Jump to content

Bank of England's Carney spells out no-deal Brexit hit to UK


webfact

Recommended Posts

Bank of England's Carney spells out no-deal Brexit hit to UK

By David Milliken and Andy Bruce

 

2019-02-12T132539Z_2_LYNXNPEF1B13A_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-BOE-CARNEY.JPG

The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney arrives at an FT event in London, Britain February 12, 2019. REUTERS/Hannah McKay

 

LONDON (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Mark Carney warned on Tuesday of the potential shock to Britain's economy from Brexit which could serve as an "acid test" for countries around the world trying to respond to the challenges of globalization.

 

The United Kingdom is on course to leave the European Union on March 29 without a deal, unless Prime Minister Theresa May can convince the bloc to amend the deal she agreed in November and then sell it to skeptical British lawmakers.

 

"We shouldn't be under any illusions," Carney said, answering audience questions after a speech at a Financial Times event. "A no-deal, no-transition Brexit would be an economic shock for this economy ... and it would also send a signal globally about the prospects of refounding globalization."

 

"In many respects, Brexit is the first test of a new global order and could prove the acid test of whether a way can be found to broaden the benefits of openness while enhancing democratic accountability," he said.

 

Carney said a successful Brexit deal could lead to a new form of international trade built on a better balance between local and supranational interests.

 

But a no-deal Brexit would hit living standards in Britain, at least in the short term, and a fall in the value of the pound would not solve the economy's problems as suggested by some Brexit supporters.

 

"That's part of the necessary adjustment mechanism but it is not a step to prosperity. It is a hit to income," Carney said.

 

SLOWDOWN

Carney, a Canadian, has previously warned of the risks that Brexit poses to the United Kingdom, the world's fifth-biggest economy, earning him the ire of some anti-EU campaigners.

 

"People are tired of Carney's gloomy, inaccurate, anti-Brexit predictions," said Richard Tice, co-chairman of campaign group Leave Means Leave. "Does he want us to fail so he is proven right? It's time he resigned and went home."

 

By contrast, John McDonnell, the would-be finance minister of the main opposition Labour party, said Carney's remarks showed why the government should take a no-deal Brexit off the table.

 

Most of Carney's speech focused on the outlook for the global economy. He said growth was likely to stabilize at a new, slower pace, although China, trade wars and rising protectionism threatened the "delicate equilibrium".

 

Britain could be seen as a "leading indicator" of a reversal of globalization and if that uncertainty took hold elsewhere, it could undermine the global economy, Carney said.

 

Rising debt in China was also a "significant and growing" risk. But the most likely outcome was that the world economy would not slow much further, he said.

 

"While there are pockets of risk and global growth is still decelerating, the combination of the policy response and the state of the current imbalances in advanced economies suggest that global growth is more likely than not to stabilize eventually around its new, modest trend," Carney said.

 

He also took a swipe at U.S. President Donald Trump who said trade wars were "good, and easy to win" last year. "Contrary to what you might have heard, it isn’t easy to win a trade war," Carney said.

 

(Writing by Andy Bruce; Editing by Gareth Jones and Alison Williams)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-02-13
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JAG said:

At times it is difficult to listen to one's self, let alone anyone else, with all the squawking coming from the little game bird ...

 

You have an audible computer? 

 

Ah, should have realized. You can't even see through the Shins let alone Barmy Boris, Farage and jolly empire boys! ????

Edited by Baerboxer
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bank of England is a privately owned bank. Carney is simply dancing to the tune of the stakeholders (shareholders).

 

The bank has special privileges and does not have to file any reports what-so-ever. It is protected by the UK official secret's act and just having a list of shareholders can get you arrested.

 

 

Edited by owl sees all
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

The Bank of England is a privately owned bank. Carney is simply dancing to the tune of the stakeholders (shareholders).

 

The bank has special privileges and does not have to file any reports what-so-ever. It is protected by the UK official secret's act and just having a list of shareholders can get you arrested.

 

 

The B of E did start life (400 years ago?) as a private bank, but it was nationalised after WW2.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

The Bank of England is a privately owned bank. Carney is simply dancing to the tune of the stakeholders (shareholders).

 

The bank has special privileges and does not have to file any reports what-so-ever. It is protected by the UK official secret's act and just having a list of shareholders can get you arrested.

 

 

so it's set up to launder money with impunity? not saying it does but that setup suggests criminality (of any sort) would go unimpeded..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...