Trump says he is not involved in potential prosecution of Biden's son Hunter

[Sujo]

53 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

It's Ok if English isn't your first language.

Covfefe. Thighland. Yo semite. Biggest and most words.

 

Ring a bell?

[EVENKEEL]

3 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Covfefe. Thighland. Yo semite. Biggest and most words.

 

Ring a bell?

I see <deleted> is still running rampant. 

[Tie Dye Samurai]

8 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I see <deleted> is still running rampant. 

You are right, Covid is still running rampant in the USA...great job by Dear President getting that under control from the Golf Course....just swell

[Srikcir]

Trump just can't get any satisfaction that his election loss isn't being helped by the AG.

Since before election day the Deleware federal prosecutors, IRS and the FBI have been investigating Hunter's tax affairs. Likely directed by AG Barr at Trump's "suggestion." But obviously it will continue beyond Biden's Jan. 20 inauguration and of no immediate political value to Trump.

Now Trump is considering to fire Deputy AG Rosen who hasn't promised an immediate "investigation" and prosecution according to White house sources contacted by CNN. Problem for Trump is he has no authority to assign a Special Counsel and (I believe) a temporary appointment by Trump as AG who is not confirmed by the Senate has no authority to do so either. 

Trump is not a winner but rather a whiner.

[herfiehandbag]

5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

AFAIK, none of Trump's kids have been crack addicts, impregnated a stripper, or slept with their brother's widow.  That's about the only "business" that Hunter excels at.

 

But, and this is a big but, the Trump kids were all involved in their family's PRIVATE business, not merely riding their father's name and public service. 

A quite remarkable catelogue of allegations - albeit for the most part not illegal.

 

Now, are their facts to back them up, or is it merely a question of passing the Rudi Giulliani evidential test - "everyone knows that..."

[EVENKEEL]

47 minutes ago, Tie Dye Samurai said:

You are right, Covid is still running rampant in the USA...great job by Dear President getting that under control from the Golf Course....just swell

Wrong, funny how a non foul word is deleted. But it wasn't Covid, ahahaa

[vandeventer]

Why go after the addict when you can get the supplier?

[Scott]

Troll post reported and removed.

 

[Sujo]

1 hour ago, vandeventer said:

Why go after the addict when you can get the supplier?

Addict of what? You do note the word ‘was’, do you the same problem with english?

 

Funny how people chase hunter who holds no office but nooo, not dodgy donald who actually is is in trouble with tax fraud and actually is president.

 

but not for long.

Edited December 18, 2020 by Sujo

[herwin1234]

Trump who? He's old news..

[Jingthing]

8 minutes ago, herwin1234 said:

Trump who? He's old news..

Please make that so ASAP!

 

Opinion | Can you feel your blood pressure going down? Thank Joe Biden. - The Washington Post

Quote

 

Can you feel your blood pressure going down? Thank Joe Biden.

 

You know what's truly remarkable and promising about the incoming Biden-Harris administration? It's so normal.

 

 

[ChouDoufu]

9 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

AFAIK, none of Trump's kids have been crack addicts, impregnated a stripper, or slept with their brother's widow.  That's about the only "business" that Hunter excels at.

 

But, and this is a big but, the Trump kids were all involved in their family's PRIVATE business, not merely riding their father's name and public service. 

 

maybe hunter's an old testament guy.  deuteronomy offers interesting life lessons.

brothers wives, prostitutes, getting stoned......it's all in there.

[J Town]

45 denied it bigly, strongly, so it must be true.

[Jeffr2]

12 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

I see <deleted> is still running rampant. 

I see <Trump> is still running rampant.

 

Yup.  Got that one for sure.

[2BOB]

If Democrats have nothing hide then they should not bloke any inquire .

 

[Eric Loh]

9 minutes ago, 2BOB said:

If Democrats have nothing hide then they should not bloke any inquire .

 

The fact of the matter is really those GOP blokes have no evidence. That WH bloke just happy to string along his gullible supporters to keep his cash hoard healthy for his personal spending. 

[Sujo]

32 minutes ago, 2BOB said:

If Democrats have nothing hide then they should not bloke any inquire .

 

Who is blocking it?

 

As opposed to repubs blocking witnesses in the trump impeachment.

[Jeffr2]

51 minutes ago, 2BOB said:

If Democrats have nothing hide then they should not bloke any inquire .

 

True!  So why did the Republicans obstruct justice in the Mueller investigation?  Or any of the other investigations surrounding Trump and his minions?

 

I'll await your answer...

[Jeffr2]

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Not any inquiry. But in a case where the courts have repeatedly ruled there is a profound lack of evidence and there is a superabundance of falsehoods, why waste time and resources?

Because this is what his followers want to see.  Anything derogatory against AOC, Hillary, Obama, Hunter...likes moths to a light.

[TopDeadSenter]

24 minutes ago, placeholder said:

But in a case where the courts have repeatedly ruled there is a profound lack of evidence and there is a superabundance of falsehoods

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

[placeholder]

8 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

Actually, I can't. I misposted. This comment was meant for another thread.

[Jeffr2]

23 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/23/us/politics/biden-inquiry-republicans-johnson.html

Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden

 

The report delivered on Wednesday appeared to be little more than a rehashing of unproven allegations that echoed a Russian disinformation campaign.

 

An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, closing out an inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish the Democratic presidential nominee.

[Jeffr2]

26 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

You need to read this.  It will help.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/28/hunter-biden-senate-report/

The report presents no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden, and omits testimony that exculpates him

[Phoenix Rising]

41 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

How can there be any court rulings as there's no case?

[Sujo]

1 hour ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Can you give a list of these court rulings concerning Hunter Biden and his recent legal woes that state there is a "profound lack of evidence" and a "superabundance of falsehoods" as you claim? I do not remember any court rulings on the matter.

How can there be court rulings for something that doesnt exist.

 

The simple fact there isnt any is proof there is nothing, or do you think trump aaked the AG not to prosecute him.

 

Where is trump anyway, hiding in the basement? Anyone seen him? Except for the golf starter.

[Jeffr2]

1 minute ago, Sujo said:

How can there be court rulings for something that doesnt exist.

 

The simple fact there isnt any is proof there is nothing, or do you think trump aaked the AG not to prosecute him.

 

Where is trump anyway, hiding in the basement? Anyone seen him? Except for the golf starter.

3,600 people died yesterday, Russia hacked many government servers, and Trump's MIA.  Or, on the golf course.

 

For most of us, that's what we expected.  When will his supporters wise up?  Right....