Swing States: harris is terrified , she’s loosing many in the old demographic

[bubblegum]

We talked about WRLive change of policy I got this answer from them:

Patrick 



 



Aan:U

CC:Contact WRLIFE

Di 2024-10-22 18:15

 

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract MDI963187 is from 2022.

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

2 hours ago, bubblegum said:

We talked about WRLive change of policy I got this answer from them:

Patrick 



 



Aan:U

CC:Contact WRLIFE

Di 2024-10-22 18:15

 

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract MDI963187 is from 2022.

 

Well, that certainly clears things up, doesn't it?

[jerrymahoney]

6 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

9 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract nnnnn is from 2022.

 

Well, that certainly clears things up, doesn't it?

Maybe overly cryptic but sounds like he's saying the new degenerative illnesses policy is not retroactive to existing policies.

 

But no worries --  you and your compatriot may still have "the proof to go after the individual behind the company."

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Maybe overly cryptic but sounds like he's saying the new degenerative illnesses policy is not retroactive to existing policies.

 

But no worries --  you and your compatriot may still have "the proof to go after the individual behind the company."

 

Perhaps policies that were issued more recently already contain the restrictive wording, but older policies don't and the new wording only applies to them. But difficult to tell based upon this. 

 

I think it was fairly clear from the broker's statement in the OP that the changes were being implemented with respect to existing policies. In fact, the broker stated that WRLife originally wanted to impose them mid-term instead of at renewal.

[jerrymahoney]

As of now I don't know for sure -- the policy doc when my policy was issued does not contain the word "degenerative".

But this topic gave you another chance to list Shrdlu's greatest hits as to what an insurance company SHOULD do but this one doesn't.

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them. Edited 1 hour ago by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

20 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As of now I don't know for sure -- the policy doc when my policy was issued does not contain the word "degenerative".

But this topic gave you another chance to list Shrdlu's greatest hits as to what an insurance company SHOULD do but this one doesn't.

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them.

 

I think those comparisons are perfectly valid.

 

Who is the underwriter of your policy?  Ask the company then you tell us who it is, if you can.

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by JBChiangRai

[Celsius]

Yall must be reading different trust pilot reviews

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, Celsius said:

Yall must be reading different trust pilot reviews

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

 

Meaning?

[jerrymahoney]

14 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

34 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them.

 

I think those comparisons are perfectly valid.

7. You will not post defamatory or libelous comments. Defamation is the issuance of a statement about another person or business which causes that person or business to suffer harm or loss. A statement does not have to be false to be defamatory

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

7. You will not post defamatory or libelous comments. Defamation is the issuance of a statement about another person or business which causes that person or business to suffer harm or loss. A statement does not have to be false to be defamatory

 

Someone reported one of my posts, and the report was denied.

 

Stop deflecting and answer the question, Who is the underwriter of your policy?

 

It doesn't make sense for you to take out a policy without checking out the underwriter is able to meet it's obligations.

[jerrymahoney]

I'll answer what I want to answer and leave the critiques to others

At least so far for me it has made a lot of sense.

You are presuming there is one underwriter consistent for the entire policy term. I don't make that assumption.

Edited 1 hour ago by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

I'll answer what I want to answer and leave the critiques to others. At least so far for me it has made a lot of sense.

 

And I accept it has made sense to you.

[jerrymahoney]

17 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

That last statement you posted if accurate is exactly the kind of thing that would give you the proof to go after the individual behind the company.

So why don;'t you just go after the guy and leave me and others on here out of it.

[JBChiangRai]

6 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

So why don;'t you just go after the guy and leave me and others on here out of it.

 

I don't have a horse in this race.

 

I just want people to make an educated decision before spending their money.

[jerrymahoney]

11 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

I don't have a horse in this race.

 

I just want people to make an educated decision before spending their money.

BS you're in full time attack mode as indicated by your chosen vocabulary

Edited 35 minutes ago by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

3 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

BS you're in full time attack mode

 

You're entitled to your opinion, and I get how you want it to be all good.

 

My concern is how will they handle a large claim, heart attack, kidney transplant etc, the most important thing is to understand the underwriter.  I'm sure you understand the underwriter fully as you're a shareholder in it, your policy document says so, check your share certificate.

 

Every document they have is gobbledygook