Jump to content

DOJ no longer believes Trump should have immunity from E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuit


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

The Justice Department has reversed course and said it no longer believes that Donald Trump should be entitled to immunity for his response to E. Jean Carroll’s accusation of sexual assault, allowing the civil lawsuit to move forward to trial in January.

The change in position eliminates one legal hurdle surrounding Carroll’s 2019 defamation lawsuit against Trump for statements he made while president, denying her allegation of rape decades earlier, that he didn’t know her, and that she wasn’t his “type.”

DOJ lawyers said in a letter to lawyers for Trump and Carroll that “the Department has determined that it lacks adequate evidence” to conclude the former president was acting within the scope of his employment or serving the US government “when he denied sexually assaulting Ms. Carroll and made the other statements regarding Ms. Carroll that she has challenged in this action.”

 

FULL STORY

image.png

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

 

She is a has been.  A popular journalist in her young days that has in recent years become an overt feminist with failed literary productions, multiple failed relationships and multiple sexual assault claims that took place in closets, elevators and dressing rooms.  Trump is not the only one that she has threatened for financial gain.

Previous history shows that she has lived a fanatic life of feminism.  

 

In 2002, Carroll co-founded greatboyfriends.com with her sister, Cande Carroll. On the site, women recommended their ex-boyfriends to each other.  In 2004, she launched Catch27.com.  On the site, people put their profiles on trading cards and bought, sold, and traded each other.

 

Trump may not be an alter boy, but still deserves proof and not peer pressure opinion to be convicted by a manipulated jury.  I.E. criminal vs civil court case. “Proof with no doubt, or conceptual  with no proof.

  • Confused 1
Posted

A post violating fair use policy has been removed along with reply:

 

27. You will not post any copyrighted material except as fair use laws apply (as in the case of news articles). Only post a link, the headline and three sentences from the article. Content in the public domain is limited to the same restrictions.

Posted
On 7/12/2023 at 8:11 AM, Tug said:

Ha ha guess you can’t get away with grabbing the lady’s by the privates after all lol ???? perhaps Jean Carroll can get a conviction on the rape charge after all!

The case in this topic so called Carroll i is for defamation only.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

From the above:

 

Separate from his motion for a new trial, Trump is also contesting the verdict before a federal appeals court. That appeal remains pending.

Meanwhile the verdict stands.

Posted
10 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

From the above:

 

Separate from his motion for a new trial, Trump is also contesting the verdict before a federal appeals court. That appeal remains pending.

I think a pac is paying for his legal costs, correct? And while this is happening the donations keep coming in.

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Meanwhile the verdict stands.


CASHIERS OFFICE CRIS DEPOSIT as per 210 Stipulation and Order, dated 06/23/2023, from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, $5,550,000.00 deposited on 6/28/2023, Receipt Number NYSCCA23-00337 and placed into CRIS as of 6/29/2023.

 

 During the Appeal, the Clerk of this Court will redeposit the sum received from Defendant in an interest-bearing account, and the interest generated by the deposit will be added to the original deposit and serve as additional security for Plaintiff; 

 

 If the Judgment is reversed and set aside completely, then the sums originally deposited with the Court by Defendant, together with any interest earned on such funds less any fees, shall be paid to Defendant. Collection by Defendant of the funds held by the Court may be accomplished by means of a motion or a stipulation and order, with notice served on the Clerk of this Court; 

Edited by jerrymahoney

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...