6 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Fox has mischaracterised the issue, by the House rules video records are not required when 'written transcripts of them were provided'.

 

Fox said in defence of one of their many court cases for lying, that a reasonable person of ordinary intelligence would not conclude Fox News as fact.

What does that say about you?

Fact check (usatoday.com)

The Jan 6 select for TV production committee based their criminal referrals on the video and documented witness testimony and SC Jack Smith used the Jan 6 evidence as the predicate in the charging indictment against Trump and now this video evidence is suddenly "unavailable", "missing" as claimed by the committee chairman? LOL, maybe now the Trump's Jan 6 case joins Biden's polling numbers in the toilet soon w/o the Jan 6 evidence which at this point is all hearsay without corroboration. The bigger question is why are the video archives being withheld from congress investigators now? The stench of another democrat tactical strategy including CYA, coverup, obfuscate, lie, cheat, stonewall etc as they subvert justice. 

 

What this says about you is you know not what you are talking about and need to get up earlier in the morning if you want to have a hope of keeping up, right now you are slipping, falling way behind dude. Try becoming more informed instead of being and looking more foolish.

2 minutes ago, illisdean said:

The Jan 6 select for TV production committee based their criminal referrals on the video and documented witness testimony and SC Jack Smith used the Jan 6 evidence as the predicate in the charging indictment against Trump and now this video evidence is suddenly "unavailable", "missing" as claimed by the committee chairman? LOL, maybe now the Trump's Jan 6 case joins Biden's polling numbers in the toilet soon w/o the Jan 6 evidence which at this point is all hearsay without corroboration. The bigger question is why is the video archives being withheld from congress investigators now? 

 

What this says about you is you know not what you are talking about and need to get up earlier in the morning if you want to have a hope of keeping up, right now you are slipping, falling way behind dude. Try becoming more informed instead of being and looking foolish.

Thank you for your reply.

I have already disproved your OP, QED.

Regurgitating the same garbage, adds little to the conversation.

My only suggestion is that 'if you want to have a hope of keeping up', add some logical evidence based on facts (for which will need a link from a credible source).  

1 hour ago, illisdean said:

The Jan 6 select for TV production committee based their criminal referrals on the video and documented witness testimony and SC Jack Smith used the Jan 6 evidence as the predicate in the charging indictment against Trump and now this video evidence is suddenly "unavailable", "missing" as claimed by the committee chairman? LOL, maybe now the Trump's Jan 6 case joins Biden's polling numbers in the toilet soon w/o the Jan 6 evidence which at this point is all hearsay without corroboration. The bigger question is why are the video archives being withheld from congress investigators now? The stench of another democrat tactical strategy including CYA, coverup, obfuscate, lie, cheat, stonewall etc as they subvert justice. 

 

What this says about you is you know not what you are talking about and need to get up earlier in the morning if you want to have a hope of keeping up, right now you are slipping, falling way behind dude. Try becoming more informed instead of being and looking more foolish.

The testimonies have been transcribed and checked by the witnesses themselves. As usual, you have nothing!