Jump to content

All eyes on China’s Sinovac – Thailand’s vaccine choice for emergency


webfact

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Kiujunn said:

Show me publications of Sinovacs side effects,  please.

Especially publications as thorough as the ones for side effects of mRNA vaccines,  AZ, J&J.

I will read them with great interest. 

In most of the English speaking world and Europe, the Chinese vaccines aren't being used. So naturally there will be less written about it. On the other hand, the most prominent fact repeatedly cited in headlines is that Coronavac only has an efficay of 50.4 percent. That figure is repeatedly cited here by vaccine bashers. Where do you think they got that from from? Reading medical journas? And has repeatedly been pointed by epidemiologists and public health community, that is a very poor criterion by which to judge the usefulness of a vaccine.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

In most of the English speaking world and Europe, the Chinese vaccines aren't being used. So naturally there will be less written about it.

?????

Other languages can be written, too. Maybe not by you.

Even Chinese can be written,  in case you didn't know.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

50.4 percent. That figure is repeatedly cited here by vaccine bashers. Where do you think they got that from from? Reading medical journas? And has repeatedly been pointed by epidemiologists and public health community, that is a very poor criterion by which to judge the usefulness of a vaccine.

That's correct. 

Butantã has said that, too (those 50.4% came from Brazil).

Edited by Kiujunn
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kiujunn said:

Are you kidding? That's the phase 1/2 study. 

I want studies of rare side effects in the millions who received Sinovac in real life, just like we have these studies for the Western vaccines.

Have you stopped to consider there may not be any rare side effects of note, therefore no side effects to study or publish. I'm pretty sure if people are dropping dead, results will be published, the same as any other vaccine.

I am still very confident that health departments all over the world are monitoring "all" vaccines equally for side effects, not sure why they would leave sinovac off the list.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

Have you stopped to consider there may not be any rare side effects of note, therefore no side effects to study or publish. I'm pretty sure if people are dropping dead, results will be published, the same as any other vaccine.

I am still very confident that health departments all over the world are monitoring "all" vaccines equally for side effects, not sure why they would leave sinovac off the list.

I have considered that there may be no rare side effects at all. I even opened a thread with this title. 

It is hard to believe. Every vaccine (not only covid vaccines) tends to have some side effects.

6 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

health departments all over the world are monitoring "all" vaccines equally

No.

Western health department do not and cannot monitor Sinovac(it is not used in the West).

And China is smart enough to sell the stuff only to countries they can buy off should the need arise.

 

  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kiujunn said:

?????

Other languages can be written, too. Maybe not by you.

Even Chinese can be written,  in case you didn't know.

I used google translate to turn the following phrase into portuguese: brazil sinovac coronavac side effects

 I googled the translation. efeitos colaterais do brasil sinovac coronavac

You might want to try that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kiujunn said:

I have considered that there may be no rare side effects at all. I even opened a thread with this title. 

It is hard to believe. Every vaccine (not only covid vaccines) tends to have some side effects.

No.

Western health department do not and cannot monitor Sinovac(it is not used in the West).

And China is smart enough to sell the stuff only to countries they can buy off should the need arise.

 

Seriously ??? Its a Chinese communist conspiracy.  We are going to need a bigger tin foil hat.

 

So if I have the phizer vac tomorrow and drop dead, that will be noted, studied, published etc. But i I have the sinovac vac tomorrow and drop dead, it wont be noted, studied, published, because China will pay the Thai government.

 

Maybe two hats are required.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

And that's the key ???? Before a couple companies hit it out of the park with mRNA vaccines, anything 50% plus effective was (and still is?) the US FDA's standard for approval for a Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine. 

 

You can take it. I'll pass.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I used google translate to turn the following phrase into portuguese: brazil sinovac coronavac side effects

 I googled the translation. efeitos colaterais do brasil sinovac coronavac

You might want to try that.

I did that long ago. No need for google, I used to live in Brazil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

I have the sinovac vac tomorrow and drop dead, it wont be noted, studied, published,

Thai social media are full of stories like that.  I doubt them very much. 

But they are ridiculed,  written off as fake news or hysterical reactions of stupid Thai girls...I would rather see serious studies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chine had only one option and yet they are doing pretty darn good now. 50% is better than zero and i don't think any other vaccine except Sputnik V will be available in large quantities this year, So stop talking about it, roll the sleeves and get vaccination rolling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MasterBaker said:

Chine had only one option and yet they are doing pretty darn good now. 50% is better than zero and i don't think any other vaccine except Sputnik V will be available in large quantities this year, So stop talking about it, roll the sleeves and get vaccination rolling

Sputnik has run into serious production problems.

Big promises, few doses: why Russia's struggling to make Sputnik V doses

Transforming the site of what once was a Soviet-era car factory into a state-of-the-art facility churning out Russia's COVID-19 vaccine Sputnik V was the easy bit.

Making doses in bulk, finding qualified staff and getting equipment have been much bigger headaches for Moscow-based biotech firm R-Pharm and other private Russian companies picked to make the country's flagship shot to fight the pandemic.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/big-promises-few-doses-why-russias-struggling-make-sputnik-v-doses-2021-05-14/

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MasterBaker said:

Chine had only one option and yet they are doing pretty darn good now. 50% is better than zero and i don't think any other vaccine except Sputnik V will be available in large quantities this year, So stop talking about it, roll the sleeves and get vaccination rolling

Sputnik works in the same way as AstraZeneca or Johnson&Johnson, except it is far more effective as it is using different vector for second shot than the first, unlike AZ which uses 2 identical shots. But their problem rises from inability to monitor progress and only be able to compare results once vaccine is "fully baked". If it matches expected sample, it's a pass, else they need to toss it. That was the official response on why their output is far lower than expected. I was also surprised o see how long it takes them to produce a batch...  Removing the rest as @placeholder above just pasted the link I was quoting.

Edited by tomazbodner
Removed last chapter - previous poster had identical link and information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, clivebaxter said:

Don't be too unkind, the Chinese did make a very good virus 

Silly, if China made the virus don't you think they would have made a treatment or vaccine before they released the virus on their public?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DavisH said:

The often quoted 50% is for those with mild infections - which you could just recover from at home. It is more effective against serious infections, and should heelp you out of the crematorium. This is the way most vaccines work. 

What we don't know for sinovac is how long the antibody titre stays high, and when another booster shot may be needed. 

First I heard of increased effectiveness against serious infection. Do you have a source for that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mavideol said:

why take it if only 50% effective, currently anybody with good immune system  has 50/50 %  (or more) chances of getting infected if getting the Chinese vax still have the same 50/50 % chances, why get it

50% effective cuts risk of symptomatic disease in half compared to a non-vaccinated person.

 

Do you think that half the vaccinated people in clinical trials had symptomatic disease?

Do you think that half the placebo group people in clinical trials had symptomatic disease?

In both cases the number of people with symptomatic disease was far smaller than that.

The efficiency and efficacy numbers compare the ratio of the number of sentinel events in vaccinated vs. placebo groups.

 

I know: effective is real world vs. efficacy is clinical trials but the misunderstanding of the nature of the percentages quoted is the same.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jimbone said:

First I heard of increased effectiveness against serious infection. Do you have a source for that?

 

That has been reported for every vaccine as far as I know.

Highly effective against hospitalization and death.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/22/health/covid-vaccines-prevent-death/index.html

"All the Covid-19 vaccines prevent death and severe disease, and that's what matters, experts say"

 

Been reported 10 different times, 10 different ways.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

So why the comment about lack of stories about side effects? To those of whom it would be a concern there seem to be plenty.

Stories, there are plenty. 

Serious studies,  hard to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, webfact said:

50.4% effective at preventing symptomatic infections overall. However, it was 78 per cent effective in preventing mild to serious cases that need hospitalisation.

 

So kind of like not having a vaccination at all ???? - the problem is that it seems other countries dont  accept you as vaccinated if you have the Sino saline.  So it may make travel difficult.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...