Jump to content

Condo Owner Fined Over 140,000 Baht For Keeping A Pet In The Unit


webfact
 Share

Recommended Posts

From the article "all kinds of animals, such as those that create a nuisance and frighten people"

So, how about geckos?

The article doesn't mention what pet the person had, or their nationality. This is strange.

And as for having to "pay a fine of 141,500 baht to the juristic person", well does that me the juristic person gets to do what he/she likes with all that cash? Seems like a job I'd like to apply for.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Some arsehat in our building is dumping their dogs <deleted> in the enclosed poolside rain gutters at floor level. 

 

If we (the other residents) catch them, we'll rub their nose in it!

 

PSA: Please don't do this to an actual puppy -adult human trash only!😁

Edited by chalawaan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

"According to Rule 1, item 9.2 it is forbidden to keep all kinds of animals, such as those that create a nuisance and frighten people,  in the condominium or the condominium area."

 

Why not just state cats or dogs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

"According to Rule 1, item 9.2 it is forbidden to keep all kinds of animals, such as those that create a nuisance and frighten people,  in the condominium or the condominium area."

 

Why not just state cats or dogs?

Thai people keep all types of animals as pets: eg. rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, rats, mice... the list goes on. "animals" will cover most of them with the exception of insects and other invertibrates.

Edited by JensenZ
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webfact said:

GOING viral on Thai social media today (August 14) is a condo owner being ordered by court to pay a fine of 141,500 baht to the juristic person for keeping a pet in the unit in violation of the regulations

Condo owner must love the pet... 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Orinoco said:

Surprised he never got 10 years in jail  as well.

OTT out of touch justice system of Thailand.

or maybe a little share out of the booty latter.

 

Civil case, not criminal, it's you who's out of touch with the different justice systems.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 2long said:

From the article "all kinds of animals, such as those that create a nuisance and frighten people"

So, how about geckos?

"all kinds of animals".

A gecko's an animal, isn't it, so yes...

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 2long said:

And as for having to "pay a fine of 141,500 baht to the juristic person", well does that me the juristic person gets to do what he/she likes with all that cash?

Yes, within the bounds of the job, of course it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, newnative said:

Well done, JP.   But, at the same time, I'm thinking of those poor fire victims getting far less.  

So far.  Only initial compensation has been paid at this stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, swm59nj said:

I’m not saying condo rules should be broken without consequences.  But that is a hefty total fine.  The owner must be a foreigner 

Is a foreigner (if it was one) exempt from condo rules?

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...