Jump to content

Trump contradicts CDC director on vaccine, masks: 'He was confused'


Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, J Town said:

The five best ways to beat this thing:

 

1. Wash hands frequently

2. Wear a mask

3. Don't listen to 45

4. Avoid touching your face

4. Cough into your sleeve

 

5. Let's be careful out there.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Berkshire said:

More like brainwashed.  But once Trump is voted out-of-office in Nov, the deprogramming can begin.  Some in his cult, of course, may be beyond hope.  But a crazy old man without the power of the presidency is just a crazy old man.  It will be sad and pathetic to watch Trump post-presidency.

I am really looking forward to seeing it...., do need some good laughs 555

  • Haha 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, J Town said:

The five best ways to beat this thing:

 

1. Wash hands frequently

2. Wear a mask

3. Don't listen to 45

4. Avoid touching your face

4. Cough into your sleeve

May I add one I personally when out and about wear a mask and tight fitting sunglasses I keep hand sanitizers in my truck and disinfect towletts as well (to wipe down my keys door handles or shopping cart if going to the store)we all know what to do follow safe protocols and whatever you do don’t listen to trump!!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

My sister has one of the top jobs in the NHS and the vaccine will 100% be rolled out on the 14th October in the UK


That's a stunning claim, would be wonderful if true.

Worth noting, though, that they've been working on this for less time than Apple has been working on this year's iPhone, and even that has been delayed until later than the 14th of October.

 

Edited by Poet
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Meat Pie 47 said:

The American way

 

trump.jpg

 

More like Trump's way. His rival is routinely disparaged for acting sanely.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Poet said:


Typical. They get all the perks.

 

 

It's the same rationale as saving the best protection gear for medical staff - if they are overwhelmed, then none left to take care of the general populace. Same concept in emergency instructions while flying - put the oxygen mask first on your face, then your child's. Not the other way around.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

My sister has one of the top jobs in the NHS and the vaccine will 100% be rolled out on the 14th October in the UK

The US will obviously have a similar date too.

She is currently working on the logistics of it.

It's a massive undertaking 

 

NHS staff will get it first followed by people who are most vulnerable. 

 

Presumably you're talking about this trial vaccine in the UK:

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-vaccine-u-k-trial-restarts-but-scientists-question-lack-of-transparency/

 

Quote

 

The UK trial of a leading coronavirus vaccine, which was abruptly halted last week because of safety concerns, restarted on Saturday after the university conducting the trial said an independent committee found that it was safe to do so.

 

The University of Oxford and pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca paused enrolment in the global trials of their vaccine candidate on 6 September, after a person participating in the UK trial experienced an adverse reaction.

 

 

Not a lot of transparency occurring in the UK with the serious adverse reaction that occurred with one particular trial vaccine recipient:

 

Quote

National Institutes of Health Director Francis S. Collins testified before Congress that the illness that stopped the trial was transverse myelitis, an inflammation of the spinal cord, but the diagnosis was not confirmed by the drug company or by Oxford researchers.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/09/12/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-resumes/

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Presumably you're talking about this trial vaccine in the UK:

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-vaccine-u-k-trial-restarts-but-scientists-question-lack-of-transparency/

 

 

Not a lot of transparency occurring in the UK with the serious adverse reaction that occurred with one particular trial vaccine recipient:

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/09/12/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-resumes/

 

That patient's illness was nothing to do with the vaccination.  

The roll out is a matter of fact on the 14th October 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Poet said:


That's a stunning claim, would be wonderful if true.

Worth noting, though, that they've been working on this for less time than Apple has been working on this year's iPhone, and even that has been delayed until later than the 14th of October.

 

it's absolutely 100% fact. I've seen the documentation personally. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

That patient's illness was nothing to do with the vaccination.  

 

 

I haven't seen any impartial proof/evidence that that's actually the case....

 

"MAY NOT" be related is hardly conclusive or absolute.

 

Quote

 

(Reuters) - The adverse events that led to a pause in trials evaluating AstraZeneca Plc’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate may not have been associated with the vaccine itself, according to a document outlining participant information that was posted online by the Oxford University.

 

Enrollment in the British drugmaker’s global trials of the vaccine, which it is developing with researchers at Oxford University, was paused on Sept. 6, after a participant in its U.K. trial had a serious side effect thought to be a rare spinal inflammatory disorder called transverse myelitis.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-astrazeneca/astrazenecas-trial-illnesses-may-not-be-due-to-covid-19-shot-oxford-univ-idUSKBN2672TV

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

I haven't seen any impartial proof/evidence that that's actually the case....

 

"MAY NOT" be related is hardly conclusive or absolute.

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-astrazeneca/astrazenecas-trial-illnesses-may-not-be-due-to-covid-19-shot-oxford-univ-idUSKBN2672TV

 

They don't care, they just want it out there.  Obviously Boris wants Trump to win and it will help in the trade deal. Any side effects are meaningless to the big picture.

You heard Biden yesterday,  he knows its coming and is trying to undermine the efficacy 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, heybruce said:

Anyone more open minded and intelligent than Trump can understand that.

That don't need many brain cell!

Posted

And more re the Oxford vaccine effort... All of these biotech companies involved have significant financial stakes in their trial vaccines being ultimately allowed and used... And perhaps some of the academic researchers involved as well. So it's not entirely surprising to have them attempting to downplay potential concerns.

 

Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine:

 

Quote

“The investigators have inadvisedly been hyping their own vaccine,” Schaffner said. “The Oxford investigators were out there this summer saying, ‘We’re going to get there first.’ But this is exactly the sort of reason … Dr. [Anthony] Fauci and the rest of us have been saying, ‘You never know what will happen once you get into large-scale human trials.’”

 

https://khn.org/news/nih-and-fda-examine-serious-side-effect-that-surfaced-in-covid-vaccine-trial/

 

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

They don't care, they just want it out there.  Obviously Boris wants Trump to win and it will help in the trade deal. Any side effects are meaningless to the big picture.

 

Quote

That patient's illness was nothing to do with the vaccination.  

 

So now you appear to be pivoting away from your original claim, that the UK patient's illness had "nothing to do" with his receiving the vaccine.  A claim that, thus far, you've provided absolutely zero proof/evidence of....

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

 

So now you appear to be pivoting away from your original claim, that the UK patient's illness had "nothing to do" with his receiving the vaccine.  A claim that, thus far, you've provided absolutely zero proof/evidence of....

Nothing to see here.  Just spinal cord issues, not a big deal................................

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...