Jump to content
Essential Maintenance Nov 28 :We'll need to put the forum into "Under Maintenance" mode from 9 PM to 1 AM (approx).GMT+7

Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault, rape, in turning point for #MeToo movement


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Seems the law disagrees with you.

then the law is an ass.

if he actually raped the girls ,then he deserves all he got ,but lets face it ,most just went along to get a part ,didnt want to maybe ,but nobody forced them ."its life Jim,but not as we know it"

how many of you have been with a bar girl and asked for it for free and she said no,so you gave her money,she didnt fancy you ,but did it for the money ,they did it for the part .think about it .

Edited by ivor bigun
  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Did anyone of the Harvey-bashers follow the statements of the "raped" women?

Dating Weinstein after the "rape" repeatedly? Sending him love-messages? Asking for help or a job?

Yeah, sure, it was a kind of Stockholm syndrom and the earth is flat.

The evidence presented to the court and how the jury consider that evidence is what matters.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

You think I don't know that ,just saying there are a lot of coloured people

in jail who also protest innocent.quite a few who are.he's far from it.

He must be your hero ,judging by the other post you made.

"Another travesty of justice in the land of the free." quote BritManToo

regards Worgeordie

So because I believe in Justice and rules of evidence, I'm a bad person?

The western world hates men & worships women, which is why I don't live there.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The evidence presented to the court and how the jury consider that evidence is what matters.

 

 

You're right. Miscarriage of justice never ever happens - as you can see daily in Thailand.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

You're right. Miscarriage of justice never ever happens - as you can see daily in Thailand.

Nothing at all to do with Thailand, where in any case rich men don’t get sent to prison.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, evadgib said:

@Chomper Higgot What did you find funny about #28? In similar trials elsewhere proceedings are gagged until all outstanding charges have been dealt with, so lets hear it...

 

This isn’t ‘elsewhere’.

 

It’s NY, I find it funny you din’t seem to understand that.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This isn’t ‘elsewhere’.

 

It’s NY, I find it funny you din’t seem to understand that.

So his defence team can't/won't claim that his LA trial has been prejudiced & the jury pool poisoned by media coverage?

 

Fancy that! I'm so glad you were on hand to clear that up :omfg:

Edited by evadgib
Posted
4 minutes ago, Victornoir said:

to show others that these crimes can be punished.

What crime exactly in this case? Beíng a male? Offering goodies for sex?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

They can claim whatever they wish.

The people that matter will eat that if the case collapses.

Edited by evadgib
Posted
38 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

No coercion. Just say "No, thanks".

"Rape" is something violent. Use Google.

This is the 21st century. Rape does not have to be violent. There doesn't have to be physical force; let alone physical injuries. Women (and men) can be raped through coercian in a manipulative, controlling relationship or by abuse of authority.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Did anyone of the Harvey-bashers follow the statements of the "raped" women?

Dating Weinstein after the "rape" repeatedly? Sending him love-messages? Asking for help or a job?

Which of the cases he was convicted for was that? 
 

 

 

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No I won’t.

Given the frequency by which you are wrong I prefer to wait..

+

Edited by evadgib
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, webfact said:

Weinstein never testified in his defence.

Even this rapist scumbag knew you can't defend the indefensible...

Edited by Bluespunk
punctuation
  • Thanks 2
Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

He had denied the accusations and said any sexual encounters were consensual.

This defence might have been more believable if he wasn't a fat ugly toad.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Orton Rd said:

Blokes will have to get consent forms off women now to prevent them regretting it afterwards and crying to the cops, after they cashed the cheque of course

I once attended a lecture (1974) given by a lawyer about avoiding the risk of false rape accusations in the UK.

His conclusion was to be entirely safe, you would need a signed consent form witnessed by two impartial people who could attest not only to her willing consent but her mental state and sobriety at the time.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements





×
×
  • Create New...