20 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

All years old. Try quoting something published after she betrayed her parliament an her son hit the headlines yet again.

2019 is not all years old. You can't even be man enough to admit it when you are completely wrong. On the ignore button.

Edited August 30, 20196 yr by Laughing Gravy

1 minute ago, Laughing Gravy said:

On the ignore button.

I wish!

14 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

He is Dominic Cummings not Boris the buffoon. Cummings has never been a member of a political party and has always prostituted himself by working for whoever will pay him a wage. Also speaks Russian and is a fan of all things Russia.

Smart people surround themselves with smarter people.

 

Boris Johnson hiring Cummings shows that Johnson is no fool. The pair of them are running rings around the Remainers and their strategy to overturn the democratic vote.

12 minutes ago, Joe Mcseismic said:

If you took a census now, I really don't think it would be much different.

Most people understand that she has to rubber-stamp whatever is put in front of her.

If she starts showing bias, that will be a sure way for her popularity to wane.

She did show bias by approving the removal of parliamentary democracy. And she did have a choice.

3 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

She did show bias by approving the removal of parliamentary democracy. And she did have a choice.

If she didn't rubber stamp it, she would have been accused of bias from the Brexit supporters, so, no, she didn't really have a choice. She continued with a policy that she has never gone against during her entire reign.

3 minutes ago, Joe Mcseismic said:

If she didn't rubber stamp it, she would have been accused of bias from the Brexit supporters, so, no, she didn't really have a choice. She continued with a policy that she has never gone against during her entire reign.

And now she's accused of bias by the majority of MPs. Prorogueing parliament for the purpose of preventing debate on a no deal Brexit was a political act. Not what proroguing is intended for. She should have denied it on the grounds that she cannot get involved in party politics. In proroguing parliament, she clearly did this.

 

15 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

And now she's accused of bias by the majority of MPs. Prorogueing parliament for the purpose of preventing debate on a no deal Brexit was a political act. Not what proroguing is intended for. She should have denied it on the grounds that she cannot get involved in party politics. In proroguing parliament, she clearly did this.

 

Clear as mud. More totally unsupported mere opinion. Marvellous.

19 hours ago, Nigel Garvie said:

I'd rather you had described it as the English cancer, although I realize that the record of the former Scots in NI is nothing to be proud of. We are working hard to get rid of the same malignancy in Scotland also.

If I’m honest, I write ‘british’, but I’m thinking english. 

11 hours ago, citybiker said:

Would that be the same cowardly act that John Major previously carried out when he prorogued parliament?

 

Only difference here is circumstances, this prologue is slightly longer but still legal.

 

The EU is doing it's usual default setting however I for one don't think it will collapse however it will continue to face struggles without reform.

 

Sent from my SM-T555 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

You are correct, they were both cowardly. 

with all these clowns crying foul may i remind them that democracy died in the UK 3 years ago.

Yawn. Find another meme.

You have posted this nonsense at least once a day for the last three years (but no one has ever accused a brexiter of imagination)

Sent from my SM-N950F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

In order to neuter Bercow on day one next week Johnson will no doubt produce a white rabbit at the dispatch box re the historic bullying allegations that aren't going away.

 

The Mogg is polite as ever in this clip but even he seems to have had enough of it...

 

If you ask her them very nicely they might let Ireland join the Commonwealth.

In other news, Boris, bolstered by his fellow coup leader Prayut, is considering declaring Section 44, and starting a TM30 program to track the dirty foreigners.

Sent from my SM-N950F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

17 hours ago, Forethat said:

You can read more about United Kingdoms unwritten constitution at the British Library web site:

https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/britains-unwritten-constitution

 

Enjoy!

 

Another happy customer...

did you read my post end of 1st paragraph where it says exactly what you posted, both saying exactly the same thing, what's the point you are trying to make.... UK has an unwritten constitution thus not having a codified constitution, in other words no constitution

On 8/29/2019 at 5:07 AM, webfact said:

Cheered on by U.S President Donald Trump......

and this being a reference for making UK people happy 555

5 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Even in Farage is right about Johnson the damage is done. Leaving the EU is destined. If Johnson does fudge it then the rise of the Brexit party will be phenomenal IMHO. 

 

I think Farage has stated this, to ensure Johnson keeps to his word.

 

If only the EU egotistical side could see that they would be best to let the UK leave. The constant trying to keep the UK in, has never worked and won't work.

 

I can see this is the remainers last chance of trying to thwart the democratic result of 2016. How ironic they go on about democracy but only when it suits them.

 

After the 31st October bring on a GE and lets see how many get the boot, from their constituents.

 

The only thing I cannot understand is why Boris didn't simply sign a consent order supporting Robin Tilbrooks Miller-esque case if he's serious about no deal. 

13 minutes ago, evadgib said:

The only thing I cannot understand is why Boris didn't simply sign a consent order supporting Robin Tilbrooks Miller-esque case if he's serious about no deal. 

there's only ONE thing you don't understand about BJ  555

 

11 minutes ago, evadgib said:

The only thing I cannot understand is why Boris didn't simply sign a consent order supporting Robin Tilbrooks Miller-esque case if he's serious about no deal. 

You do seem to have a thing about Tilbrook, founder of the English Democrats, a large percentage of who's members are defectors from the BNP. Their main aim is to have an English parliament. They may yet get their wish by default. Being the nonentety he is (his party has around 1000 members), the case you constantly refer to was laughed out of court.

 

I can see why you're a fan.

3 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

You do seem to have a thing about Tilbrook, founder of the English Democrats, a large percentage of who's members are defectors from the BNP. Their main aim is to have an English parliament. They may yet get their wish by default. Being the nonentety he is (his party has around 1000 members), the case you constantly refer to was laughed out of court.

 

I can see why you're a fan.

You (in your various guises) seem to have an obsession with brexiteers ????

Edited August 30, 20196 yr by evadgib

1 minute ago, evadgib said:

You (in your various guises) seem to have an obsession with brexiteers ????

Ooh, touched a nerve, have I? Well at least you're not denying the truth about Tilbrook. There's plenty more if you wish me to continue. 555

1 hour ago, Joe Mcseismic said:

If she didn't rubber stamp it, she would have been accused of bias from the Brexit supporters, so, no, she didn't really have a choice. She continued with a policy that she has never gone against during her entire reign.

which is ??????

28 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

You do seem to have a thing about Tilbrook, founder of the English Democrats, a large percentage of who's members are defectors from the BNP. Their main aim is to have an English parliament. They may yet get their wish by default. Being the nonentety he is (his party has around 1000 members), the case you constantly refer to was laughed out of court.

 

I can see why you're a fan.

And I can see why you prefer insults to answering interesting questions....

 

The court cases supporting the remain cause receive full media coverage, whereas Tilbrook's case was barely mentioned.

 

Evadgib raised an interesting point:-

 

45 minutes ago, evadgib said:

The only thing I cannot understand is why Boris didn't simply sign a consent order supporting Robin Tilbrooks Miller-esque case if he's serious about no deal. 

 

Personally, I think it is because Boris is looking for May's agreement - with only a few tweaks on the backstop.

Edited August 30, 20196 yr by dick dasterdly

2 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

Ooh, touched a nerve, have I? Well at least you're not denying the truth about Tilbrook. There's plenty more if you wish me to continue. 555

Don't flatter yourself pal. Banter is preferred but sadly it's devoid on your side in favour of insults & repetitive baiting.

3 minutes ago, <deleted> dasterdly said:

And I can see why you prefer insults to answering interesting questions....

 

The court cases supporting the remain cause receive full media coverage, whereas Tilbrooks case was barely mentioned.

 

What insults?

 

I did answer the question. Gina Miller had a valid case which she won in court. It was an important milestone in the brexit proceedings. Of course it was widely reported on.

 

Tilbrook's case was a completely spurious argument, a joke. As I said, it was laughed out of court. No one took it seriously. Only a newspaper like the Sun would report on such nonsense.

 

Clear now?

5 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Just the government enacting on a referendum. By the way what about your country and referendums? They just tell them to vote again. You have the audacity to say the UK hasn't improved. It is miles ahead of Ireland and you know it.

Unfortunately you didn't read the bottom part! 

20 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

What insults?

 

I did answer the question. Gina Miller had a valid case which she won in court. It was an important milestone in the brexit proceedings. Of course it was widely reported on.

 

Tilbrook's case was a completely spurious argument, a joke. As I said, it was laughed out of court. No one took it seriously. Only a newspaper like the Sun would report on such nonsense.

 

Clear now?

Can't be bothered to point out how you were trying to insult the poster...

 

You didn't answer the question raised, but in response to these comments in your above post:-

 

"Gina Miller had a valid case"/"Tilbrook's case was a completely spurious argument, a joke"

 

Please explain your reasoning as to why one was valid, and the other a spurious joke.

Edited August 30, 20196 yr by dick dasterdly

1 minute ago, <deleted> dasterdly said:

Can't be bothered to point out how you were trying to insult the poster...

 

You didn't answer the question raised, but in response to these comments in your above post:-

 

"Gina Miller had a valid case"/"Tilbrook's case was a completely spurious argument, a joke" - please explain your reasoning as to why one was valid, and the other spurious.

Well if you can't be bothered, neither can I.

 

Suffice it to say that Gina Miller won her case, and Tilbrook's was thrown out of court. I wouldn't insult the intelligence of TVF readers by going into the turgid details of Tilbrooks case. I'll leave that to you.

5 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Well you are now quoting a luvvy who enjoys getting BJ's in cars by 'ladies of the night' as an authourity of being British. the man is a twerp of the highest order, who doesn't know what the working person is about. Besides your usual anti British rants this has to be the funniest. Thank you.

Oh dear, and what about Randy Andy? The royal pet raping under age girls? Is this funny too? 

6 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

In your dreams.

Yeah, dreams sometimes come true. 

Here's a new pair of fashionable affordable "for some" prorogue's for the discerning Tory to walk all over your best interest. There's also an EU steel toecap version available at 39bn????

 

 

 

 

6 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

In your dreams.

In your nightmares ... Brexit was a vote to dissolve the UK.