Trump says he doesn't think he's contagious, ready to campaign

[polpott]

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

This ‘Ready to Campaign’ was, we were told, to start with a rally in Florida.

 

Noise from the WH suggests that will not now take place.

 

The spin around Trump’s health and the reality of Trump’s health are beginning to collide.

 

....

 

If anyone has seen Pence, let the GOP campaign know.

Latest news I heard was that it will take place on Monday. Pure madness.

 

Its now becoming clearrer that he didn't have a test on the day of the 1st debate. What's the chances that he will turn up on Monday shedding the virus all over his supporters who, no doubt, won't be wearing masks. I suppose its one way of tipping the vote in Biden's favour.

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, polpott said:

Latest news I heard was that it will take place on Monday. Pure madness.

 

Its now becoming clearrer that he didn't have a test on the day of the 1st debate. What's the chances that he will turn up on Monday shedding the virus all over his supporters who, no doubt, won't be wearing masks. I suppose its one way of tipping the vote in Biden's favour.

As much as he needs his ‘ego stroking rally fix’, I doubt he’ll turn up.

 

 

 

 

[Hamus Yaigh]

12 hours ago, Maestro said:

Trump's medical team puzzles me. If they really wanted the best for the president, should they not have kept him in the hospital?

VIP syndrome. He's the doctors Commander In Chief. 'nuff said. You couldn't make this stuff up.

[RocketDog]

Uh oh. Run for cover! Trump is thinking again. Every time he tries this it turns into a disaster. 

 

What's a stable genius to do when everything he says or does makes him look foolish or evil? 

[RocketDog]

21 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

That fly is an American hero. I am not typically fond of flies. However, I have alot of love for that wonderful fly! 

 

And what do flies typically like to sit on? 

I assume you are referring to rotten meat? 

[Morch]

14 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

Serious indeed, an attempted coup.

Indictments over this are MUCH more likely than removing Trump using the 25th.

I would say inevitable after Trump wins.

 

Once again, what 'indictments'?

[RocketDog]

17 hours ago, polpott said:

 

I especially liked the part of the interview where he said the doctors were testing and "found very little of the virus". So they took a count of the virus particles in his blood? 

 

I'm not a stable genius so this arcane medical language just went over my head. 

[Susco]

15 hours ago, Maestro said:

Trump's medical team puzzles me. If they really wanted the best for the president, should they not have kept him in the hospital? I fear that he may have to go on a ventilator before long.

Depends on if they want to keep their job, I assume.

 

There have been plenty of cases in the past where it was revealed that his staff was forced to lie, because Trump wanted to push his me-me agenda.

 

When you see videos from Trump gasping for air, and at the same time he's claiming to be feel better than ever before, then there are no doubts that the doctors had no other choice than to let him leave and stay quiet about what is really going on.

[Maestro]

Hasn't Trump invited 2,000 followers to the White House lawn for today?

[Morch]

9 minutes ago, Maestro said:

Hasn't Trump invited 2,000 followers to the White House lawn for today?

 

Trump invites thousands to hear him speak from White House balcony on Saturday

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/09/politics/trump-covid-friday/index.html

[PattayaJames]

3 hours ago, Morch said:

 

Once again, what 'indictments'?

The wheels of justice turn slowly, isn't that what the left kept saying over the Russia Russia Russia 3 year hoax?

However, this will likely be found as not a nothing burger.

[heybruce]

5 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

The wheels of justice turn slowly, isn't that what the left kept saying over the Russia Russia Russia 3 year hoax?

However, this will likely be found as not a nothing burger.

More likely the wheels are turning slowly because there is nothing there, but Durham and Barr know that Trump will go ballistic if a report is released stating so before the election.

 

Of course Trump is outraged anyway because in his mind investigations should invent the evidence to prosecute anyone he wants prosecuted.  He was clearly counting on doing so before the election.  It won't happen.

 

"A report from the Justice Department's inspector general in December knocked down multiple lines of attack against the Russia investigation, finding that it was properly opened and that law enforcement leaders were not motivated by political bias. But Barr has said he and Durham disagreed with the inspector general over whether the FBI had enough information to open a full investigation and, in particular, to use surveillance on a former Trump campaign aide."

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-barr-odds-over-slow-214941705.html

 

Even if Barr's view on the legitimacy of the opening the Russia investigation holds up (I doubt it), it is unlikely to lead to any high-level prosecutions, and possibly no prosecutions at all.

[Morch]

3 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

The wheels of justice turn slowly, isn't that what the left kept saying over the Russia Russia Russia 3 year hoax?

However, this will likely be found as not a nothing burger.

 

So basically, you're going on (for several posts now) not about actual, real indictments, but ones which you hope might become so in the future. That you see both these imaginary indictments and their imaginary consequences as real is just another instance of Trump supporters' 'alternative facts'.

[Maestro]

5 hours ago, Morch said:

 

Trump invites thousands to hear him speak from White House balcony on Saturday

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/09/politics/trump-covid-friday/index.html

 

Thank you for the link. I am now trying to find out at what time this event will start and what news site, if any, will stream it live

[Morch]

10 minutes ago, Maestro said:

 

Thank you for the link. I am now trying to find out at what time this event will start and what news site, if any, will stream it live

 

2 p.m

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-plans-in-person-white-house-event-for-saturday-11602275494

[polpott]

1 minute ago, Morch said:

 

2 p.m

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-plans-in-person-white-house-event-for-saturday-11602275494

So 1am Thailand?

[Morch]

4 minutes ago, polpott said:

So 1am Thailand?

 

Something like that. Note I'm being deliberately evasive. Time zones are the devil's spawn.

[Maestro]

2 pm EST (Trump time), 8 pm CET (my time), Sunday 1 am ICT (Thailand)

[Maestro]

Quote

Online stream: Live on CBSN in the player above or on your mobile streaming device

Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-speech-white-house-first-event-covid-watch-live-stream-today-2020-10-10/

 

[PattayaJames]

19 hours ago, Morch said:

 

So basically, you're going on (for several posts now) not about actual, real indictments, but ones which you hope might become so in the future. That you see both these imaginary indictments and their imaginary consequences as real is just another instance of Trump supporters' 'alternative facts'.

Yes, I am voicing my opinion. Hope that is OK with you.

You are correct that there have been no indictments yet, I stated I believe there should and will be indictments.

As to ''going on about it'' I have raised the subject 1 time. You all peddled the Russia hoax 'alternative facts' non stop for 3 years. LOL

 

 

[Morch]

3 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

Yes, I am voicing my opinion. Hope that is OK with you.

You are correct that there have been no indictments yet, I stated I believe there should and will be indictments.

As to ''going on about it'' I have raised the subject 1 time. You all peddled the Russia hoax 'alternative facts' non stop for 3 years. LOL

 

 

 

As often said here, you're entitled to your own opinion, not to your facts. The facts seem to be that there are no indictments as you implied. So you were either wrong, or trying to mislead. What you believe is all very fine, but doesn't hold that much weight.

 

Again, that you claim Russian intervention in USA politics is a 'hoax' runs against the USA's own intelligence and security agencies assessments.

[heybruce]

3 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

Yes, I am voicing my opinion. Hope that is OK with you.

You are correct that there have been no indictments yet, I stated I believe there should and will be indictments.

As to ''going on about it'' I have raised the subject 1 time. You all peddled the Russia hoax 'alternative facts' non stop for 3 years. LOL

 

 

Got it.

 

The indictments are in your mouth and I won't come in the mail.

 

Why wouldn't anyone believe that?

[PattayaJames]

20 hours ago, Morch said:

As often said here, you're entitled to your own opinion, not to your facts. The facts seem to be that there are no indictments as you implied. So you were either wrong, or trying to mislead. What you believe is all very fine, but doesn't hold that much weight.

 

Again, that you claim Russian intervention in USA politics is a 'hoax' runs against the USA's own intelligence and security agencies assessments.

Please just stick to what I actually say, rather than trying to add meaning that is not there. This is one of the dishonest medias favorite tactics too. 

There are no indictments as YET, I said they are likely.

The Russian hoax that I am referring to is the  Trump collusion hoax, I am not saying that there was NO attempted interference. I hope I am spelling this out clearly enough for you now.

 

[Morch]

Just now, PattayaJames said:

Please just stick to what I actually say, rather than trying to add meaning that is not there. This is one of the dishonest medias favorite tactics too. 

There are no indictments as YET, I said they are likely.

The Russian hoax that I am referring to is the  Trump collusion hoax, I am not saying that there was NO attempted interference. I hope I am spelling this out clearly enough for you now.

 

 

It's likely that you hope indictments are likely. at most. That they are, in fact, likely is something which you, again, assume. As for your collusion nonsense - not that the Mueller investigation did not, to the best of my knowledge, deal with any 'collusion' anyway. The 'no collusion' bit was (and is) just a deflection phrase.

 

If you don't want your posts to be misinterpreted, maybe take better care when posting them. I know, not in line with Trump's example, but still. Then again, you could simply acknowledge what you actually posted in your original post -

 

Quote

...<snip>

Coming back to haunt them now, with indictments coming for the Obama administration.

...<snip>

https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1186623-trump-says-he-doesnt-think-hes-contagious-ready-to-campaign/page/5/?tab=comments#comment-15898894

 

Not stated as an opinion, no qualifications. Spin away.

[PattayaJames]

27 minutes ago, Morch said:

If you don't want your posts to be misinterpreted, maybe take better care when posting them.

 

Then again, you could simply acknowledge what you actually posted in your original post -

...<snip>

Coming back to haunt them now, with indictments coming for the Obama administration.

...<snip>

Not stated as an opinion, no qualifications. Spin away.

coming
adjective
1. due to happen or just beginning.
2. likely to be important or successful in the future.

 

Is exactly what I meant. Thanks

 

 

Edited October 12, 2020 by PattayaJames

[Opl]

A missed great Trump anthology moment..

"Donald Trump reportedly planned to emerge from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center last week by tearing open his shirt to reveal a Superman logo, a celebratory stunt he ultimately abandoned after being advised against it by aides with one eye on the mounting US death toll from the pandemic."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-news-live-twitter-biden-polls-covid-2020-election-rally-today-b984312.html 

LOL, link below

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-superman-walter-reed-discharge-plot_n_5f8248c4c5b6e5c31fff5770

Edited October 12, 2020 by Opl

[placeholder]

On 10/9/2020 at 7:27 PM, Morch said:

 

What indictments would these be?

We've been hearing from Trump supporters about imminent indictments from the Horowitz investigation, the Durham investigation, and one other that was launched between Horowits and Durham. The name of that investigator escapes me. And so far all that these investigations have produced is a guilty plea from a line lawyer about altering a small piece of text. It doesn't look like the Trump administration has time to launch another but I wouldn't put past it an attempt to do just that.

Edited October 13, 2020 by placeholder

[placeholder]

On 10/11/2020 at 3:20 PM, PattayaJames said:

Yes, I am voicing my opinion. Hope that is OK with you.

You are correct that there have been no indictments yet, I stated I believe there should and will be indictments.

As to ''going on about it'' I have raised the subject 1 time. You all peddled the Russia hoax 'alternative facts' non stop for 3 years. LOL

 

 

Another nothingburger crashes and burns

‘Unmasking’ probe commissioned by Barr concludes without charges or any public report

 

The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.

 

The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department.

 

The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html

[placeholder]

On 10/12/2020 at 7:11 PM, Opl said:

A missed great Trump anthology moment..

"Donald Trump reportedly planned to emerge from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center last week by tearing open his shirt to reveal a Superman logo, a celebratory stunt he ultimately abandoned after being advised against it by aides with one eye on the mounting US death toll from the pandemic."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-news-live-twitter-biden-polls-covid-2020-election-rally-today-b984312.html 

LOL, link below

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-superman-walter-reed-discharge-plot_n_5f8248c4c5b6e5c31fff5770

In this case, the "S" on the uniform would stand for Superspreader.

[onthedarkside]

A bickering exchange of grammar-focused posts has been removed.