Jump to content

Thailand given 3 years to resolve 3 issues before resubmitting KKFC proposal


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thailand given 3 years to resolve 3 issues before resubmitting KKFC proposal

 

WeLovePaKaengKrachan2.jpg

(Photo) We Love Kaeng Kracha Facebook page

 

Former Thai ambassador to France, and head of the Thai delegation at the World Heritage Committee meeting (WHC), Mr. Sihasak Phuangketkeow, reported today (July 8th) that the UNESCO WHC has asked Thailand to work on three main issues before it resubmits the proposal for Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex to be listed as a natural world heritage site.

 

Yesterday, the UNESCO’s 43rd WHC meeting, in Azerbaijan’s capital of Baku decided not to list the KKFC as a natural world heritage site this year.

 

Mr. Sihasak said that the WHC decided, as recommended by the 6-country working committee appointed by the 21-member WHC, to refer the Thai proposal back to the state parties to allow for revisions and the gathering of additional information. The proposal will be resubmitted to the Committee within a 3-year timeframe.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/thailand-given-3-years-to-resolve-3-issues-before-resubmitting-kkfc-proposal/

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-07-08
  • Haha 1
Posted

It is amazing just how blemished the facts are in reporting- these are the FACTS

 

a. the rights of “indigenous” Karen people living within the KKFC. This report presented to UNESCO in July 2016 gives an indication of the sorts of things which it is claimed by some pressure groups have been occurring. Thailand, is taking action to involve locals (and disputing the allegations made in the above report) but also claims that many of the complaining Karen shouldn’t even be in Thailand.

b. the frontier with Myanmar, which claims that 34% of the proposed site lies within its territory. It isn’t clear how much the lack of an agreed KKFC boundary relates to deep seated differences and how much to the practicalities of surveying a border (remembering that Myanmar has been fighting insurgencies in the border areas for decades - with those insurgents often "supported" by Thailand), but this would not seem likely to be a quick matter to resolve. UNESCO claims that inscription has no impact on territorial claims but would Thailand want to try to “do a Cambodia” on this one? Another possibility of course might be for Thailand to reduce the nominated area to exclude the disputed sections - but that might be construed as either conceding territory to Myanmar and/or reducing the "natural integrity" of the nomination in the eyes of IUCN which has already suggested that Thailand should work "in partnership with the State Party of Myanmar, between the nominated property and neighbouring transnational protected areas within the Taninthaya Forest Corridor in Myanmar"

Posted
17 hours ago, lungbing said:

Ah, so not Khon Kaen Football Club then.

Or, as I thought a new name for the Klu Klux <deleted> Clan either!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...