials from other countries sound so much smarter than US executive office holders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ReMarKable said:

I would prefer you just tell me

You are telling the joke , you began telling the joke off and I teed you up for the punchline.

Ican not say the punchline to your joke , because I havent heard this joke before .

So, "Why do presidents. prime ministers and officials from other countries sound so much smarter than US executive office holders?"

   I dont know................why do presidents. prime ministers and officials from other countries sound so much smarter than US executive office holders?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, helpisgood said:

 

United Fruit Co., the Dulles Bros., CIA, Oscar Romero, four raped and murdered nuns (El Sal., 1980), etc. and etc.  Yeah, the US may not be directly involved in certain incidents, but guess where the funding, training, other support, etc. came from?  It's all about protecting foreign corp. interests.  

 

Check out General Smedley Butler's book, War is a Racket.  

 

And yes, blame should be shared by some Central Americans who wanted a piece of the action.  

 

And now, with one end result being these refugees, maybe the USA should own up to some responsibility.  

 

Oh, it's mcambl61 again with the easy clicking of a sad emoticon.  How about instead writing a rationale backing up your sadness?  

Edited by helpisgood
typo
  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

This is a rather simplistic, almost child-like, view of the world, but right in line with the "Trump Doctrine".

 

I honestly don't even know what to make of such a statement. We have joint defense agreements with many, many, many, many countries, for a reason.

 

 

You must understand , these forums are limited in discussion , I would need a book to explain what I mean , but I condense that into a few sentences , hence the simplistic nature .

  You do have joint defence agreements with numerous countries , but that doesnt give the citizens of those countries the right to walk to the USA and go and live there .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sanemax said:

I deleted all your off-topic post about World War 2 , as I consider it to be off-topic and irrelevant .

   Do fill me in on history : What are the "atrocities" that the USA inflicted upon El Salvador ?

   I also can not tell anything to the "survivors of those that were killed" , because there would be no survivors of people that were killed

 

They were not off topic.  I was applying your principles, as you claim support your opinion of the OP, to more well-known examples to better demonstrate their amorality.  You are just running away from admitting that they are obviously absurd.  

 

As for El Salvador, the US meddling there is so well-known that you can easily do it yourself.  As I have stated above, trace what happened to Oscar Romero and those four nuns just for starters.  Don't forget: Follow the money!  It's all about protecting US foreign investments.

 

Oh, and read General Butler's book that I have mentioned above.    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, sanemax said:

You must understand , these forums are limited in discussion , I would need a book to explain what I mean , but I condense that into a few sentences , hence the simplistic nature .

  You do have joint defence agreements with numerous countries , but that doesnt give the citizens of those countries the right to walk to the USA and go and live there .

 

If you cannot summarize it fairly and accurately, then why go through the trouble of misrepresenting it?  Of course, that's assuming what you are trying to say does make sense.  

Edited by helpisgood
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they had the world's longest wall to keep them thar foreigners out?

 

During the last US election, I said to my American friend I hoped that Trump would win. Nothing to do with politics whatsoever, but purely for the entertainment value he would provide.

I've not been disappointed so far.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...