Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, in the last 13 months I spent approx 6 in Thailand. I am 45, US citizen. I know about the squeeze that has been put on those entering frequently: it's happened to 2 of my acquaintances this year and of course I sometimes lurk on these forums.

 

I stayed 6 months with the following 30 day on arrival - 30 day extend - 30 day extend after visa run - 3 month educational visa 

 

I exited Thailand almost 6 months ago. 

 

I would like to go back for 2.5 months, with a visit to Bali in between. Arrival and departure at BKK because the prices are by far cheaper.

 

I realize it would be simpler for just 2 months (VOA+30 day extend) but who wants to go back to the cold if they don't have to? 

 

Assuming I don't have issues on initial arrival, what's best for me: 

 

Thailand 30 then Bali 30 then last 2 weeks in Thailand?

 

or

 

Thailand 30 + 30 day extend then Bali then go back to Thailand 2 days before departure?

 

Or is it too close to call? 

Posted

Your risk of denied entry is low, but real. On balance, a return to Bangkok with a confirmed flight out within two days might be the lesser risk. A rational immigration official is not going to see a planned two day stay as evidence of illegal working!

  • Like 1
Posted

As a US Citizen myself, have entered Thailand this year 8 times on visa exempts, and nothing was ever said to me. I always use the arrival service and use fast track lanes. Like some have said on here, a US passport is like a hall pass.   

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 11/11/2019 at 9:57 AM, Billpro785 said:

Like some have said on here, a US passport is like a hall pass.  

Expand  

Almost as good as one from a bit further north. 

 

You know the sticker/patch that Americans put on their backpacks when travelling abroad!

  • Like 1
Posted

Billpro, 

 

Do you fly business/First class or economy?

 

If economy, what company did you use?

 

Anyway, I'm not that worried about initial arrival, it's more the reentry from Bali or wherever I end up going.

But maybe I should be, I don't know.

 

 

Posted
  On 11/11/2019 at 9:57 AM, Billpro785 said:

As a US Citizen myself, have entered Thailand this year 8 times on visa exempts, and nothing was ever said to me. I always use the arrival service and use fast track lanes. Like some have said on here, a US passport is like a hall pass.   

Expand  

Hall Pass???? elaborate on that please as I'll arrive next week from the states as well....what maked a US passport a hall pass as you say????

Posted
  On 11/12/2019 at 4:51 AM, acenase said:

 

Not sure about that. The system automatically alerts the IO to question you after 6 Visa Exempts.

 

I almost feel like you're lying that you entered Thailand 8 times this year without anything said to you.  That's a huge red flag for officers to question you. And it's people like you who they are screening for who are coming to Thailand often with a free Visa that many times in 1 year.

Expand  

So you are saying Us folks allowed 6 exempts per calendar year???

Posted
  On 11/12/2019 at 6:37 AM, JoeSuperCool said:

"Foreigners who enter Thailand under this Tourist Visa Exemption Scheme may only do so for 30 days at one time with a maximum of 3 times in a 6-month period by flight and 2 times a year for overland crossing."

 

From the Thai Embassy London's website.

 

http://www.thaiembassy.org/london/en/services/7742/84451-Tourist-Visa.html

Expand  

This information is wrong

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 11/12/2019 at 6:37 AM, JoeSuperCool said:

"Foreigners who enter Thailand under this Tourist Visa Exemption Scheme may only do so for 30 days at one time with a maximum of 3 times in a 6-month period by flight and 2 times a year for overland crossing."

From the Thai Embassy London's website.

http://www.thaiembassy.org/london/en/services/7742/84451-Tourist-Visa.html

Expand  

The 3 months in 6 months has been out of date since 2008.

As has been said many times the 90 days in 6 months rule was rescinded in 2008.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 11/12/2019 at 6:52 AM, ubonjoe said:

The 3 months in 6 months has been out of date since 2008.

As has been said many times the 90 days in 6 months rule was rescinded in 2008.

Expand  

They're saying 3 times in 6 months not 3 months in 6 months or 90 days in 6 months.

Posted
  On 11/12/2019 at 6:51 AM, jackdd said:

This information is wrong

Expand  

So Im solid arriving next week into Bkk for 30+extend+walk across border into Burma 30+extend=120 days

 

30+30+30+30=120 then back home for a year to work-save=rinse =lather=repeat.....right?

 

Its hard to know who knows the current info etc...of course except for Ubon Joe-The Go To Guy!

Posted

So what happened was they gave me a hassle at immigration. The first agent aggressively questioned me about why did I have an educational visa, why didn't I spell the entire name of the hotel I listed as my address, he asked me how many letters in the Thai alphabet, etc.

He passed me on to a supervisor who took me aside to a table of older officers....they were more polite.

 

Bottom line, I used some Thai words I know, I cracked a few jokes, and they let me in with a warning to come with a tourist visa next time if I'm going to stay longer than a month, regardless of visa free entry plus 30 day extension and side trip to Bali or wherever.

 

 

 

Posted
  On 11/15/2019 at 4:32 PM, MrWilliams said:

So what happened was they gave me a hassle at immigration. The first agent aggressively questioned me about why did I have an educational visa, why didn't I spell the entire name of the hotel I listed as my address, he asked me how many letters in the Thai alphabet, etc.

He passed me on to a supervisor who took me aside to a table of older officers....they were more polite.

 

Bottom line, I used some Thai words I know, I cracked a few jokes, and they let me in with a warning to come with a tourist visa next time if I'm going to stay longer than a month, regardless of visa free entry plus 30 day extension and side trip to Bali or wherever.

 

 

 

Expand  

 

Curious on the age/sex of the initial officer and the older ones.

Posted

Initial officer was male, maybe 30. He passed me off to an older woman, who acted like a supervisor; she took me to a table with 2 older men, about 60 and 65 yo.

 

1 of the men did most of the talking, the slightly younger one. I cracked a joke about going to train muay Thai because I am too poom poey. At that the oldest man made a joke in Thai using the word poom poey and the whole table laughed. He seemed to have the most gravitas so I'm assuming he was the senior officer. He also never spoke once in English.

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...