Jump to content

British lawmakers overwhelmingly back Brexit delay


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, dunroaming said:

We are on the back foot and have been pretty much so from day one because of the way the "negotiations" were approached.

 

But we really do need an extension now, even if May get's her poisonous deal through next week.  There is no way there is enough time to dot the i's and cross the T's before the end of the month.  We just stagger along from one crisis to the next.  At the moment May has the upper hand but that may change soon enough.

 

It is so embarrassing to stand by and watch these incompetents screwing up our country. 

 

I posted this on the "Farage" thread by mistake. Very worthwhile listening to this Yorkshire Physics teacher who thinks Corbyn is a weasel and a goblin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

This is totally sick. They are trying to subvert democracy. I will not stand by and see my vote tossed aside by these self serving snobs. We voted to save Britain and save Britishness. We did not vote to continue wiping out all we hold dear, in the name of some social experiment.  Luckily, our quiver is not out of arrows.

 

You are watching democracy in action - the UK's representative constitutional democracy in which parliament is sovereign.  Unfortunately parliament is populated by a bunch of self interested numbskull arrogant clowns at the moment - but then we have to vote them out.

 

Watch you gonna do? Your really think the government or parliament give a toss about what some expat thinks on a website?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, baansgr said:

Feel sorry for all the remoaners that stocked their pantries full with food  avoiding starvation because  of leaving.....maybe have to take it all down the food banks. 

easier taking it to spoonies if ya passing before 1800 as thats where the lazy druggy benefit scrounging brexiteers will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, baansgr said:

Feel sorry for all the remoaners that stocked their pantries full with food  avoiding starvation because  of leaving.....maybe have to take it all down the food banks. 

I have not stocked my pantry... You just proved a point you Leavers are living in the past, we do not have pantries anymore...????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Isn't he in jail? Can convicted criminals stand for parliament?

 

The "Representation of the Peoples Act 1981" 

Quote

Disqualification of certain offenders for membership of the House of Commons.

A person found guilty of one or more offences (whether before or after the passing of this Act and whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere), and sentenced or ordered to be imprisoned or detained indefinitely or for more than one year, shall be disqualified for membership of the House of Commons while detained anywhere in the British Islands or the Republic of Ireland in pursuance of the sentence or order or while unlawfully at large at a time when he would otherwise be so detained.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/34/section/1

Although he has many convictions there is as I see it only one conviction that would bar him from standing and that is his 18 months for an insurance fraud as the 13 months for the contempt of court has been overturned and he is waiting a retrial on that.

 

Clearly assaulting a police officer, being a football hooligan, using someone else identity, and being a thug does not bar one from becoming an MP.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dunroaming said:

<snip>

even if May get's her poisonous deal through next week.

In two other topics I have asked many of your fellow Brexiteers to explain the specifics of what they consider to be wrong with May's deal and with what they would replace them.

 

All bar one have either ignored the question, dodged it or made feeble excuses for not answering; one being that the person couldn't be bothered to read even a summery of what is in the deal!

 

Will you now grasp the nettle and answer the question?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, 7by7 said:

In two other topics I have asked many of your fellow Brexiteers to explain the specifics of what they consider to be wrong with May's deal and with what they would replace them.

 

All bar one have either ignored the question, dodged it or made feeble excuses for not answering; one being that the person couldn't be bothered to read even a summery of what is in the deal!

 

Will you now grasp the nettle and answer the question?

Just my view.

My stance has always been UK get out deal or no deal.

The recent latest deal I know only had few tweaks to it and I cannot see why it wouldn't be accepted.

 

To me when I heard the house clowns cheer when it was mentioned about having another referendum it's just seems to me that many want to stay in the EU regardless of what the UK people and maybe their constituency voted for. 

 

As for the deal being excepted and UK gets out EU what does it matter whoever is Prime Minister down the line they can scrap it like Trump does, maybe his advice to her was get a deal EU and the house likes and get out.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 7by7 said:

In two other topics I have asked many of your fellow Brexiteers to explain the specifics of what they consider to be wrong with May's deal and with what they would replace them.

 

All bar one have either ignored the question, dodged it or made feeble excuses for not answering; one being that the person couldn't be bothered to read even a summery of what is in the deal!

 

Will you now grasp the nettle and answer the question?

The problems with the May/eu deal have been pointed out by media/lawyers and posters - I'm not sure how you have missed out on this?

 

Like most posters I'm getting tired of reading (and posting) the same arguments over and over again....

 

But once again, I'll point out that the most obvious example is that the May/eu deal leaves the uk reliant on the eu AGREEING that the Ireland border issues meet the eu's demands.....

 

In other words, they can refuse to agree for eternity....  Plus paying 39bn for the privilege of remaining, as the deal is BRINO.

 

Hopefully this answers your frequently repeated question.

Edited by dick dasterdly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Loiner said:


Oh horrors. The arch villain must have defrauded millions or even billions to be sentenced to 18 months for insurance fraud. Maybe it was even worse than that, even something like a mortgage fraud to get such a stretch. Or it could have been politically motivated charges and sentencing, because he’s an enemy of the state.


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

I do not think defrauding mortgage companies of £640,000 as a simple misdemeanor nor can anyone in their right mind say it was politically motivated.

 

Yesterday he lost his case against Cambridgeshire police for harassment...

Quote

The 36-year-old was at the pub with his children in August 2016 when a dispersal order was used.

He told Peterborough County Court he felt he was "targeted by police because of my beliefs", but an officer on duty that day said Mr Yaxley-Lennon was among a group of Luton fans in the pub who were identified by police as "risk" supporters.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/breaking-tommy-robinson-loses-harassment-14140649

He has convictions for football hooliganism related offences, should be banned from football grounds and being anywhere near one on match days.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has convictions for football hooliganism related offences, should be banned from football grounds and being anywhere near one on match days.
 
 

Managed to defraud 640k from mortgage companies? Doesn’t ring true to me. That would have been quite an achievement. Does anybody ever come out on top against the lenders?
Hooligans banned from football grounds? There’d be nobody left on the pitch or terraces.



Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dick dasterdly said:

The problems with the May/eu deal have been pointed out by media/lawyers and posters - I'm not sure how you have missed out on this?

 

Like most posters I'm getting tired of reading (and posting) the same arguments over and over again....

 

But once again, I'll point out that the most obvious example is that the May/eu deal leaves the uk reliant on the eu AGREEING that the Ireland border issues meet the eu's demands.....

 

In other words, they can refuse to agree for eternity....  Plus paying 39bn for the privilege of remaining, as the deal is BRINO.

 

Hopefully this answers your frequently repeated question.

The UK has a debt of £39Billion arising from commitments the UK have made during the UK’s membership of the EU (these include Farage’s EMP pension).

 

Quit with this blatant lie that the payment of this debt has anything to do with anything other than commitments already made.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Loiner said:


Managed to defraud 640k from mortgage companies? Doesn’t ring true to me. That would have been quite an achievement. Does anybody ever come out on top against the lenders?
Hooligans banned from football grounds? There’d be nobody left on the pitch or terraces.



Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Proven in open court before a jury of his peers.

 

Get over it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proven in open court before a jury of his peers.
 
Get over it.

Was it really? I don’t believe you. Please give details of how much he ‘made’ from his fraud. Details of how too, because I could do with a few quid out of a mortgage company.
Help me over it.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Loiner said:


Was it really? I don’t believe you. Please give details of how much he ‘made’ from his fraud. Details of how too, because I could do with a few quid out of a mortgage company.
Help me over it.

He was convicted in an open court before a jury of his peers.

 

That your poster boy is a convicted fraudster is s matter of court record.

 

I don’t owe you an explanation of any more detail than that fact.

 

Get over it already.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Proven in open court before a jury of his peers.

 

Get over it.

The fraud was that when he applied for a mortgage , he submitted false playslips to obtain a loan, a loan that he would have paid back had he received the loan 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...