Jump to content

THAI Responds to Alleged Dismissal of 400 Pilots


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

I do think the acquisition of new aircraft isn’t all that bad of an idea.

 

In the short term it’s going to drive down their line maintenance costs markedly 

 

For example, I recall their 772’s are ready for fleet removal and that will help as that fleet type is now around the 14 year mark with some of their oldest 772 being acquired in late ‘06

 

Overall their net fleet age isn’t too bad, but that’s largely driven by their A388’s and 787’s... so... to me, if they replaced their older 772s that would help tremendously with not only line maintenance costs, but also boot network reliability... and of course have a huge impact on driving down CASM (Cost per Available Seat Mile).

 

So... while i agree the optics of adding fleet now seems perhaps odd or unwise, i also recognize that given the overall interest rate environment is at very very low levels, this actually might be a good time to borrow for fleet renewal projects....: and by moving to a more fuel efficient fleet should help drive down operational costs on a post-restructuring basis.

 

Edited by new2here
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is that they have no business plan that does not rely heavily on foreign tourism. They will stall as long as they can delaying their foreign creditors until mass tourism is revived. 

 

Expect their foreign creditors to be trying to get money from THAI for a decade or longer. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Fex Bluse said:

The reality is that they have no business plan that does not rely heavily on foreign tourism. They will stall as long as they can delaying their foreign creditors until mass tourism is revived. 

 

Expect their foreign creditors to be trying to get money from THAI for a decade or longer. 

Indeed and just watch as TG routes are decided upon where the creditors are located and which country will be willing to seize their planes rather than profitability.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

I must confess that I was not aware that they came separately - perhaps the investment could be spread by buying the aircraft first and the engines later

 

I didn't realise that either, at least until I read an article in the UK media over the weekend regarding the woes of the Rolls Royce aircraft engine division, and how many staff they are laying off.
The article mentioned that the engines are actually leased to airlines on a by use basis, with so many aircraft not operatings, along with their engines, Rolls Royce are no longer receiving an income for the use of their engines.
I'm sure this is an oversimplifiction of the process, but it's certainly a difficult time for the whole industry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

 

Gentlemen, it is manifestly obvious that you have very little knowledge of how such aviation business is conducted in the kingdom.  Firstly, the procurement of 10 new aircraft and their engines (I must confess that I was not aware that they came separately - perhaps the investment could be spread by buying the aircraft first and the engines later - it is not as if they are going to be flying anywhere for some time) will be funded by borrowing from the government - as they are no longer the majority shareholders it will be a "commercial decision" with conventional formal and informal aspects to the disbursement of funds. 

 

Secondly such a process will result in a significant stimulus to the business of a variety of associated undertakings, ranging from specialist stationery suppliers to Mercedes Benz dealerships. At these times of economic sluggishness such a stimulus will be welcome.

 

Thirdly, any aircrew redundancies are the sad but inevitable result of the redundees limitations as donut chefs! These are hard times, and there are tough decisions to be made.

I doubt that they will buy, in all probability they will try to lease, as they do with the engines, that are paid 'power by the hour'.  Thai must be the only international airline that has not already laid off pilots, cabin and ground staff.  They should and must do that. The interesting issue is if they don't pay off their existing debts, neither Boeing nor Airbus will lease them new aircraft and the independent aircraft  leasing companies will add a massive premium to their costs if they have a bad credit rating.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, colinneil said:

So Thai airways think that spending billions on 10 new planes is going to solve their problems, crazy or what.

They have planes parked up that they cannot sell, so lets buy more, unbloody believable.

 

The planes that are parked are obsolete. Why would you expect TG to keep flying  B747 and AB 340 when other airlines were phasing them out years ago because the aircraft consumed too much fuel? The B777 aircraft TG  is trying to dispose of are  20+years old and require some heavy maintenance.  The new aircraft pay for themselves in their fuel savings and additional payloads and range.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fex Bluse said:

The reality is that they have no business plan that does not rely heavily on foreign tourism. They will stall as long as they can delaying their foreign creditors until mass tourism is revived. 

 

Expect their foreign creditors to be trying to get money from THAI for a decade or longer. 

The reality is that they have no business plan that does not rely heavily on foreign tourism. They will stall as long as they can delaying their foreign creditors until mass tourism is revived."

 

Well there is an answer > no tourists therefore revenues down > easy answer > raise fares.   

Edited by scorecard
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, colinneil said:

So Thai airways think that spending billions on 10 new planes is going to solve their problems, crazy or what.

They have planes parked up that they cannot sell, so lets buy more, unbloody believable.

Some of those planes can hardly be given away for scrap value. (A340) Buying 10 but how many of their old gas guzzlers will be parked, permanently? Major restructuring is happening worldwide covid-19 the biggest thing to happen to air travel since the introduction of jet engines. A Japanese sent me a link claiming ANA and JL might merge. Asiana and Korean already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scorecard said:

The reality is that they have no business plan that does not rely heavily on foreign tourism. They will stall as long as they can delaying their foreign creditors until mass tourism is revived."

 

Well there is an answer > no tourists therefore revenues down > easy answer > raise fares.   

I will not be surprised if they do that. Thai Logic ????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simplifying  the lineup is the correct reaction, unfortunately they go for Boeing instead of Airbus. Mainly because the military part (and former military pilots) prefer Boeing. Also the consultant has American roots. Some bus drivers will go to THAI smile. Although the A 350 will stay according to some sources.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must admit that unlike most of the slaggers on here I have had  literally thousands of wonderful flights with Thai.

One very quickly forgets the advantages & flag waving a national carrier gives a small

country like Thailand & the difficulties faced if you do not have.

The restructuring had to be done & if 400 pilots will not be needed , so be it.

The mainstay aircraft for International travel has been the 747 & 777, (not 772) the former of which has just about been put out to pasture & the 777-200's if not, should be soon.

They have both been wonderful aircraft & served well

The next 6 years sees  the A350 & 767 being masters of the skies due to their range , fuel economy & size. (not too big)

Even Emirites has realized this & wants to change their orders from the new 777X {due to be released in 2022 ) to the 767's

Thai has the A350 (not sure how many) flying now & is living up to it's billing .

Cracker of an aircraft to me.

The restructuring is ongoing & if going to continue the airline must plan 

I am astounded that their creditors did not insist on a highly skilled "expat" to oversee the restructuring & is disappointing if for no other reason than to  be seen to "keep the  cookies in the cupboard"

Finally, if they insist on ALL Government Departments being billed & pay in 30 days for any staff flights taken  they can make a go of it. NO Freebies except for normal FF's

I for one hope so because "I fly Thai" whenever it suits where I am going

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine was a maintenance manager for a large airline operating out of Suvarnabhum. He always said that one day he'd buy an engine then he'd be on easy street and he thought he had one coming out of Indonesia as there was a P+W refurbishment shop down there that he thought he could purchase one from, not cheap i might add..... 

I asked him to elaborate ? He told me that most airlines rent the engines, rent the seats, and finance the airframe. 

Wow, that was a revelation to me, but as far as Thai airlines goes, no one's going to touch them if they can't pay their debts first, and we all know that Thais don't like to pay back. I learned that from my first job in Thailand when i had to go to a company, threaten to smash the gates down, then confiscated a lot of machinery from the company that initially started the Skytrain in payment for what they owed the company i was working for. It was hilarious as i'd turned up with a D9 on a flatbed and just pointed to the Dozer when the bloke on the gate was refusing entry...... He flung the gates open and being an elderly German man was heard muttering......"Tommies"

 So Thai airways predicament doesn't look all that bad if they just opened the country up as soon as possible and got the tourist figures to a level where you could entice finance....... Flog the scrappers to Bolivia or someone who wants to make a restaurant and stop running the joint like an army camp......

 

Oh, and run the airline for profit not a private taxi service for the connected....... 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...