Jump to content

Netanyahu says don’t get ‘hung up’ on peace with Palestinians first


webfact

Recommended Posts

image.jpeg
Netanyahu on peace process: 'We're going to have to live together'. Source: CNN

 

By Tara John and Rob Picheta, CNN

 

CNN — Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said people can get “hung up” on peace negotiations with the Palestinians, saying he has opted for a different approach in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Tuesday.

 

“When effectively the Arab-Israeli conflict (comes) to an end, I think we’ll circle back to the Palestinians and get a workable peace with the Palestinians,” he said.

 

Asked by Tapper about the Biden administration’s concerns that settlements in the occupied West Bank could exacerbate tensions, Netanyahu pointed to the success of the Trump-era Abraham Accords that normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries.

 

Full story: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/31/middleeast/benjamin-netanyahu-cnn-interview-israel-intl/index.html

 

image.jpeg

-- © Copyright CNN 2023-02-01
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Jews are indigenous people in Israel.

Big difference to SA.

 

https://m.jpost.com/opinion/article-728602

 

Even the PLO knows the Jews are indigenous to Israel - Opinion

 

The Jewish people originated in and are indigenous to what is now the modern state of Israel.  Jews are from Judea.

And very few remained for about 1500 years. The notion that the rights people whose ancestors emigrated 75 generations or so ago takes precedence over those who were living there already is nuts. If someone was born there and was living there they have at least as much right as do settlers. More really.  Israel wasn't established because of some long felt connection to Judea. In fact, the Orthodox were very much opposed to resettling Israel, It was secularized Jews, especially socialists, who pushed for resettlement in Israel due to their persecution in Europe. And, of course, the resettlement was based on this lie: 

"In 1914 Chaim Weizmann, later president of the World Zionist Congress and the first president of the state of Israel said: "In its initial stage Zionism was conceived by its pioneers as a movement wholly depending on mechanical factors: there is a country which happens to be called Palestine, a country without a people, and, on the other hand, there exists the Jewish people, and it has no country. What else is necessary, then, than to fit the gem into the ring, to unite this people with this country?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_land_without_a_people_for_a_people_without_a_land

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Jews are a people. 

Jewish is a religion. 

Israel is both the ancient and modern homeland of the Jewish people.

Of course the origins if Zionism are political.

Look at the history of Jews in the diaspora.

Of course Arabs in the region deserve rights but in the context of acceptance the reality that Jews in Isreal aren't going anywhere.

About half of Jewish Israelis believe in separate and unequal when it comes to rights for Arab citizens of Israel. And 80% of Jewish Israelis believe that fateful decisions about Israel should be made by a majority of Jewish Israels.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-01-15/ty-article/.premium/about-half-of-israelis-believe-jews-should-have-more-rights-than-arabs-study-shows/00000185-b5ea-d11e-a1cd-b7ead62e0000

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

About half of Jewish Israelis believe in separate and unequal when it comes to rights for Arab citizens of Israel. And 80% of Jewish Israelis believe that fateful decisions about Israel should be made by a majority of Jewish Israels.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-01-15/ty-article/.premium/about-half-of-israelis-believe-jews-should-have-more-rights-than-arabs-study-shows/00000185-b5ea-d11e-a1cd-b7ead62e0000

 

I don’t understand the point you are trying to make.

We all know Israeli politics is dominated by the right wing there.

 

Personally I'm American and have always hoped for a two state solution. But frankly I don’t think either side wants that now.

Edited by Jingthing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The Jews living on the land were actually killed , rather than they emigrated .

  Rome killed about 1 million Jews on the land and nearly wiped Jews out  .

  Jews lost power in the land 2000 years and only regained power in 1948

Can you enlighten us as to where present day Jews come from then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I don’t understand the point you are trying to make.

We all know Israeli politics is dominated by the right wing there.

And what is the trend in Israel? Are Jewish Israelis growing more moderate or more extreme? According to the article, there was a big jump in the numbers supporting special rights for Israeli Jews. 

And in 2011, Israel approved laws that in effect allowed new communities to exclude Arabs from living there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, placeholder said:

And what is the trend in Israel? Are Jewish Israelis growing more moderate or more extreme? According to the article, there was a big jump in the numbers supporting special rights for Israeli Jews. 

And in 2011, Israel approved laws that in effect allowed new communities to exclude Arabs from living there.

Do you really have to ask that question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

OK, so Israeli Settlers who were born on the land have as much right to live there as Palestinians do ?

Sure, But if the land was expropriated without compensation, as was mostly the case, they should have no right to live on that land.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Do you really have to ask that question?

Is this your way of not answering that Israel has grown increasingly worse in its treatment of Arab citizens? This is what separate and unequal inevitably leads to.

Edited by placeholder
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, placeholder said:

Sure, But if the land was expropriated without compensation, as was mostly the case, they should have no right to live on that land.

West bank settlements are one thing but Palestinian activists continue to chant river to the sea.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jingthing said:

West bank settlements are one thing but Palestinian activists continue to chant river to the sea.

And Native Americans murdered European settlers and their descendants. This kind of thing is inevitable when you treat one group of people badly. Starting in 1967 the Israelis tried their best to make the Palestinians miserable. And I wasn't just referring to land on the West Bank. Israelis confiscated territory where Arabs lived inside of Israel.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

And Native Americans murdered European settlers and their descendants. This kind of thing is inevitable when you treat one group of people badly. Starting in 1967 the Israelis tried their best to make the Palestinians miserable. And I wasn't just referring to land on the West Bank. Israelis confiscated territory where Arabs lived inside of Israel.

You're all over the place now. I can't have a coherent discussion on such terms.

The odd thing is we probably largely agree about how bad Israeli governments have been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:
Amnesty report

The report states that, taken together, Israeli practices, including land expropriation, unlawful killings, forced displacement, restrictions on movement, and denial of citizenship rights amount to the crime of apartheid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_apartheid#

Amnesty International's reputation for political neutrality has plummeted in recent decades (imo). Your quotation (from Wiki, a useful source when dealing with actual facts, but hopelessly biased when offering opinion) could apply to scores of modern states (including the United States and its historical dealings with indigenous people!)

 

The fact remains that Israel is the ONLY country in the whole of the Middle East that has free and fair elections.  You may not like the results, but their brand of democracy has guaranteed a vitality to all sectors of society.

It is an insult to our intelligence to equate Israel with the former S Africa, where Israeli-type democracy was only a distant dream for 90% of the population.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Arabs are not allowed to live where they want to. Israel refuses to give them land to accommodate their growing communities. 

That's way to general an assertion. Arab Israeli citizens are diverse and they generally do not want to leave Israel.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...