Jump to content

EU Council will be too late to negotiate Brexit deal: French source


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Ok.

And with different laws, custom, etc. where would you put the border?

Or do you imagine that without any border there wouldn't be smugglers, people who cross the border illegally, etc.?

I'd have a customs checkpoint a few miles away from the border. You're never going to be able to 100% stop people crossing borders illegally or smuggling, any more than Thailand can stop people crossing over the hundreds of kms of border that separate Thailand from Cambodia, Laos or Myanmar with a suitcase/boat full of contraband.

 

We already have different VAT rates, currency etc. between the North and the Republic. Different rates on certain goods wouldn't be as big an issue as some are pretending, especially if the trade deal was comprehensive. After all, a free trade deal would negate the need for too many checks.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Basil B said:

True... but:

Brexit: MEPs overwhelmingly vote to support Article 50 extension should UK request one 

There is nothing the UK can before October 31st to get an agreement...

Although it is up to the leaders to agree, the resolution supporting an extension by MEP's is a good indicator that we will get it.  

Only one little tiny problem: it is NOT the Eur Parliament, who decides for a Brexit extention, but the EU Council, consisting out of the leaders of Government of the EU member states.

Second: ALL have to agree. One against = end of extensions. With 126 against = 18%... of 27 member states would be calculatively 5 against. Bye-bye.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, kingdong said:

Was obvious they were going to be awkward,just like they,beenfor the last 42 years.no deals better than a bad deal,these colours don,t run.

Correct. Finally import duty about everything from the Uk into the EU as WTO-rules, and Schengen visa for all "third country" visitors as the UK will be after 31 Oct. Good deal for the EU.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

Only one little tiny problem: it is NOT the Eur Parliament, who decides for a Brexit extention, but the EU Council, consisting out of the leaders of Government of the EU member states.

Second: ALL have to agree. One against = end of extensions. With 126 against = 18%... of 27 member states would be calculatively 5 against. Bye-bye.

Is in that E.U. council of leaders the U.K. present ?…. And do they have voting right on themselves …?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, bangrak said:

Allow me to add, there is/was/has been a deal, negotiated between the UK Government and the EU authorities, which was agreed on by both sides, end of story. ...Was it not that the leave camp 'traitors' inside the Conservative party (yes, these are the real ones!) voted against the deal negotiated by their own Conservative Government! This should not, never, be forgotten!

You forget a little tiny part: "and all other 27 EU member states agreed with it". 

But seen all accusations amoung the British about "traitors", time the British enjoy some time outside the EU.  

And after, the EU can negotiate the conditions of a new membership. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, blazes said:

 

Well, perhaps it would have been better to have held your tongue, since the label "sick man of Europe" was originally awarded to the Ottoman Empire courtesy of the much sicker man of Europe, Tsar Nicholas (of Winter Palace massacre fame).

When the label was applied to the UK it was in fact used by the Tories to get rid of Wilson and Callaghan's Labour Party.  (Though the Tories of Harold Macmillan's day were hardly examples of youth and energy.)

 

If anyone deserves a mention for the present healthy state of the Brit economy it is not the Brussels buffoons but dear old Maggie Thatcher, who radically changed the country round in the late 80s, not always for the better.

Time (again) to read first, and talk/write afterwards

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Boffey and Jennifer Rankin in Brussels

Fri 20 Sep 2019 11.13 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/20/fresh-brexit-talks-row-uk-eu-proposals-secret

Fresh Brexit talks row as UK asks EU to keep its proposals secret

Downing Street tells Brussels negotiators documents must not be shared with 27 states

 

Downing Street’s secrecy over its “underwhelming” Brexit proposals has caused a fresh rupture in the negotiations in Brussels.

 

The row centres on a demand that the EU’s negotiating team treat a long-awaited cache of documents outlining the UK’s latest ideas as “Her Majesty’s government property”.

 

The European commission team was told by Whitehall that the three “confidential” papers it had sent on Thursday evening should not be distributed to Brexit delegates representing the EU’s 27 other member states.

 

more...

Edited by david555
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Victornoir said:

You have no argument except hatred and insult.


Fortunately, you do not represent the British as a whole

 

 That said , his vote is as good, or as bad as yours ..

 

 

Edited by elliss
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Loiner said:


No. The traitors were the PM and those who allowed themselves to submit to the Merkel/May Surrender Treaty. We won’t forget that the ERG forced the collaborators to reveal the AG’s office legal opinion that we could be tied to the EU for ever. Even the LAB side voted against that trick deal.

As you and Dad's army slip into your dotage you'll probably even forget your name never mind the complications of a not to be signed 550 page BRINO so called Withdrawal Agreement.  But whilst you can Nigel will cheer your heart as he does his pantomime shows up and down the country to the sadly lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aright said:

The people in the UK want the cleanest break possible but are not anticipating there won't be any blood on the floor.

What we Leavers want is to be supreme and sovereign, making our own decisions and way in the world not indebted to someone else. This sounds like a "good deal" to us.

"Making our own decisions" answers all your questions. You may not agree with all the answers but that's the way government works. To participate in a democratic event by casting a vote, only then to attempt to subvert the result, shows a complete lack of principle and integrity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

No they don't at best 25% of the 'British People' want no deal which is about double the numbers that thought the moon landings were fake. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I hope not.

 

I said months ago that the backstop was a clever distraction. "Hey everyone, look over here at this terrible backstop, no need to look over there at all the other terrible parts of the WA."

 

Then at the final hour, the EU can pretend to have compromised by removing the backstop which was never required in the first place. 

 

A good negotiating tactic, I just hope the UK doesn't fall for it and makes a clean break.

Good thinking vote for Nigel and his clean break and get all your mates fired up as well. We are depending upon it (see avatar).

 

 

Edited by beautifulthailand99
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Forethat said:

Lousy comparison. If posters on here are representative of the average British remainer, at best 25% of them are aware of the moon landings to begin with...

'Another pointless all purpose insulting generalizations about remainers. Nothing actually germane to the issues at hand. I'm not going to make generalizations about Brexiters making clueless comments just because you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Forethat said:

Lousy comparison. If posters on here are representative of the average British remainer, at best 25% of them are aware of the moon landings to begin with...

No one on Thai Visa is representative of anything other than they like going to Thailand a lot (nudge, wink) eh..say no more. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, bristolboy said:

'Another pointless all purpose insulting generalizations about remainers. Nothing actually germane to the issues at hand. I'm not going to make generalizations about Brexiters making clueless comments just because you do.

That makes a change.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I think the UK leaving the EU and signing a mutually beneficial trade deal is the most sensible way forward. 

 

By leaving, I mean leave completely (Customs Union, Single market, ECJ jurisdiction etc.).

 

Trade continues (keeping Remainers happy as they put the economy above everything else) and Leavers are happy as we have full sovereignty.

 

I really don't think it's complicated if there is good will on both sides.

 

 

 

What you and many others cannot seem to grasp is the UK cannot leave on that basis.

If there ever is this "mutually beneficial trade deal" it will be the single market in disguise to maintain regulatory alignment across the open border.

Anything else can only create tension over the border and result in a reunified Ireland

With a reunified Ireland and an independent Scotland, those that voted to leave would get what they voted for. an Independent England. After all 15.2 million of the votes to leave were from England.

Brexit has always been about the will of the English people, Ireland, as a whole, and Scotland have never been anything other than a thorn in the flesh of brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, puipuitom said:

Time (again) to read first, and talk/write afterwards

I applaud you for reading nearly every left wing paper besides the Independent and Observer. So you still have some more reading to do.

 

Your readings remind me when a person says I read lots of magazines. The only thing they are from the top shelf of a newsagent. Then claim they don't have a biased point of view, especially after reading Razzle, Hustler and other adult magazines as they are all different.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...