Future Forward spokeswoman advised to read more before making public comments

[wreckingcountry]

ass licking professor

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

 

[Mavideol]

her questions were logical, she didn't know that's why she asked, if she had known  she wouldn't ask anybody and everybody does the same when not knowing something they ask.... wonder what party affiliation that assistant professor has, Prayut maybe?

[allen303]

•  

• Report post
•  
•  #1

Posted 16 hours ago

Future Forward spokeswoman advised to read more before making public comments

 

 

An economics professor at Chulalongkorn University has rebuked Future Forward spokeswoman Pannika “Chor” Wanich and advised her to equip herself with knowledge before making public comments “just for the sake of occupying media space.”

 

 

 

As for green arrangements, Piti explained that there are no hotels in Bangkok which have thousands of chairs for the summit participants and many trucks would have been used to bring the chairs to the meeting venue. This time, pulp paper chairs, which are light and reusable, were appropriate.

 

Well I will admit I am not an expert on paper chairs but,

Were those chairs produced at the hotel? If not, how did they get there. I would guess they would take up to or very close to the same space on a truck? No hotels in Bangkok have thousands of chairs for a meeting? Light and reusable verses heavy and reusable.

[Bluespunk]

21 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Indeed. 

 

But questions asked after reading / watching available information sources tend to be better.

 

Maybe this lady watched the video and did some research. Maybe she is just firing off questions.

 

She and her party are new. We'll see their substance and competence over time.

Before, after, during, questions are welcome at any time. 

[Eligius]

These sycophantic junta-lovers, worshippers of the decimation of democracy, of the squashing and smashing of ordinary Thai people and their natural-born rights - make me want to vomit.

 

Chulalongkorn: never yet found a cause that was not too reactionary, too autocratic, too d.. di... dinosaur-like for it to throw its fetid and flatulent weight behind. Remember their Hitler 'super-hero' murals of just a handful of years ago? I do! And how they tried to justify and defend them.

 

The future (long-term) does not belong to slime creatures from odious Establishment institutions, but belongs to the likes of Future Forward and the young students who DARE to envision what a progressive Thailand and humane (not monstrously oppressive) governance COULD and SHOULD be like ...

 

 

 

Edited June 28, 2019 by Eligius

[Jack100]

FFP may make a few mistakes but they have time on their side ........lots of time !

[Guest Jerry787]

" ......Why were recycled paper chairs used at the summit, Why were recycled paper chairs used at the summit, ..."


after such statement, a conclusion comes up, Future Forward Party deserve not to be voted.

[candide]

48 minutes ago, allen303 said:

•  

• Report post
•  
•  #1

Posted 16 hours ago

Future Forward spokeswoman advised to read more before making public comments

 

 

An economics professor at Chulalongkorn University has rebuked Future Forward spokeswoman Pannika “Chor” Wanich and advised her to equip herself with knowledge before making public comments “just for the sake of occupying media space.”

 

 

 

As for green arrangements, Piti explained that there are no hotels in Bangkok which have thousands of chairs for the summit participants and many trucks would have been used to bring the chairs to the meeting venue. This time, pulp paper chairs, which are light and reusable, were appropriate.

 

Well I will admit I am not an expert on paper chairs but,

 

Were those chairs produced at the hotel? If not, how did they get there. I would guess they would take up to or very close to the same space on a truck? No hotels in Bangkok have thousands of chairs for a meeting? Light and reusable verses heavy and reusable.

Quite relevant comment. It seems this yellow faculty member is talking green B.S. No wonder he's still assistant.

Actually, it is also possible that Pannika was quite knowledgeable about the deals in question and knew there was something fishy about them.

With all the laws introduced by the Junta and the courts in ambush, it is safer for FFP members only to 'ask questions'.

[DrTuner]

Read more, as in read more Animal Farm? Napoleon is getting angry, eh? Just don't have a sandwich with it.

[DrTuner]

3 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

What is irresponsible about asking questions in order to find answers to something you do not understand?

 

I encourage my students to use this strategy to increase their knowledge, understanding and grasp of a problem they are engaged in solving. 

Good strategy. Good answers are easy, good questions are hard.

[pornprong]

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 Maybe the spokeswoman did watch the video and maybe she asked these questions as a result.

 

We shall have to wait until she answers the professor.

 

Applying derogatory adjectives to someone challenging a political party spokeswoman adds nothing to your comments but detracts much.

It is indeed a cheap shot to call him a fat dude.

 

A point though,

 

Expecting to very quickly find an example of hypocrisy for ad hominem attacks I looked into your posting history and stumbled across this brilliancy on the very first page (350) I looked at:

 

"Hmmm. Wonder how the foreign governments will react as this government continues to remove checks and balances, reduce freedom of speech, ignores the rule of law and progresses to the one party state vision of its great thinker. I remember many foreign governments had no problem with the Robert Mugabe government when it came to power. Another great man of the people democrat who successfully milked a country." -Baerboxer May 29 2013

 

You are of course not posting about the lovely Prayuth here, but about the government of that dictator wannabe Yingluck. How hilarious that in your support of removing the last elected government in Thailand to prevent rule by a government that  "continues to remove checks and balances, reduce freedom of speech, ignores the rule of law and progresses to the one party state vision of its great thinker"  we find ourselves in exactly that situation.

 

It comes as no surprise that you would be supporting some fat chunker in his attempts to prevent questions being asked about what exactly the one party government is doing.

 

EDIT - your post history is hilarious, especially around the period of Suthep's street mobs - your comments have not aged well.

Edited June 28, 2019 by pornprong

[rkidlad]

24 minutes ago, pornprong said:

It is indeed a cheap shot to call him a fat dude.

 

A point though,

 

Expecting to very quickly find an example of hypocrisy for ad hominem attacks I looked into your posting history and stumbled across this brilliancy on the very first page (350) I looked at:

 

"Hmmm. Wonder how the foreign governments will react as this government continues to remove checks and balances, reduce freedom of speech, ignores the rule of law and progresses to the one party state vision of its great thinker. I remember many foreign governments had no problem with the Robert Mugabe government when it came to power. Another great man of the people democrat who successfully milked a country." -Baerboxer May 29 2013

 

You are of course not posting about the lovely Prayuth here, but about the government of that dictator wannabe Yingluck. How hilarious that in your support of removing the last elected government in Thailand to prevent rule by a government that  "continues to remove checks and balances, reduce freedom of speech, ignores the rule of law and progresses to the one party state vision of its great thinker"  we find ourselves in exactly that situation.

 

It comes as no surprise that you would be supporting some fat chunker in his attempts to prevent questions being asked about what exactly the one party government is doing.

 

EDIT - your post history is hilarious, especially around the period of Suthep's street mobs - your comments have not aged well.

 

The internet doesn't forget. 

[robblok]

2 hours ago, pornprong said:

Look at you still desperately trying to find ways to surreptitiously support the junta.

 

The article does not offer any information as to whether Panika watched the video or not, it just states "he wondered if Ms. Pannika had seen it" - you just assume that because she is anti-junta she must be in the wrong and because the fat dude is defending the junta, he is right.

 

How about, the least you should do, before posting, is read and understand the article you are going to comment on without letting your prejudices get in the way of the facts.

 

Posting comments is good, but not if you haven't done your homework before.

 

That said, do you think the video addressed:

1. Why Prayuth broke with tradition and did not provide an interpreter for foreign media at his press conference?

2. Is there an improper relationship between Prayuth and the hotel's owner (the Singha beer billionaire)

3. Who profited from the paper chairs?

 

 

This has nothing to do with junta right or wrong, in general I think they are wrong. I think its wrong to ask questions when you havent looked at an video that has the answers already. 

 

Your questions are not the questions the spokes person asked they were about it being green or not and that was in the video. Asking about an improper relation between Prayut and the hotel's owner is a good one. Who benefited from the paper chairs is also a good one but those were not the questions asked.

 

I just think its foolish for a spokesperson not to watch all data available before asking questions. I guess its something that I have learned as an accountant / tax adviser first reading all data then asking questions. That is something that has been drilled into me to first examine available data and then shoot my mouth. I was only questioning how she does her job not who is right or wrong. I guess you can't get over your bias. I am a big FFW fan but unlike you I am not blind for faults at the side I like. Guess you have become Thai only attacking one side and forgiving faults of the other side. I dont base who is right and wrong on political leaning.

 

Again my beef was only about not doing due diligence before asking questions. Not with asking questions or attacking the junta. 

[pornprong]

7 minutes ago, robblok said:

This has nothing to do with junta right or wrong, in general I think they are wrong. I think its wrong to ask questions when you havent looked at an video that has the answers already. 

 

Your questions are not the questions the spokes person asked they were about it being green or not and that was in the video. Asking about an improper relation between Prayut and the hotel's owner is a good one. Who benefited from the paper chairs is also a good one but those were not the questions asked.

 

I just think its foolish for a spokesperson not to watch all data available before asking questions. I guess its something that I have learned as an accountant / tax adviser first reading all data then asking questions. That is something that has been drilled into me to first examine available data and then shoot my mouth. I was only questioning how she does her job not who is right or wrong. I guess you can't get over your bias. I am a big FFW fan but unlike you I am not blind for faults at the side I like. Guess you have become Thai only attacking one side and forgiving faults of the other side. I dont base who is right and wrong on political leaning.

 

Again my beef was only about not doing due diligence before asking questions. Not with asking questions or attacking the junta. 

You don't know if she watched the video or not.

I'll just repeat that here, one more time, just for you.

You don't know if she watched the video or not.

 

In addition to that, most of her questions have nothing to do with the "green" aspect of the location of the ASEAN summit, for example, why did Prayuth not have translators at his press conference for the foreign media that were present? How is a video about tree hugging relevant here? 

 

Before you answer, as an accountant / tax adviser - go back and re-read the article, notice it does not state whether or not she has watched the video, then ask your questions.

 

Now, what's your beef (because it certainly can't be about Pannika's research because there is no information in the article that informs the reader as to what research she has or has not done, there's just a fat turds ponderings on the subject)?

 

It really does appear your beef is that someone has had the temerity to question the Junta's integrity.

[rkidlad]

1 hour ago, robblok said:

This has nothing to do with junta right or wrong, in general I think they are wrong. I think its wrong to ask questions when you havent looked at an video that has the answers already. 

 

Your questions are not the questions the spokes person asked they were about it being green or not and that was in the video. Asking about an improper relation between Prayut and the hotel's owner is a good one. Who benefited from the paper chairs is also a good one but those were not the questions asked.

 

I just think its foolish for a spokesperson not to watch all data available before asking questions. I guess its something that I have learned as an accountant / tax adviser first reading all data then asking questions. That is something that has been drilled into me to first examine available data and then shoot my mouth. I was only questioning how she does her job not who is right or wrong. I guess you can't get over your bias. I am a big FFW fan but unlike you I am not blind for faults at the side I like. Guess you have become Thai only attacking one side and forgiving faults of the other side. I dont base who is right and wrong on political leaning.

 

Again my beef was only about not doing due diligence before asking questions. Not with asking questions or attacking the junta. 

People give steven100 a lot of grief on here, me included. But I’ll take someone who’s ridiculous but honest, over someone who’s simply disingenuous, anytime. 

[JAG]

2 hours ago, pornprong said:

a fat dude.

 

2 hours ago, rkidlad said:

some fat chunker

Come now Pornprong, why so pejorative? Statuesque and learned would be more appropriate adjectives for this worthy and righteous scion of the educational establishment!

 

What is more, I understand that he is in the running for the chair (recyclable and made from paper obviously) of the soon to be established Faculty for Supellectilem Origami!

 

Show some respect.

Edited June 28, 2019 by JAG

[Reigntax]

10 hours ago, marcusarelus said:

What's his name on ThaiVisa?

Steven100

[DrTuner]

6 hours ago, rkidlad said:

People give steven100 a lot of grief on here, me included. But I’ll take someone who’s ridiculous but honest, over someone who’s simply disingenuous, anytime. 

Yes, makes it far easier to categorize 'em into the paid troll/brainwashed but harmless section. A nice time saver.