Jump to content

US and UK hint at military action after largest Houthi attack in Red Sea


CharlieH

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

The U.S. has stepped up its efforts to halt revenues supporting the Houthi attacks by issuing new sanctions, some with connections to Iran. And as far as the mullahs go, they know a direct confrontation with the U.S. would be a disaster for Iran.

So it is in their best interests to stop the attacks on shipping.  If Iran refuses to replenish the Houthi arsenal then it will be just a matter of time before they run out of steam.

China, in the meantime, is does not want to see a full-on regional conflict since it will certainly curtail their oil imports from the Middle East.  The Chinese are already having a hard time meeting electrical power needs and are turning more and more to coal.

As for issuing new sanctions, are there any serious ones left for the US to invoke? After the previous administration not only pulled out of the nuclear agreement with Iran, but made it virtually impossible for any business interests in the West to legitimately do business with Iran, they pretty much removed all incentives for Iran to cooperate with the west. And once the agreement fell apart, it vitiated the status of the moderates in the Iranian government who had staked their hopes and reputations on the agreement.

As for China, it's not so much about imports as it is about exports. China's economy is hugely reliant on exports to the west. Its economy is already in big trouble. A crimp in its exports would be especially damaging now.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

US fighter aircraft shot down an anti-ship cruise missile fired at a Navy destroyer in the Red Sea from a Houthi-controlled area of Yemen on Sunday. No injuries or damage were reported.

 

Isolated attacks are probably the future of this conflict. I don't think that carrier based fighter aircraft have counter-battery fire capability. So, if a local Houthi commander wheels out a ballistic missile and fires it, he won't be bombed, DoD would likely just hit a random target in response.

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

As for issuing new sanctions, are there any serious ones left for the US to invoke? After the previous administration not only pulled out of the nuclear agreement with Iran, but made it virtually impossible for any business interests in the West to legitimately do business with Iran, they pretty much removed all incentives for Iran to cooperate with the west. And once the agreement fell apart, it vitiated the status of the moderates in the Iranian government who had staked their hopes and reputations on the agreement.

As for China, it's not so much about imports as it is about exports. China's economy is hugely reliant on exports to the west. Its economy is already in big trouble. A crimp in its exports would be especially damaging now.

If China were to lose its Middle Eastern oil there might not be much energy left to produce sorely needed exports. Rather doubt it if Russian oil could make up the loss.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1310953/oil-imports-by-country-china/

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Is-China-Overly-Reliant-On-Middle-Easter-Oil.html

I mentioned sanctions on Yemen, not Iran, albeit some may be tied to Iran.  The U.S. is imposing sanctions on the Houthi's key financiers. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

US fighter aircraft shot down an anti-ship cruise missile fired at a Navy destroyer in the Red Sea from a Houthi-controlled area of Yemen on Sunday. No injuries or damage were reported.

 

Isolated attacks are probably the future of this conflict. I don't think that carrier based fighter aircraft have counter-battery fire capability. So, if a local Houthi commander wheels out a ballistic missile and fires it, he won't be bombed, DoD would likely just hit a random target in response.

 

Not yet.  Supposedly the U.S. Navy is in the final stages of testing their newly developed counter-battery fire system. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what they are, get them on the list.

 

Britain urged to designate Houthi rebels as terrorists

The Houthis, who are trained and funded by the IRGC, the Iranian regime’s military wing, declared war on Israel after the October 7 attacks.
Yesterday they published videos of training exercises including storming Israeli settlements, much like Hamas in Gaza. The Houthis have in the past been accused of training child soldiers and using civilians as human shields against airstrikes.

https://archive.ph/HjPxx

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/01/14/britain-urged-to-proscribe-houthi-rebels-as-terrorists/

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Why would they? Are they israeli warships? Did israel even join the coalition?

what's your point?

 

The Houthis seem reduced to pinprick attacks now. They may not have intelligence capabilities to know who they are attacking.

 

Bottom line: randomly attacking international shipping is for idiots.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

what's your point?

 

The Houthis seem reduced to pinprick attacks now. They may not have intelligence capabilities to know who they are attacking.

 

Bottom line: randomly attacking international shipping is for idiots.

Depends on what the goal is. Why do you think the Houthis are attacking ships?

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

what's your point?

 

The Houthis seem reduced to pinprick attacks now. They may not have intelligence capabilities to know who they are attacking.

 

Bottom line: randomly attacking international shipping is for idiots.

Well, they attacked an American ship, but that is expected after America bombed them. The UK can also expect retaliation. So much for not wanting to expand the Gaza war.

 

Isn't there an on line site that tracks all the ships in the whole world? I imagine there would be.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Well, they attacked an American ship, but that is expected after America bombed them. The UK can also expect retaliation. So much for not wanting to expand the Gaza war.

 

Isn't there an on line site that tracks all the ships in the whole world? I imagine there would be.

There is a marine tracking system called AIS, which is used for tracking ships. I suspect ships passing near Yemen turn off their AIS.

 

This raises the question of how the Houthis are tracking ships over the horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Well, they attacked an American ship, but that is expected after America bombed them. The UK can also expect retaliation. So much for not wanting to expand the Gaza war.

 

Isn't there an on line site that tracks all the ships in the whole world? I imagine there would be.

There is a marine tracking system called AIS, which is used for tracking ships. I suspect ships passing near Yemen turn off their AIS.

 

This raises the question of how the Houthis are tracking ships over the horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The Houthis may well calculate that, having withstood seven years of Saudi aerial bombardment over the course of the Yemeni civil war, it’s unlikely that a U.S. air assault on Yemeni targets would inflict more substantial damage or that any damage to its equipment or facilities could not be quickly repaired or replaced,” observed Gerald Feierstein, a former U.S. ambassador in Yemen.

“Moreover, a U.S. (or other) attack on Houthi military targets would validate, from the Houthi perspective, their propaganda that they are fighting on the front lines in support of Palestinians and that their operations are succeeding in threatening U.S. and allied interests,” he added.

Indeed, the Gaza war and its repercussions, noted the International Crisis Group, have “provided the Houthis with an opportunity to deflect mounting public pressure over their governance practices in the areas under their control, and enabled them to quell opposition to their rule by arresting opponents in those areas on charges of collusion with Israel and the U.S.”

https://archive.ph/Cew6z

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/01/16/houthi-yemen-red-sea-strikes-what-gained-won/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&utm_campaign=wp_todays_worldview

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Info from the Iranian Spy Satellite perhaps and a few other sources!

 

Khayyam satellite - Wikipedia

This satellite is insufficient to track ships passing through a small area. The satellite is in a sun-sychronous orbit, which means it follows the terminator between sunrise/sunset (or vice versa). So if a ship is traveling at night, or mid-day, the satellite can't see it.

 

I'm not sure if the Iranians have a global tracking ground station network, and if not, even if the satellite were passing over a ship in the Red Sea, Iran might not know.

 

Iran could put a ground station in Yemen, but the US would probably knock that out first.

 

Update: Iran says that it inly has ground stations in Iran, and that the satellite is only used over Iran.

 

Edited by Danderman123
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, placeholder said:

“The Houthis may well calculate that, having withstood seven years of Saudi aerial bombardment over the course of the Yemeni civil war, it’s unlikely that a U.S. air assault on Yemeni targets would inflict more substantial damage or that any damage to its equipment or facilities could not be quickly repaired or replaced,” observed Gerald Feierstein, a former U.S. ambassador in Yemen.

“Moreover, a U.S. (or other) attack on Houthi military targets would validate, from the Houthi perspective, their propaganda that they are fighting on the front lines in support of Palestinians and that their operations are succeeding in threatening U.S. and allied interests,” he added.

Indeed, the Gaza war and its repercussions, noted the International Crisis Group, have “provided the Houthis with an opportunity to deflect mounting public pressure over their governance practices in the areas under their control, and enabled them to quell opposition to their rule by arresting opponents in those areas on charges of collusion with Israel and the U.S.”

https://archive.ph/Cew6z

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/01/16/houthi-yemen-red-sea-strikes-what-gained-won/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&utm_campaign=wp_todays_worldview

As I mentioned in a previous post, besides aerial attacks and financial sanctions the U.S. is also attempting to stem the flow of Iranian weapons components to the Houthis.

https://www.aol.com/2-missing-navy-seals-were-155200542.html

 

Notice the photos of items seized.

Edited by Hawaiian
Additional comment.
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

You seem unaware of maritime insurance costs.

That affects all shipping, not just oil tankers.

 

End the Gaza conflict and the Houthi problem ends. Seems the Americans are unable to do that, despite them having the means to do so.

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

You seem unaware of maritime insurance costs.

Bloomberg is reporting that insurance carriers are considering withdrawing coverage for shipping in the Red Sea.

NOTE: Not furnishing link because it has a paywall.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:thumbsup: 

 

Biden admin to relist Houthis as specially designated global terrorists – source

 

The Biden administration was expected to announce plans to relist Houthi rebels as specially designated global terrorists, a US official tells Reuters.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/biden-admin-to-relist-houthis-as-specially-designated-global-terrorists-source/

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

31 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Bloomberg is reporting that insurance carriers are considering withdrawing coverage for shipping in the Red Sea.

NOTE: Not furnishing link because it has a paywall.

The upper link will take you there.

https://archive.ph/Kvojt

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-16/insurers-seek-to-exclude-us-uk-ships-from-red-sea-cover?embedded-checkout=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...