Jump to content

Iran decries 'cowardly attack' on oil tanker


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Iran decries 'cowardly attack' on oil tanker

 

2019-10-12T184534Z_2_LYNXMPEF9B08U_RTROPTP_3_MIDEAST-IRAN-TANKER.JPG

FILE PHOTO: An undated picture shows the Iranian-owned Sabiti oil tanker sailing in Red Sea. National Iranian Oil Tanker Company via WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

 

DUBAI (Reuters) - An Iranian government spokesman on Saturday described as a "cowardly attack" an incident that Iranian media have called the apparent targeting by missiles of an Iranian-owned oil tanker, and said Iran would respond after the facts had been studied.

 

The tanker Sabiti was hit in Red Sea waters off Saudi Arabia on Friday, Iranian media have reported, an incident that could stoke friction in a region rattled by attacks on tankers and oil installations since May.

 

"Iran is avoiding haste, carefully examining what has happened and probing facts," government spokesman Ali Rabei was quoted as saying by the official news agency IRNA.

 

Separately, a senior security official said video evidence had provided leads about the incident, adding that the Sabiti was hit by two missiles, the semi-official news agency Fars reported.

 

"A special committee has been set up to investigate the attack on Sabiti... with two missiles and its report will soon be submitted to the authorities for decision," said Ali Shamkhani, secretary of Iran's top security body, according to Fars.

 

"Piracy and mischief on international waterways aimed at making commercial shipping insecure will not go unanswered," he said.

 

Rabei was quoted by IRNA as saying "an appropriate response will be given to the designers of this cowardly attack, but we will wait until all aspects of the plot are clarified".

 

Saudi Arabia said it received a distress message from the damaged tanker but the vessel kept moving and switched off its transponder before it could provide assistance, the state news agency SPA reported on Saturday.

 

Leakage of cargo from the tanker has been stopped as it heads for the Gulf, the semi-official news agency Mehr reported. "The tanker is heading for Persian Gulf waters and we hope it will enter Iranian waters safely," it quoted an unnamed official as saying.

 

Nasrollah Sardashti, head of National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) that owns the damaged tanker, said the crew were safe and the vessel would reach Iranian waters within 10 days, the Oil Ministry's news agency SHANA reported.

 

There was no claim of responsibility for the reported incident and it has yet to be independently confirmed.

 

It was the latest involving oil tankers in the Red Sea and Gulf region, and may ratchet up tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia, long-time regional adversaries fighting a proxy war in Yemen, which lies at the southern end of the Red Sea.

 

The United States, embroiled in a dispute with Iran over its nuclear plans, has blamed Iran for attacks on tankers in the Gulf in May and June as well as for strikes on Saudi oil sites in September. Tehran has denied having a role in any of them.

 

The U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, which operates in the region, said it was aware of the reports but had no further information.

 

The Iranian reports on Friday offered sometimes diverging accounts. State-run television, citing the national oil company, said the tanker was hit by missiles while denying a report they came from Saudi Arabia.

 

Iran's Foreign Ministry said the ship was hit twice, without saying what struck it. State television broadcast images from the Sabiti's deck saying they were taken after the attack but showing no visible damage. The ship's hull was not in view.

 

Oil prices rose on the news of the incident and industry sources said it could drive up already high shipping costs.

 

Political risk consultancy Eurasia Group said it did not have firm evidence about who may have been behind the incident.

 

"The proximity of the tanker at the time of the attack to Saudi Arabia’s Jeddah port might imply that the missiles could possibly have been launched from the kingdom.

 

"Another plausible theory is that it was an Israeli sabotage operation...The purpose would be to disrupt Iranian tanker activity in the Red Sea corridor as it heads towards the Suez Canal. A third possibility would be that the attack was conducted by a terrorist group," Eurasia said in a statement.

 

The Red Sea is a major global shipping route for oil and other trade, linking the Indian Ocean with the Mediterranean via the Suez Canal.

 

(Reporting by Dubai newsroom and Aziz El Yaakoubi; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Frances Kerry)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-10-13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, keith101 said:

Is it possible that a third party (such as Israel) that would like to start a war between Saudi Arabia and Iran ?

 

46 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

"Another plausible theory is that it was an Israeli sabotage operation...The purpose would be to disrupt Iranian tanker activity in the Red Sea corridor as it heads towards the Suez Canal

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, keith101 said:

Is it possible that a third party (such as Israel) that would like to start a war between Saudi Arabia and Iran ?

Yes Benjamin needs all the support to form a government , a war would be a distraction from Israels election dilemma .

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, keith101 said:

Is it possible that a third party (such as Israel) that would like to start a war between Saudi Arabia and Iran ?

 

7 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"Another plausible theory is that it was an Israeli sabotage operation...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Like it or not, it is a realistic suggestion. Nothing to do with them Jews btw, but with the state of Israel.

For someone known to post noting but anti Semitic and anti Israel rants totally realistic ????

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BestB said:

For someone known to post noting but anti Semitic and anti Israel rants totally realistic ????

You do realise that option was posted by Eurasia consultancy group?

Edited by stevenl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BestB said:

You do realize i have no idea what you keep going on about?

You were complaining about Israel being mentioned as a possible perpetrator by a poster and calling him anti-Semitic, I am pointing out to you that the possibility of Israeli involvement was mentioned in the OP.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

You were complaining about Israel being mentioned as a possible perpetrator by a poster and calling him anti-Semitic, I am pointing out to you that the possibility of Israeli involvement was mentioned in the OP.

That poster who you referring to is you and you are a known culprit to make antisemetic and anti Israel posts on every single occasion in every single thread.

 

What some consultancy group who can not even afford a decent website said is absolutely useless.

 

For anyone with any common sense it would make perfect sense and totally logical for Saudis or their proxies to hit the oil tanker in response to what Iran did or supposedly did or financed to damage Saudis

 

Not only Israel has nothing to gain by attacking Iranian oil tanker but is far away from where oil tanker was

 

That is assuming Iranians are not lying and did not damage it themselves to then start yet another chest beating session.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BestB said:

That poster who you referring to is you and you are a known culprit to make antisemetic and anti Israel posts on every single occasion in every single thread.

 

What some consultancy group who can not even afford a decent website said is absolutely useless.

 

For anyone with any common sense it would make perfect sense and totally logical for Saudis or their proxies to hit the oil tanker in response to what Iran did or supposedly did or financed to damage Saudis

 

Not only Israel has nothing to gain by attacking Iranian oil tanker but is far away from where oil tanker was

 

That is assuming Iranians are not lying and did not damage it themselves to then start yet another chest beating session.

 

No, it was not me that brought that up.

Your accusations are not worth any reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

No, it was not me that brought that up.

Your accusations are not worth any reaction.

No you right, you only supported the claim with words like "them jews" so you are totally innocent in this matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BestB said:

No you right, you only supported the claim with words like "them jews" so you are totally innocent in this matter

See post #6, I merely copied your words 'them jews'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BestB said:

As I said you are totally innocent , never made any anti Israel or anti Semitic  posts ????

Anti-Semitic, no, anti some Israeli policies, yes.

 

If an independent consultant gives Israeli involvement as a realistic option, other posters agree and you find that reason to claim anti-Semitism you'd better check the meaning of the word.

 

And that is my final word in this 'discussion' with you, I refuse to follow you and answer with insults and baseless claims.

Edited by stevenl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The semantics are not easy to follow.  So its not a cowardly attack to support a Yemeni drone attack on an oil terminal, but it is a cowardly attack to shoot a rocket at a tanker.

 

I'm think I'm getting the hang of it now.

Edited by Kinnock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stevenl said:

Anti-Semitic, no, anti Israeli policies, yes.

 

If an independent consultant gives Israeli involvement as a realistic option, other posters agree and you find that reason to claim anti-Semitism you'd better check the meaning of the word.

 

And that is my final word in this 'discussion' with you, I refuse to follow you and answer with insults and baseless claims.

Give me credentials of this independent consultant ????

 

Indeed for the best it is your final word 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, stevenl said:

Like it or not, it is a realistic suggestion. Nothing to do with them Jews btw, but with the state of Israel.

 

It's just as "realistic" to suggest an Iranian False Flag - Iranian regime not exactly known for telling the truth.

 

Or Saudi response. State before that there's no way you'll resort to violence. Then bang.

 

Or another Gulf player.

 

etc etc.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...