Dumped British TV host Morgan pours more scorn on Meghan suicide, racism claims

[Sujo]

48 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

More garbage writing.

"Looks on" means he is watching something happen.

Yes, he is watching things as he takes his daughter to school.

[elliss]

22 hours ago, Jimbo53 said:

No chance,take a look at what people in the UK say about it,it would'nt surprise me if the pair of them never set foot in the UK again,because of the feeling of resentment against them by the British public after their media sensationalised 'allegations' regarding the Royal Family.

 

     Fyi . Many people in the UK . 

Are not of British origin , yet they can vote on ,

  British destiny or destruction . 

Democracy ? , gone wrong ..

Come back , Enoch Powell .. Asap ..

[elliss]

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

Yes, he is watching things as he takes his daughter to school.

Good riddance , to a chancer .. 

    RIP .  Asap ..

[elliss]

3 hours ago, KarenBravo said:

A third rate actress that just had to play the race card.

Easy to see who wears the trousers in their relationship.

 Me thinks , he follows his Dad .. 

  Runs in the Famiily ..

   Land of hope , those were the days ...555

[mogandave]

3 hours ago, Sujo said:

It was changed from global warming to climate change because people had the wrong interpretation of what global warming meant.

Why cant the rich fly private and yet ask that the companies that build the planes make them more climate friendly.

Whats wrong with living in a large home and asking those that build such homes to make them more climate friendly.

Hilarious. 

If they really gave a flip they’d quit buying huge home and private jets until they were made environmentally friendly. What do you think would be more effective at getting manufacturers to change:

1. Appearing  on TV going on about how “woke” they are because they advocate the poor conserve energy.

2. Appearing on TV going on about how “woke” they are because they scrapped their jet and and are flying coach. 

Like all leftists, they’ll continue living any way they please and blaming others for all the worlds problems. 

[KarenBravo]

34 minutes ago, elliss said:

 Me thinks , he follows his Dad .. 

  Runs in the Famiily ..

   Land of hope , those were the days ...555

Almost like Edward VIII and Wallace Simpson.

[Jimbo53]

48 minutes ago, elliss said:

 

     Fyi . Many people in the UK . 

Are not of British origin , yet they can vote on ,

  British destiny or destruction . 

Democracy ? , gone wrong ..

Come back , Enoch Powell .. Asap ..

Dont try and lecture me about UK Demographics,i live there.

[Sujo]

12 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Hilarious. 

If they really gave a flip they’d quit buying huge home and private jets until they were made environmentally friendly. What do you think would be more effective at getting manufacturers to change:

1. Appearing  on TV going on about how “woke” they are because they advocate the poor conserve energy.

2. Appearing on TV going on about how “woke” they are because they scrapped their jet and and are flying coach. 

Like all leftists, they’ll continue living any way they please and blaming others for all the worlds problems. 

So what are you saying. Rich people cannot be asking companies try to find more environmentally acceptable ways to live? Thats funny.

[Sujo]

4 hours ago, KarenBravo said:

A third rate actress that just had to play the race card.

Easy to see who wears the trousers in their relationship.

So those against her either say she is a third rate actress or that she is is an actress. She cant win.

how about she made a complaint, her husband head it.

so how about not focus on her but focus on the complaints of her husband.

Edited March 16, 2021 by Sujo

[bkkcanuck8]

13 minutes ago, KarenBravo said:

Almost like Edward VIII and Wallace Simpson.

No not like Edward... Edward was a traitor King (the divorcee was a convenient excuse to pack him off to some far flung post).... He was also a Nazi sympathizer (hmmm there is that racist Royals thing again - I doubt he was the first or the last)....    If you wonder where the tapes that leaked from the Tampon Charlie affair -- it is because they were under surveillance -- maybe because of the issue that originated with the Traitor King (who was also put under surveillance - my suspicion is that it has been in place since then).    Today's issue with the Royals pales in comparison.

[mogandave]

58 minutes ago, Sujo said:

So what are you saying. Rich people cannot be asking companies try to find more environmentally acceptable ways to live? Thats funny.

No, what I’m saying is that they're hypocrites. 

The best way to convince companies to provide new products it to quit buying the old ones. Rich leftists don’t want to do that, they want to go on TV and act “woke” by by beating up on their suppliers, and then it’s a wink-wink-nudge-nudge let’s upgrade to the G700...

[Scott]

Troll post reported and removed.  

 

[Sujo]

14 hours ago, mogandave said:

No, what I’m saying is that they're hypocrites. 

The best way to convince companies to provide new products it to quit buying the old ones. Rich leftists don’t want to do that, they want to go on TV and act “woke” by by beating up on their suppliers, and then it’s a wink-wink-nudge-nudge let’s upgrade to the G700...

And yet its working. Companies are putting more funds into alternatives.

[mogandave]

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

And yet its working. Companies are putting more funds into alternatives.

Yes, but there is already viable alternative, fly commercial. 

That companies are putting more funds into alternatives, just drives the cost up, which of course the rich leftists applaud, because they’re rich and they don’t really care what it costs the poor. 

in any event, regardless of how energy efficient a jet, a home or anything becomes, private is going to use more.

[Sujo]

10 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Yes, but there is already viable alternative, fly commercial. 

That companies are putting more funds into alternatives, just drives the cost up, which of course the rich leftists applaud, because they’re rich and they don’t really care what it costs the poor. 

in any event, regardless of how energy efficient a jet, a home or anything becomes, private is going to use more.

I certainly wouldnt want to be on any transport with him.

I know my hybrid merc costs very little to run and about a third of yearly reg costs compared to a non hybrid. 

Havent you noticed flight costs have great bargains. Cheaper than they were years ago, not counting pandemic times.

[2530Ubon]

On 3/12/2021 at 10:16 PM, billd766 said:

 

But you can buy white, brown and black bread in the UK shops, or have the wokes stopped that as well.

Woke is broke.

[elliss]

23 hours ago, KarenBravo said:

Almost like Edward VIII and Wallace Simpson.

 Royal  DNA .

    Edward V111 .  We are indeed blessed . 

    Gave Catholic rule in the UK , the big ...

    Church of England ,  Westminster Abbey , the Tower ,, etc ..

   

 

  

[elliss]

23 hours ago, mogandave said:

 

Like all leftists, they’ll continue living any way they please and blaming others for all the worlds problems. 

 

   Tony Benn , comes to mind .

     Socialist ? .  my A.....

[Surelynot]

On 3/16/2021 at 2:25 PM, mogandave said:

No, what I’m saying is that they're hypocrites. 

The best way to convince companies to provide new products it to quit buying the old ones. Rich leftists don’t want to do that, they want to go on TV and act “woke” by by beating up on their suppliers, and then it’s a wink-wink-nudge-nudge let’s upgrade to the G700...

Do you read what you type before posting?

[mogandave]

6 hours ago, Surelynot said:

Do you read what you type before posting?

What part is not clear to you?

[Sujo]

4 minutes ago, mogandave said:

What part is not clear to you?

Probably the bit where you say they should stop buying the old ones, then say stop upgrading to the new one.

[bkkcanuck8]

*Deleted post edited out*

 

What passport did she say they confiscated?  I vaguely recollect an old regulation with diplomats (probably voided in Canada in the last decade; but the UK may still have that requirement) that they had to turn in their other passports (normal ones) when they received the diplomatic passport - and return the diplomatic one when using the normal one (now they let you carry both).  As a Royal they may not allow you to use the normal passport at all... (i.e. you cannot travel except as a diplomat - even for vacations). 

[mogandave]

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

Probably the bit where you say they should stop buying the old ones, then say stop upgrading to the new one.

Yes, clearly you did not understand. 

[Sujo]

21 hours ago, mogandave said:

Yes, clearly you did not understand. 

It was not me who posted about it. Another poster did. And yes, you did an oxymoron.

[Sujo]

22 hours ago, bkkcanuck8 said:

*Deleted post edited out*

 

What passport did she say they confiscated?  I vaguely recollect an old regulation with diplomats (probably voided in Canada in the last decade; but the UK may still have that requirement) that they had to turn in their other passports (normal ones) when they received the diplomatic passport - and return the diplomatic one when using the normal one (now they let you carry both).  As a Royal they may not allow you to use the normal passport at all... (i.e. you cannot travel except as a diplomat - even for vacations). 

I highly doubt that they would hold her passport to stop her travelling. Thats too far fetched.

[Sujo]

To be honest it would be interesting.

Part black woman and a ginger daywalker.

A black ginger in the royal family.

[bkkcanuck8]

2 hours ago, Sujo said:

I highly doubt that they would hold her passport to stop her travelling. Thats too far fetched.

I did not say hold her passport to stop her traveling, but potentially holding her passport as part of passport regulations that apply to everyone.  There have been regulations (in the past in Canada) that indicate you may only hold one passport at a time (with the exception of allowing for two for the case where you cannot use the same passport because of international reality [i.e. If you use your passport to enter Israel you will be refused entry to quite a number of Islamic countries]).  This regulation limited the holder to hold either a diplomatic passport or a normal passport but not both at the same time (this though can be a pain since there are different visa requirements and requirements for entry - even for personal travel where you are not covered by diplomatic immunity i.e. normal passport you can enter on a visa waiver, but sometimes the same country will require a visa if it is a diplomatic passport). 

For someone unfamiliar with all the ins and outs of all sorts of different regulations - and being hyper sensitive to being treated differently because of race (which unfortunately is still an issue) - it could easily be misinterpreted when viewed through this lens.

Another possibility...

When she became a Royal, I expect that because of that relationship to the head of state should would be covered by diplomatic immunity since she could be used as leverage against the head of state (i.e. arrested for trumped up charges to exert influence on the Royal family).  As such she might not be allowed to travel on a normal passport at that time.

When you deal with people, memory is not linear...  and if you query even two completely honest people you are likely to get differing stories over time (police view two people with exactly the same story as suspicious because they assume they have been coached to have the same story)... So assuming incorrect recollection or recollection through ones own bias as automatically a lie if it does not match what you believe to is the truth... if you have two people you almost end up with two versions of the same event that do not match and the truth may not match up to either.

Edited March 19, 2021 by bkkcanuck8

[bendejo]

On 3/16/2021 at 6:22 AM, Sujo said:

So those against her either say she is a third rate actress or that she is is an actress. She cant win.

how about she made a complaint, her husband head it.

so how about not focus on her but focus on the complaints of her husband.

How about we just ignore this whole thing?  I don't follow this stuff, have no interest in it, but it jumps out of the news pages, the talk-show comedians can't let go of it, and before I watched the first few seasons of The Crown I never got their names straight (and now that they are in Charles and Diana times I've lost interest).  IMO the episode about the banishment of Edward VIII was probably the best one, but maybe I liked it because I knew nothing about it before.  (And I do miss the 'hot' Margaret actress from the first seasons.)

Maybe it's all different for those who grew up with a smartphone in their hand, a generation obsessed with taking pics of themselves and trying to garner the attention of people they'll never know, and families that live to be on TV shows.  And then there's the previous generation of media exhibitionists, like the lady who interviewed them who just can't get enough attention.

 

Edited March 20, 2021 by bendejo

[GrandPapillon]

Anyone interested in British royalty needs to watch the superb TV show, The Crown. Quite fascinating, and apparently everything is true and "as is" according to a few Palace insiders. Of course, some dramatization in the TV show from what actually happened, and yet this is an eye opener to what is the most interesting Royal family.

[2530Ubon]

8 hours ago, GrandPapillon said:

Anyone interested in British royalty needs to watch the superb TV show, The Crown. Quite fascinating, and apparently everything is true and "as is" according to a few Palace insiders. Of course, some dramatization in the TV show from what actually happened, and yet this is an eye opener to what is the most interesting Royal family.

NO NO NO. It's fiction BASED on real people and events.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-55207871

 

Quote

 

Netflix says it will not warn viewers of The Crown some scenes are fiction.

Responding to calls for a warning from Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden, the streaming giant said the series has always been billed as a drama.

"As a result we have no plans, and see no need, to add a disclaimer," it said.

Mr Dowden earlier said younger viewers "may mistake fiction for fact" when watching the fourth series, which shows the breakdown of the marriage between the Prince and Princess of Wales.

The Crown's creator Peter Morgan has called the show "an act of creative imagination" with a "constant push-pull" between research and drama.

Its latest series has attracted criticism from some quarters for its depiction of royal events - in particular the breakdown of the marriage of Prince Charles and Diana.

The culture secretary said last week Netflix should make clear the show was fiction.

 

In other news; John Oliver is doing a Megan and Harry analysis on his show 'Last week tonight'. It'll be interesting to see which way he goes on this as he's usually liberal, but fair.