Yes, you’ve answered the hypothetical: you say an unbiased conviction for child rape would negatively affect your support. But that raises the question of what you would actually accept as an unbiased conviction. You've already dismissed Trump's 34 felony convictions and the Carroll verdict as kangaroo courts, citing bias and vindictive prosecution without evidence, despite repeatedly demanding evidence from others throughout this topic. You seem to think you are the sole arbiter of guilt, deciding whether a court is legitimate simply because you disagree with its ruling. But sorry, that's not how it works in a democracy. Nevertheless, what evidence would you actually accept as proof that a court proceeding was unbiased? And if I could provide you with credible evidence of child rape, would you accept it? Right. The majority of Americans didn't hire him for losing an endless war, high gas prices, record inflation, and destroying the East Wing.
