Jack100 Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 I wish my daddy could get me a job like that ! 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Eric Loh Posted November 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, Jack100 said: I wish my daddy could get me a job like that ! Daddy got 2 of them jobs in the White House. His key donors got good jobs too. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted November 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Jack100 said: I wish my daddy could get me a job like that ! I wish my daddy could get me loads of trademarks very quickly (after it was decided not to pull the plug on a big chinese company) from a Chinese government that is generally very slow to grant them to non-Chinese. Like what happened with Ivanka. And I wish that if I made a terrible real estate investment that was threatening to destroy the family business someone would come along to make me a sweetheart deal that would bail me out. Like what happened with Jared. And finally, I wish that somehow Trump supporters could be made to understand that unless you can actually show that Daddy intervened on their behalf, that amounts to nothing. 3 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 4 hours ago, Sujo said: Trump will go nuts at the public hearings. Mulvaney and giuliano better watch out for that bus. Trump will be looking for scapegoats. The scapegoat option seems to be the only one Trump has not tried yet. As the other options have been a big fail so far, it's becoming more likely that he may try it. Don Giovani is the obvious one, but he is likely to have too much dirt on Trump in his files. I would bet for Mulvaney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BobBKK Posted November 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 12, 2019 23 hours ago, Eric Loh said: Hi BobBkk, the Dems we’re conducting impeachment inquiry under the rules that the Republican majority approved in 2015. Why the sad and phony whining. Hi Eric, that did not include secret hearings, coaching witnesses and ignoring Rep witnesses. Why the lack of understanding based upon bias? I expect better of you. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Bickering, baiting, off-topic posts and replies removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Actually, we know that Joseph Biden was carrying out US government policy. But what about Rick Perry? Perry backers secured lucrative Ukraine gas deal after his meeting with new president: report Two political backers of Energy Secretary Rick Perry landed a lucrative oil and gas exploration deal from Ukraine's government shortly after Perry reportedly included one of the two men in a list of suggested potential advisers to Ukraine's new president, according to The Associated Press. The AP reported Monday that Michael Bleyzer was among four names Perry had recommended to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Bleyzer and partner Alex Cranberg later got a contract to drill for oil and gas despite despite offering a bid that was lower than their only other competitor, the AP reported citing internal Ukrainian government documents. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/469858-perry-backers-got-huge-ukraine-gas-deal-after-his-meeting-with-new 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, bristolboy said: Actually, we know that Joseph Biden was carrying out US government policy. But what about Rick Perry? Perry backers secured lucrative Ukraine gas deal after his meeting with new president: report Two political backers of Energy Secretary Rick Perry landed a lucrative oil and gas exploration deal from Ukraine's government shortly after Perry reportedly included one of the two men in a list of suggested potential advisers to Ukraine's new president, according to The Associated Press. The AP reported Monday that Michael Bleyzer was among four names Perry had recommended to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Bleyzer and partner Alex Cranberg later got a contract to drill for oil and gas despite despite offering a bid that was lower than their only other competitor, the AP reported citing internal Ukrainian government documents. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/469858-perry-backers-got-huge-ukraine-gas-deal-after-his-meeting-with-new Not to mention foreign money laundering to finance election campaign by two Trump backers. Right, there is a lot to investigate about corruption in Ukraine, but not what the Reps would like to. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/10/politics/guliani-client-arrested-campaign-finance/index.html Edited November 12, 2019 by candide 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tug Posted November 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 12, 2019 Hey what’s good for the goose is good for the gander we want ivanka and jarrod To explain her trademark rights under color of working for the government with China and jarrod can explained that loan from that little Middle East country that had the blockade that suddenly got lifted 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBKK Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 Frankly I think all family members should be banned from having 'jobs' connected with their parents position no matter which party but, to me, it is a lot less egregious having a job within Daddies government (which I still don't think is right) than one with no experience, no language skills in an ex-Soviet state - doing what? just being 'Hunter'? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sujo Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 47 minutes ago, BobBKK said: Frankly I think all family members should be banned from having 'jobs' connected with their parents position no matter which party but, to me, it is a lot less egregious having a job within Daddies government (which I still don't think is right) than one with no experience, no language skills in an ex-Soviet state - doing what? just being 'Hunter'? Ukraine found nothing on him. A company can employer who it likes. But agree familly members should be banned from certain jobs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBKK Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 5 hours ago, Sujo said: Ukraine found nothing on him. A company can employer who it likes. But agree familly members should be banned from certain jobs. Yes a company can I cannot argue against that but... even Hunter admits if he were not VPs son it would not happen. What does that say? we agree - just stop it happening on any side. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, BobBKK said: Yes a company can I cannot argue against that but... even Hunter admits if he were not VPs son it would not happen. What does that say? we agree - just stop it happening on any side. I says that smart people leverage their position to legally get the best deal possible for themselves and their family. I know I do, and I would hope you do also. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catoholic Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 (edited) 14 hours ago, johnnybangkok said: And Rudy Giuliani married his cousin. His COUSIN! How sick is that. What a screwed up group of people. clearly the response of someone suffering from TDS. Divorcing your wife then marrying your dead brothers wife, right after he died no less, and there are children from both marriages is perverse. And then you're father says "we're a close family"? It's bizarre. Those are gonna be some really messed up children. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7202573/Hunter-Biden-reveals-drink-drugs-sprees-new-marriage-says-business-deals-board.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490 Edited November 13, 2019 by Catoholic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBKK Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 48 minutes ago, sirineou said: I says that smart people leverage their position to legally get the best deal possible for themselves and their family. I know I do, and I would hope you do also. Doesn't say much for humanity but I guess you have a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnybangkok Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 32 minutes ago, Catoholic said: clearly the response of someone suffering from TDS. Divorcing your wife then marrying your dead brothers wife, right after he died no less, and there are children from both marriages is perverse. And then you're father says "we're a close family"? It's bizarre. Those are gonna be some really messed up children. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7202573/Hunter-Biden-reveals-drink-drugs-sprees-new-marriage-says-business-deals-board.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490 You don't get sarcasm I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Nick Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 56 minutes ago, RideJocky said: Why would he not want to clear his name if he’s done nothing wrong That is a very good point! Talking about "clearing his name": how about Trump would release the unedited, undoctored, hidden on a secret server, transcript of the mythical phone- call! And why we are at it: his tax- returns.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsall Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 In order to get to the bottom of what happened, Hunter Biden and the whistleblower must testify in public. It's a simple request and if the Dems were playing air, it would happen. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 2 hours ago, Kelsall said: In order to get to the bottom of what happened, Hunter Biden and the whistleblower must testify in public. It's a simple request and if the Dems were playing air, it would happen. This has being explained to you several times. but actually come to think of it, I think you should testify 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroveHillWanderer Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Catoholic said: Divorcing your wife then marrying your dead brothers wife, right after he died no less, and there are children from both marriages is perverse. And then you're father says "we're a close family"? It's bizarre. Those are gonna be some really messed up children. You obviously didn't read the article you linked to. Admittedly his whole dating history still relatively perverse but he didn't start dating his brother's widow until two years after his brother died (he also didn't divorce his wife till that same year). And he didn't marry his brother's widow, they split up after two years. He then married a different woman, Melissa Cohen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sujo Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, Catoholic said: Clearly you’re not following the storyline. the bidens are corrupt. Clearly you dont know this is about what trump did. The bidens are not relevant to these hearings. What evidence could they give regarding trump bribing ukraine? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GroveHillWanderer Posted November 13, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted November 13, 2019 12 minutes ago, Catoholic said: Clearly you’re not following the storyline. the bidens are corrupt. The Bidens may be corrupt - although there doesn't seem to be evidence of anything other than some admittedly rather sleazy influence peddling, but if there were any evidence of actual wrong-doing, the correct thing to do would be to report any concerns to the FBI and/or DOJ for them to look into the matter. The absolutely wrong (and potentially impeachable) course of action is to attempt to extort a foreign leader into investigating the Bidens. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 Some troll posts and the replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now