Jump to content

Tesco Lotus ready to hire 10,000 more workers if hourly employment allowed


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, webfact said:

Tesco Lotus aims to hire another 10,000 temporary workers if the Ministry of Labour would pass an hourly employment law,

A scam for false unemployment figures the same happens in the UK zero hours contracts they call it .

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

No doubt they will be as untrained and useless as the present lot.  Numbers do not make up for poor or none existent  customer service. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, agood1963 said:

A scam for false unemployment figures the same happens in the UK zero hours contracts they call it .

Since Thailand has been reporting an unemployment rate of less than 1% for about ten years now, they hardly need any new statistical tricks to keep the figure down. As it is, anyone working one hour a week, even helping on the farm or selling something at the market or driving a motorbike taxi, is considered employed.

  • Like 2
Posted

I visit Tesco often. They have a surplus of people and don't need any more. The problem is them standing around in groups talking to each other. If you wish to buy an electrical item you have a gaggle of 'salespeople' who are totally untrained and know little to nothing about the products they sell, they are only there to show you a more expensive item. The staff stacking the shelves are among the rudest assistant I have ever seen in my life, pushing the customers out of the way en route to their 'job' and inventory control is a disaster. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, lujanit said:

This is just a ploy so CP can move all their employees in Tesco to a hourly rate thereby negating the need for holiday, sick pay etc.

 

Greed at its most blatant.  CP care nothing for their employees, all that counts is the bottom line.

Is the sale transaction to CP already completed, I thought it still had to be approved by shareholder meeting?

Posted
On 8/24/2020 at 6:16 PM, Andrew65 said:

In the UK, a zero hours contract means that one can have no work & no pay and be classified as being fully employed. Not sure what's so advantageous for the employee?

This isn't the UK so why keep going on about it?

Posted (edited)
On 8/24/2020 at 6:28 PM, BritManToo said:

If Tesco can't afford 300bht for a day's pay, they shouldn't be in business.

Tesco didn't say, or even hint, that they couldn't afford it.

Edited by Hi Tea
Posted
10 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Tesco/BigC/7-11 et al generally pay 300bht/shift.

You can argue about the length of the shift 10hrs/12hrs/14hrs, but does it really matter?

Lets be generous and call it 30bt/hr ..... but now you don't get 300bht for your shift, because they don't need to pay a full shift.

Anything over 8 hours has to be paid at penalty rates.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, lujanit said:

This is just a ploy so CP can move all their employees in Tesco to a hourly rate thereby negating the need for holiday, sick pay etc.

Greed at its most blatant.  CP care nothing for their employees, all that counts is the bottom line.

"...negating the need for holiday, sick pay etc".

How did you find out what the conditions are for hourly-rate work that has yet to be allowed by law?  Have they been published somewhere?

 

What is "blatantly greedy" about taking on 10,000 new workers and where is the indication that CP (whose purchase offer for TL has not been approved yet) care nothing about their employees?

Edited by Hi Tea
Posted
12 hours ago, pegman said:

This scam is to drop a bunch of employees from full time, with benefits, to part time without benefits.

So where is it that the new working conditions have been published for a labour category that does not yet exist under law?

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, BritManToo said:
13 hours ago, Acrylic said:

How do you know they pay 300 baht for 14 works ? Is there mention somewhere ? thank you. 

Tesco/BigC/7-11 et al generally pay 300bht/shift.

Are you claiming that Tesco Lotus, Big C and CP/7-11 all pay their employees less than the legal minimum wage?

Edited by Hi Tea
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, agood1963 said:

A scam for false unemployment figures the same happens in the UK zero hours contracts they call it .

How is that then, as it hasn't been approved but was proposed by Tesco Lotus, not the government?  How would false unemployment figures benefit Tesco, the company that is making this proposal?

Edited by Hi Tea
Posted
14 hours ago, lujanit said:

This is just a ploy so CP can move all their employees in Tesco to a hourly rate thereby negating the need for holiday, sick pay etc.

 

Greed at its most blatant.  CP care nothing for their employees, all that counts is the bottom line.

I'd go as far as saying are fair chunk of staff that work at 7-11 (CP don't own Tesco) are labour hire employee's, not direct hire, 7/11 would not be paying holiday or sick leave to them.

 

Posted

Just crossed me mind. By the time a ferangs on a pension have paid for their Hoss Box apartment in Patts they are worse off for disposable fun coin than a Thai on full time min wage.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...