Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Hummin said:


How many nuclear weapons does Russia have?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60564123

 

Nuclear weapons pose the single biggest threat to the Earth's environment, scientists have warned.

In a new study of the potential global impacts of nuclear blasts, an American team found even a small-scale war would quickly devastate the world's climate and ecosystems, causing damage that would last for more than a decade.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2006/dec/12/nuclearindustry.climatechange

Ok, you are right. Those bombs can kill us all. Let’s then make Mr Putin with his unpredictable ‘interests’ - the ruler of the world. After all - we have no choice. He has the bombs!

 

 

Edited by Hellfire
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, tgw said:

Logic subroutine error : 404 logic not found

 

but anyway: everyone calls Putin a war criminal. Except Belarus, North Korea and China...

 

it's happening now. just watch.

I'll take that bet.

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

 

I'm saying that Stalin's actions in 1932 solidified Ukrainian hatred of Russia and make a mockery of your claim that Ukraine remains within Russia's "sphere of influence".

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Germany has determined to remove it's influence on Russian oil within 5 years. Nobody said immediate. It will nevertheless cripple Russia's economy.

Until the time comes for war reparations,  sanctions will need to be removed in order to pay for war reparations

A number of countries are just waiting for Iran sanctions to be lifted in order to discuss Oil and Gas imports

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, vinny41 said:

Until the time comes for war reparations,  sanctions will need to be removed in order to pay for war reparations

A number of countries are just waiting for Iran sanctions to be lifted in order to discuss Oil and Gas imports

War reparations?  From the Russians?  You do have a vivid imagination.  Who is going to occupy the Russian Federation and force them to pay reparations?

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, cmarshall said:

Oil is fungible.  Someone will always buy Russian oil like the Indians are doing now.  The US despite its efforts was never able to shutdown Iran's oil exports.

[India] needs European capital, Japanese investment and U.S. technology to modernize its economy--not to mention weapons and diplomatic support in order to stand up to rival China. Its media and ruling establishment should also remember that Russia caused this crisis with an unprovoked invasion of a smaller neighbor--and India can hardly be on the side of the aggressor.

 

https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hurting-from-sanctions-on-russia-india-is-losing-faith-in-the-west-122031800125_1.html

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

Until the time comes for war reparations,  sanctions will need to be removed in order to pay for war reparations

A number of countries are just waiting for Iran sanctions to be lifted in order to discuss Oil and Gas imports

Nah, there's a better way to do it.

 

 

Much of Russia’s $630bn of foreign exchange reserves are thought to be held outside the country, and effectively frozen by sanctions in the US, the EU and other places.

That would make billions available for reconstruction – if Ukraine is able to access it once the war is over.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-60684660

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hellfire said:

Ok, you are right. Those bombs can kill us all. Let’s then make Mr Putin with his unpredictable ‘interests’ - the ruler of the world. After all - we have no choice. He has the bombs!

 

 

The question is if Russia was an superpower?

 

Their economic is on par with ranked between South Korea and Spain on 12. Place.

 

Military power they rank from 2. To nr 6 depending on which source you choose.

 

And seeing them in action now in Ukraine, you know it is more about moral to fight than real power. Unless Putin send away a few nuclear warheads and also choose to use chlorine gas. 

 

What then? 

Posted
1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

[India] needs European capital, Japanese investment and U.S. technology to modernize its economy--not to mention weapons and diplomatic support in order to stand up to rival China. Its media and ruling establishment should also remember that Russia caused this crisis with an unprovoked invasion of a smaller neighbor--and India can hardly be on the side of the aggressor.

 

https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hurting-from-sanctions-on-russia-india-is-losing-faith-in-the-west-122031800125_1.html

Which is why the Indians are buying Russian oil now then?  

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

 

Don't fool yourself into think the Russians are winning.

 

The column gets stopped and an impatient general goes forward to see what's going on, because there's no initiative, no non-commissioned officer corps, no sense of initiative at junior levels -- they wait to be told what to do. Gets up there, and the Ukrainians have very, very good snipers and have been picking them off."

"At least four of the five have been confirmed, I think the fifth we'll hear about today," he added.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/russia-ukraine-generals/

  • Haha 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, tgw said:

Afghanistan and Vietnam would like a word...

 

Russia were in Afghanistan around 9 years and had around 14.5k combat troop deaths as a result. They've been in Ukraine just over 3 weeks and already had around that amount.

 

Kind of puts Russia's losses in perspective

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

 

Somehow, I think it is you who is influenced by the Hollywood cold war era propaganda about the mighty Soviet war machine. You don’t seem to understand the real situation with the Russian military of 2022: backward, corrupted and low motivated.  Many more surprises on the way for you.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Germany has determined to remove it's influence on Russian oil within 5 years. Nobody said immediate. It will nevertheless cripple Russia's economy.

I don't think Germany has any "influence" on Russian oil, but instead heavy reliance on it and as well Russian gas (50% from Ru) and the only way to drop their dependence now and long term is to use less /cut consumption, and use more coal. Russia appears to have high demand for their energy and no shortage of energy customers if you bothered to check and now you can add China to the list.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/exclusive-russia-china-agree-30-year-gas-deal-using-new-pipeline-source-2022-02-04/

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/26/business/china-russia-ukraine.html

Edited by wofat
  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, cmarshall said:

The Russian Federation has neither the economic nor the military might to match Stalin's in 1945.  Putin knows this.  

 

But frankly I don't worry about the Russians attacking yet another country.  The rogue nation much more likely to do so is the US, cf. Panama, Grenada, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq (twice), and with eyes on Iran.  

More whataboutary 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wofat said:

I don't think Germany has any "influence" on Russian oil, but instead heavy reliance on it and as well Russian gas (50% from Ru) and the only way to drop their dependence now and long term is to use less /cut consumption, and use more coal. Russia appears to have high demand for their energy and no shortage of energy customers if you bothered to check and now you can add China to the list.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/exclusive-russia-china-agree-30-year-gas-deal-using-new-pipeline-source-2022-02-04/

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/26/business/china-russia-ukraine.html

sorry, I meant "dependence".

Posted
2 hours ago, cmarshall said:

There may indeed be downsides for Russia, but nothing that is going to prevent them from achieving their goal of destroying Ukraine.   

There was also nothing to prevent the Soviet Union from destroying Afghanistan.  Instead Afghanistan destroyed, or at least contributed mightly to the destruction of, the Soviet Union.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Actually the US has been trying for better relations with Russia since the Bush administration.  It only seemed to make Putin bolder.

 

Regarding separating Russia from China; that won't happen until it suits China.  They are both autocratic nations that want an empire.

 

"Asked to describe China’s strategic goal, diplomats at more than a dozen embassies in Beijing are in near unanimity. They say China wants a world order built around spheres of influence, with China in control of Asia, Russia wielding a veto over security arrangements in Europe and America pushed back to its own shores. If such an order is helped into existence by Russia’s war in Ukraine, so be it."   https://www.economist.com/china/chinas-friendship-with-russia-has-boundaries-despite-what-their-leaders-say/21808197

 

However China correctly sees Russia as the minor partner in an duopoly that controls the Eurasian continent, and an expendable one at that.  If supporting Russia becomes inconvenient China will dump Russia.

China doesn’t produce enough food to feed itself, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine threatens grain supplies.

 

The US is a food exporter and China a dependent importer of US foods.

 

Russia is expendable.

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Another flame post toward a fellow forum member has been removed.

 

My patience for removing such flaming comments is getting very thin. If I continue to see such personal, belittling comments toward other members, patience is going to turn to posting suspensions!

 

You've been warned...

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...