Jump to content

The CDC is tracking a new variant of concern dubbed XBB.1.5


Social Media

Recommended Posts

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday it is tracking a new variant of concern dubbed XBB.1.5. According to new figures published Friday, it estimates XBB.1.5 makes up 40.5% of new infections across the country. 

XBB.1.5's ascent is overtaking other Omicron variant cousins BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, which had dominated a wave of infections over the fall. Scientists believe its recent growth could be driven by key mutations on top of what was already one of the more immune evasive strains of Omicron to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omicron offshoot XBB.1.5 could drive new Covid-19 surge in US

 

For weeks, scientists have been watching a slew of Omicron descendants duke it out for dominance of Covid-19 transmission in the United States, with the BQs – BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 – seeming to edge out all the others to claim a slight lead.

The result has been a gradual rise in cases and hospitalizations that never seemed to reach the peaks of this summer’s BA.5 wave and was certainly nothing like the tsunami of illness caused by the original Omicron strain a year ago.

But on Friday, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Covid-19 variant dashboard revealed a new dark horse that could soon sweep the field: XBB.1.5.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/03/health/covid-variant-xbb-explainer/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

On what grounds do you base the claim that it is not sound research?

"This article is a pre-print and has not been peer reviewed. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and should not be used to guide clinical practice".

 

"You really have two choices. Reject any and all research because it doesn't say exactly what you want it to, or examine it on its merits and maybe even learn something".

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post with a link to an unapproved source has been removed as well as the replies.  As stated in the link when opened:

 

This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

"Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 now accounts for 73% of all sequenced COVID-19 cases in NYC. XBB.1.5 is the most transmissible form of COVID-19 that we know of to date and may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/health/omicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

Vaccine's are not working with new variants and may be detrimental to those already vaccinated. What's going on with the vaccines now, putting people at risk for getting infected by a virus that the vaccine should prevent. Time to rethink the net benefit or lack thereof with mRNA injections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dotcalm said:

 

"Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 now accounts for 73% of all sequenced COVID-19 cases in NYC. XBB.1.5 is the most transmissible form of COVID-19 that we know of to date and may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/health/omicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

Vaccine's are not working with new variants and may be detrimental to those already vaccinated. What's going on with the vaccines now, putting people at risk for getting infected by a virus that the vaccine should prevent. Time to rethink the net benefit or lack thereof with mRNA injections.

Your statement:  "Vaccine's are not working with new variants and may be detrimental to those already vaccinated" is false, nor does your lead quotation suggest it. Please see my post to you in the other thread here.

 

Unless you have some scientific proof, you might consider a retraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dotcalm said:

 

"Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 now accounts for 73% of all sequenced COVID-19 cases in NYC. XBB.1.5 is the most transmissible form of COVID-19 that we know of to date and may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated or already had COVID-19."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/health/omicron-subvariant-xbb-1-5-possibly-more-likely-infect-vaccinated-officials-say

 

Vaccine's are not working with new variants and may be detrimental to those already vaccinated. What's going on with the vaccines now, putting people at risk for getting infected by a virus that the vaccine should prevent. Time to rethink the net benefit or lack thereof with mRNA injections.

Did you even read your own link?

 

"The department added that getting vaccinated against the virus, including receiving an updated booster shot, remains the best way to protect against hospitalization and death, including from new variants."

 

Why make this false claim?

6 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Vaccine's are not working with new variants and may be detrimental to those already vaccinated. What's going on with the vaccines now, putting people at risk for getting infected by a virus that the vaccine should prevent. Time to rethink the net benefit or lack thereof with mRNA injections.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...