Jump to content

Trump says sending federal agents to more U.S. cities to fight violent crime


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OneMoreFarang said:

It's up to the cameraman where he points the camera at and which zoom he uses.

This is one famous example of what might be shown and what might be cut out.

Media-Manipulation-Optical-Illusion1.jpg

I'm not talking about pictures, do you understand the term 'live action'?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Tug will continue to repeat the "unmarked feds" lie long after it's been disproven.  The vehicles may be unmarked but that would be no different than unmarked police cars.

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Tug will continue to repeat the "unmarked feds" lie long after it's been disproven.  The vehicles may be unmarked but that would be no different than unmarked police cars.

Because he only watches fake news 24/7 and has no clue about reality

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Logosone said:

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

The best thing is federal charges = huge unaffordable bail and long prison sentences. SWEET

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChouDoufu said:

 

distraction?  no, not at all.  it's a strategy.

 

sending in the stormtroopers will result in increased protests, resulting in more violence, resulting in 'justification' to send in more thugs, resulting in a more excited maga base.

 

funny thing though, i spent a lotta time with patriotic, constitution-loving, right to bare arms militia types (lived in texas, new mexico, arizona, idaho).  one of their big issues (then at least) was states rights, and preppin' for when the feds send in the jackbooted thugs to steal whats left of our liberties.  must be tough for them now.  cognitive dissonance is a real bitch.

A post of absolute nonsense

They are being sent in because these terrorists are creating war zones. 

Trump is trying to help the people/families who are getting killed by these terrorists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

I'm not talking about pictures, do you understand the term 'live action'?

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

The whole world has seen the violence unleashed by the street thugs in the US. 

 

It's time the hammer came down. 

 

Hard.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

Well there are literally thousands of videos of marauding terrorists killing and maiming people, rioting, desecrating, pillaging, looting etc etc 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

 

distraction?  no, not at all.  it's a strategy.

 

sending in the stormtroopers will result in increased protests, resulting in more violence, resulting in 'justification' to send in more thugs, resulting in a more excited maga base.

 

funny thing though, i spent a lotta time with patriotic, constitution-loving, right to bare arms militia types (lived in texas, new mexico, arizona, idaho).  one of their big issues (then at least) was states rights, and preppin' for when the feds send in the jackbooted thugs to steal whats left of our liberties.  must be tough for them now.  cognitive dissonance is a real bitch.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't militia types destroying public property, is it? They have nothing to fear from this. The thugs should be scared though, and a good job too. Long overdue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

You justify the behavior of Federal Officers on the basis of the behavior of private citizens who you repeatedly refer to as criminals.

 

Let’s make a list of countries that used paramilitary forces against their own citizens and look at what it lead to.

Federal Officers did nothing wrong at all, unmarked vans. As the DHS head said, unmarked police cars are so common as to not even merit discussion. Whereas many of the protesters are indeed criminals.

 

And if ever there was a need to deploy troops to uphold US law the current time is it. 

 

Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock to uphold US law. Trump needs to do it here.

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She has a family history we could all learn from, particularly those advocating a State’s violence against its own citizens.

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Edited by Logosone
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Federal Officers did nothing wrong at all, unmarked vans. As the DHS head said, unmarked police cars are so common as to not even merit discussion. Whereas many of the protesters are indeed criminals.

 

And if ever there was a need to deploy troops to uphold US law the current time is it. 

 

Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock to uphold US law. Trump needs to do it here.

 

 

Once again, I suggest you acquaint yourself with the Constitution of the United States and the history of nations using paramilitary forces against their own citizens.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Like I say, read the history first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't militia types destroying public property, is it? They have nothing to fear from this. The thugs should be scared though, and a good job too. Long overdue.

 

it's cool when they come for "the other."

they won't come for me or mine, right?

we'll see how they feel about things later.

like maybe in november when "the other" gains the white house.

surely the new guy wouldn't try to grab muh guns!

for the children.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Apparently it's OK to be  a thug and a criminal if one is on the correct side of politics.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Acting DHS chief and former lobbyist with zero law enforcement experience Chad Wolf has exceeded by 180 days the legal amount of time anyone can serve in an Acting position without gaining Senate confirmation. Thus, any order he makes is technically illegal and he can be charged.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You justify the behavior of Federal Officers on the basis of the behavior of private citizens who you repeatedly refer to as criminals.

 

Let’s make a list of countries that used paramilitary forces against their own citizens and look at what it lead to.

New flash!!  The rioters, looters, vandals, arsonists, while being private citizens, through their own actions become criminals.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump puting federal troops in place in Democrat-run cities, more cities every month, and could use them to seize the mail-in votes at postal centers and election headquartrrs, ahem, 'to protect the integrity of the election and purge illegal votes', thereby blocking the election results for months, or even disqualifying the election itself. That would certainly allow the appointment of hundreds of additional conservative judges, likely a Supreme Court judge, and more lackeys throughout the government.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again, I suggest you acquaint yourself with the Constitution of the United States and the history of nations using paramilitary forces against their own citizens.

 

 

I suggest you acquaint yourself with the provisions of 40 U.S. Code 1315, which under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 gives the department’s secretary the power to deputize other federal agents to assist the Federal Protective Service in protecting federal property, such as the courthouse in Portland.

 

Turns out Trump has the federal law authority to send in the DHS.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/politics/federal-agents-portland-arrests.html

 

I should look at history? Sure. What do I see, oh, Eisenhower sent in federal troops to uphold the law in Little Rock.

 

Okay then. Maybe you should study some history Chomper Higgot.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...