Jump to content

Historians rank Trump as worst president


Social Media

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dolf said:

If a historian can't read the statistics on the border chaos which is the worst ever then their opinions are not worth anything. Historians usually don't study economics either. A History degree and an Economics degree are two separate things. 

 

 

I will give you this. Trump supporters miss no opportunity to display their ignorance!!

 

Historians study history.   History is everything that happened in the past. 

exactly what is it that think, historians do? 

   Did you know that there are historians who specialize in a historical period, or a particular  subject.

economics of a particular period being one of many?. 

   Do you know that there are Presidential historians who as the name implies specialise in the study of......???

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sirineou said:

I will give you this. Trump supporters miss no opportunity to display their ignorance!!

 

Historians study history.   History is everything that happened in the past. 

exactly what is it that think, historians do? 

   Did you know that there are historians who specialize in a historical period, or a particular  subject.

economics of a particular period being one of many?. 

   Do you know that there are Presidential historians who as the name implies specialise in the study of......???

 

I can't give you much credit given your answer is so poorly written. Study history? What does that mean in context? Reading newspaper articles? Reading what? What are they studying?

 

Most historians know nothing about economics and are left leaning.

 

 

Edited by Dolf
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Most have degrees in pol science and history I believe. Presidents aren't economists. Some of them listen to economists.

So left leaning people.

  • Confused 2
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

Hardly a ringing endorsement, and definitely premature.  From your link:

 

"The Wall Street Journal asked 68 business, financial and academic economists who was responsible for the strengthening of the economy, and most “suggested Mr. Trump’s election deserves at least some credit” for the upturn. "

 

This was an opinion piece from Jan 14, 2018, less than a full year before Trump took office and before the consequences of his tax cuts, tariffs, covid mismanagement, etc. made there downsides known.

Hey Bruce  he doesn't read the articles.  He just comments on them.    if anyone cares to read the article it's a complete biased hit piece    long on personal attacks  and short on statistics  .Here is the author  Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim & Company. For 15 years, she has been a columnist for The Fiscal Times, Fox News, the New York Sun and numerous other organizations.

Edited by charleskerins
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dolf said:

That was a wall street journal survey of professional economic forecasters.  Those kind of economists work for private businesses. Not exactly an impartial bunch. And those economists predicted a long term boost to GDP for several years from the tax cuts. That never happened. GDP rose 2.2% in 2017, 2.9% in 2018 and 2.3% in 2019. 

And as one economist remarkked:

“We have to be cautious about giving Trump too much credit for the economy’s strength,” said Bernard Baumohl of the Economic Outlook Group. “Job creation and business capital spending were on the rise prior to his presidency. The jury is still out how much more his actions moved the economy forward.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/economists-credit-trump-as-tailwind-for-u-s-growth-hiring-and-stocks-1515682893

Edited by placeholder
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dolf said:

I can't you much credit given your answer is so poorly written. Study history? What does that mean in context? Reading newspaper articles? Reading what? What are they studying?

 

Most historians know nothing about economics and are left leaning.

 

 

Charles a Beard  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

Hey Bruce  he doesn't read the articles.  He just comments on them.         He posted an article about Trump being better and the guy wasn't even president yet.

I think it is time to stop feeding this TROLL and stop responding to it.

If it gets no responses it will hopefully go the same way as his previous avatar(s)

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, charleskerins said:

Net worth as a human being   much higher.

By what measures? Being a Biden troll? Posting nasty comments about Trump? That's a low character life. 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

That was a wall street journal survey of professional economic forecasters.  Those kind of economists work for private businesses. Not exactly an impartial bunch. And those economists predicted a long term boost to GDP for several years from the tax cuts. That never happened. GDP rose 2.2% in 2017, 2.9% in 2018 and 2.3% in 2019. 

And as one economist remarkked:

“We have to be cautious about giving Trump too much credit for the economy’s strength,” said Bernard Baumohl of the Economic Outlook Group. “Job creation and business capital spending were on the rise prior to his presidency. The jury is still out how much more his actions moved the economy forward.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/economists-credit-trump-as-tailwind-for-u-s-growth-hiring-and-stocks-1515682893

So he did a steady job not a bad job. Didn't start any wars, secured the borders, wages rose and the cost of living was under control.

 

So he wasn't bad at all. 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sirineou said:

I will give you this. Trump supporters miss no opportunity to display their ignorance!!

 

Historians study history.   History is everything that happened in the past. 

exactly what is it that think, historians do? 

   Did you know that there are historians who specialize in a historical period, or a particular  subject.

economics of a particular period being one of many?. 

   Do you know that there are Presidential historians who as the name implies specialise in the study of......???

 

How are people supposed to read these rambles? 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dolf said:

What did you study? Probably not English.

You wrote in criticizing my writing 

"16 minutes ago, Dolf said:  I can't you much credit given 

:clap2::laugh::cheesy:

Edited by sirineou
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

That was a wall street journal survey of professional economic forecasters.  Those kind of economists work for private businesses. Not exactly an impartial bunch.

Actually the heritage foundation found that all the best presidents were all republicans. 

Imagine that, what are the chances :laugh:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Historians study history.   History is everything that happened in the past. 

So they study wages, inflation and the stock market? Yes or no?

 

Did they study illegal immigration? Yes or no?

 

You claim they study "everything" yet can't name the things they studied.

 

Sorry to tell you this but nobody studies everything.

 

Being a Biden troll must be a land of make believe. Historians are studying everything. That's just hilarious.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Is there an adult in the room to talk to? 

Thanks for all your time fighting the Marxist Historian narrative! Imop

 

Appreciate your efforts !

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Actually the heritage foundation found that all the best presidents were all republicans. 

Imagine that, what are the chances :laugh:

Did they not study everything?:laugh:

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, riclag said:

Thanks for all your time fighting the Marxist Historian narrative! Imop

 

Appreciate your efforts !

 

 

 

 

Not difficult to prove these people wrong. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Is there an adult in the room to talk to? 

Dude you criticized my writing skills with a poorly constructed sentence  .

You said "   I can't you much credit given "

If you are going to criticize someone's writing, have the intelligence to at least proofs your own copy. 

and then just google what it is that historian do. 

And please, please, don't go playing  grab ass, and then go crying when someone grabs your ass. 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...