Jump to content

What options are left for British PM Johnson on Brexit?


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Basil B said:

Off to the Supreme Court now...

Have to queue behind Gina Miller and John Major

 

Should include Tony too, be a right ol' Trio of nonsense.........

Posted
3 minutes ago, Basil B said:

Off to the Supreme Court now...

Have to queue behind Gina Miller and John Major

 

Personally cant lose with this one.

If the court funds in favour of Gina Miller then great.

If the Supreme court in England overrules the Supreme court of Scotland then theres a few more 100 000 pro independence supporters created right there ???? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, transam said:

Blimey, who did he cadge the suit off, must have been taller than him...They should have loaned him some shoes too, builders boots just don't cut it....????

Better so …?

2019-01-11_165727.png

Posted
3 minutes ago, transam said:

So he has now let his hair grow, or is it a wig...????

He was rehearsing already in ultra secrecy . So it is never good for you isn't it? ,even when he looks as a conservative ????

Posted
2 minutes ago, david555 said:

mustn't scare the voters with what a no deal could imply must we.....Lying to the Queen eh...only Andrew is allowed to get away with that. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
9 hours ago, ballpoint said:

Johnson, and his cabinet, could resign on mass and emigrate to the US on October 31st, thus making good on their promise to leave the EU on that date.

they will be leaving the UK only not the EU 555

Posted
9 hours ago, Basil B said:

He has put a lot of the poison in it himself.

..... and yet he can't keep his mouth shut

  • Like 1
Posted
By taking 'No Deal' off the table 'Brexit' is not, in any real sense, now possible. 
 
The 'EU' has to agree the deal, the 'EU' wants the 'UK' to 'Remain', therefore any 'Deal' will require the 'UK' to effectively remain within the 'EU' as whatever 'Deal' they agree to, is one which leaves the 'UK' subject to all 'EU' rules and regulations, with 'No Voting'; or Remain as a fully participating member with a position even less advantageous than it has at present. 
 
All the EEC/EC/EU 'treaties' have pointed in one direction, a 'Federal State' ruled by a 'Federal' government at a massive cost to the tax payer.  
 
The duplicity of these 'MPs' who were elected via their parties manifestos to effect Brexit is destroying the public's trust in 'Parliament' and democracy. What a disgraceful and hypocritical lot they are.
  • Sad 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Victornoir said:

Stop with that.
It is obvious that the parliament should pass a law making the second referendum binding, definitive and immediately applicable with a pre-defined agenda.

 

That would require changing the constitution. Not a quick process.

Posted
2 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

mustn't scare the voters with what a no deal could imply must we.....Lying to the Queen eh...only Andrew is allowed to get away with that. 

 

To be fair, Johnson lies to everybody, regularly. So HMQ should not feel she was treated differently.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, whitemouse said:

Great observation! 

 

Also, do brexiteers even remember WHY they wanted to leave EU in the first place? What was the point, other than crashing UK's economy? Remember, all of this was ONLY to get rid of Polish and Romanian laborers? Do you enjoy the 'control' now? Was it worth it? Do brexiteers even realize Islamists do not enter UK from EU, Pakistan is not part of EU nor Schengen. 

 

At this point it seems one side simply wishes to 'win', even if winning means disaster for UK, it is almost like burning  down your own house because you no longer like the wallpaper.

Isn't the whole point of brexit to be a winner?

 

 

Posted

Great day for Leavers. The 17.4m who voted for our democratically elected Sovereign Parliament to take back control of lawmaking, and for independent UK courts to take back control of interpreting law.

Today your wishes have been implemented. Rejoice!

  • Haha 2
Posted
11 hours ago, JonnyF said:

3 most likely options are...

 

1. Challenge/test the law in the courts. Exit the EU while it's going through the process.

2. Let Britain veto it's own request for an extension. 

3. Convince one of the other member states to veto the request by threatening to become a menace in the European Parliament (veto everything, regularly demonstrate and ignore protocol etc.). The Brexit party can help with this.

 

Quite a few other options as well. This is far from over but the government are keeping quiet on which option they will take to avoid Parliament plotting against it. Good Luck Boris, together, the people and the government can overcome this colluding, traitorous Parliament,

 

Haha 

 

1) It would be expedited so no chance of that 

 

2) Illegal 

 

3) Never going to happen - infact the smart money is on a longer extension in order to kick it firmly into the long grass. 

 

Finally ‘the people’ ??? You seriously still think the U.K. populace still wants leave ?? It was only 25% in 2016, much less now. The games up - someone needs to put the leavers out of their misery.

 

Second referendum (which no assured leaver would reject) and we can all move on. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Libai said:
By taking 'No Deal' off the table 'Brexit' is not, in any real sense, now possible. 
 
The 'EU' has to agree the deal, the 'EU' wants the 'UK' to 'Remain', therefore any 'Deal' will require the 'UK' to effectively remain within the 'EU' as whatever 'Deal' they agree to, is one which leaves the 'UK' subject to all 'EU' rules and regulations, with 'No Voting'; or Remain as a fully participating member with a position even less advantageous than it has at present. 
 
All the EEC/EC/EU 'treaties' have pointed in one direction, a 'Federal State' ruled by a 'Federal' government at a massive cost to the tax payer.  
 
The duplicity of these 'MPs' who were elected via their parties manifestos to effect Brexit is destroying the public's trust in 'Parliament' and democracy. What a disgraceful and hypocritical lot they are.

Best stay in the EU then, if Parliament can't be trusted. Folks need to eat and pay bills while they continue to squabble. We need to be governed by someone.

So much for taking back control... 

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, whitemouse said:

Win what, though? How is leaving biggest economic union a win?

 

The only winner is Russia, weaker EU means stronger Russia. Biggest winner  in long term is China, it is easier to dictate trade terms with individual nations, next to China any European country is tiny and insignificant. 

I agree fully with you. But the brexiteers still think they are the Winners of this mess. 

 

That's important to notice.

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

British MP's are elected to represent their constituents. Not only the ones who voted for them but all their constituents. They are not elected as delegates of either the constituents or a political party. They, as representatives, must vote honestly and ethically in line with the own judgement and conscience.

 

The fact clown Cameron tried to blow an advisory consultative referendum into something it could never be, because he thought he'd get the result he wanted easily, is irrelevant.

So why are they not representing their constituents. Many Remain MPs of all parties are not supporting their constituencies who voted to leave. My MP in Taunton Deane is one of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...