.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Latest posts...
-
9
Why so many conspiracy theorists and what to do about them
You got this perfectly backwards. The so-called conspiracy theories are on the rise because people are able to communicate more freely now and don't rely solely on centralized media as their main source of truth. -
4
Thai-Scottish Ranger Resigns After Incident with Racist Tourists
Overreaction? Am I a racist if a say "Hello, or Guten Morgen or Buenos dias, ot Good morning...knowing that they are all from Limerick? I think this guy got a lot of personal undisclosed problems 😳 -
4
Trump Warns of US Withdrawal from Ukraine Peace Efforts Amid Stalled Negotiations
Understandable. He probably has another game of golf to attend this weekend. -
8
Bangkok Governor Apologises as Rescue Efforts Fall Short in Building Collapse
Not an easy task. They are doing a great job. -
41
Stop Calling It Autism. Start Calling It Vaccine-Induced Encephalopathy
Well, there certainly is 'low-grade DNA' (although that's not a medical term of course). Just look at the result of inbreeding within the Royal families of Europe over the past few hundred years. Intellectually-inadequate (slow-brained). As for the huge levels of inbreeding within Pakistani communities, don't get me started on that one. Thousands of years before doctors even knew about DNA, they knew that it was not a good idea to marry your cousin and have offspring etc. They also knew that the same principle could be applied to other animal and plant species. (This is why Nature created some flowers only to have male or only female parts, so that pollinators were forced to pollinate with pollen from other plants, and not flowers on the same plant). As humans, it seems that we are fine to 'cull' the weak plants and crops, striving through genetic modification to produce healthy and strong crops with 'good DNA', but we don't apply that to the human species. Of course, this is the principle of Eugenics, and discussion of it is tainted by its links to the Nazis. Darwin postulated about the Survival of the Fittest, which is Nature's way of ensuring strong and healthy species. But apparently it doesn't apply for humans because we actively go against that idea. Surely (IMHO) the end-game is decimation of our species. Humans also encourage 'bad DNA' by breeding pets, such as pug dogs, boxer dogs and the like which accentuate bad DNA, with such animals plagued by medical problems solely caused by our desire to breed IN bad DNA, not breed it OUT. I'm looking at all this from a purely scientific viewpoint - there are of course ethical considerations. But none of the above addresses the OP topic - what causes autism? The idea that vaccinations cause autism has been proven (see other posts) to be total <deleted>. Of course, there are some who have adverse (and sometimes very severe) reactions to vaccinations, but the % is miniscule. Whereas the OP rightly points out the growing % of those with autism. I have an open mind about the causes of autism, and it's good to continue this thread discussion 🙂 -
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts