Jump to content

Pride flags would be largely banned Tennessee classrooms in bill advanced by GOP lawmakers


Social Media

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Hummin said:

When flagging rainbow colours becomes a problem or a matter of larger public opinion, where it should be allowed or not! 

 

Before all the politics, Rainbow colours represented hope, freedom and happiness with no ties or ownership, and no problem with any gender or sexuality who want to use the rainbow colours or sumbol, it is the activism it have turned in to. 

 

Schools are for learning. The existence of gay people is not in contention. Nor is public intolerance for then in TN. Raising awareness and empathy for gay people would be considered appropriate in any sane state or country. Raindow flags don't turn kids gay. Explain what adverse affects could potentially arise from the display of those flags. Is is not activism. Gay hate is a major problem for gay people. Educators are aware of the issue. The good 'ol boys in TN not so much. Meanwhile, displaying confederate flags everywhere and naming schools after traitors seems not to be an issue.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only 2 flags that belong in a classroom are the US flag, and MAYBE a state flag. 

 

Otherwise, where do you draw the line?  Maybe a MAGA flag?  (that would cause exploding heads)  Or how about an Israeli flag, or a Palestinian flag?  Or, down south, a confederate flag?  Or whatever cause de jour...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, impulse said:

The only 2 flags that belong in a classroom are the US flag, and MAYBE a state flag. 

 

Otherwise, where do you draw the line?  Maybe a MAGA flag?  (that would cause exploding heads)  Or how about an Israeli flag, or a Palestinian flag?  Or, down south, a confederate flag?  Or whatever cause de jour...

 

 

Did you imagine that they would be a permanent fixture or an educational campaign to raise awareness of bigotry?

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Did you imagine that they would be a permanent fixture or an educational campaign to raise awareness of bigotry?

 

It doesn't matter.  If you allow pride flags, you have to allow MAGA flags.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It doesn't matter.  If you allow pride flags, you have to allow MAGA flags.

 

Haven't you just acknowledged that MAGA is anti-LGBT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It doesn't matter.  If you allow pride flags, you have to allow MAGA flags.

 

 

Politics in a school room? Is that appropriate do you think? It wasn't when I went to school. Not a peep all the way through 12 years.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

Politics in a school room? Is that appropriate do you think? It wasn't when I went to school. Not a peep all the way through 12 years.

That explains a lot. Every year I can remember at least a couple of classes had some political discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jak2002003 said:

I just do not know where to start to answer your astonishingly ignorant and misguided questions.... So I won't. 

Of course, the left's typical "there are so many reasons that I am not able to come up with one" response.

13 hours ago, jak2002003 said:

How on earth you could think a rainbow flag is sexualising children is beyond me. 

I just do not know where to start to answer your astonishingly ignorant and misguided questions.... So I won't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, impulse said:

The only 2 flags that belong in a classroom are the US flag, and MAYBE a state flag. 

 

Otherwise, where do you draw the line?  Maybe a MAGA flag?  (that would cause exploding heads)  Or how about an Israeli flag, or a Palestinian flag?  Or, down south, a confederate flag?  Or whatever cause de jour...

 

I think it depends entirely on the academic context.

For example in a classroom teaching Spanish, I think displaying the flags of all the Spanish speaking nations including the USA would be both conducive to learning and charming.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I think it depends entirely on the academic context.

For example in a classroom teaching Spanish, I think displaying the flags of all the Spanish speaking nations including the USA would be both conducive to learning and charming.

Do they still teach geography in US public schools? If so, flags from every country would be appropriate, along with a line or two about the meaning of each. 

 

What might they be teaching in grade school that a gay pride flag would be appropriate in the classroom? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Do they still teach geography in US public schools? If so, flags from every country would be appropriate, along with a line or two about the meaning of each. 

 

What might they be teaching in grade school that a gay pride flag would be appropriate in the classroom? 

I already addressed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

Politics in a school room? Is that appropriate do you think? It wasn't when I went to school. Not a peep all the way through 12 years.

 

You know what wasn't in the classroom when I was a kid?

 

Pornographic illustration books promoting anal sex, oral sex, and masterbation.

 

Or storytime from a man in a g-string and twerk shows.

 

And schools didn't have a policy to keep secrets from the parents about a child's gender dysmorphia, orientation, mental health and well being.

 

Heaven forbid, if the parents found out they might take their child to speak to a therapist, rather than a surgeon.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FruitPudding said:

 

You know what wasn't in the classroom when I was a kid?

 

Pornographic illustration books promoting anal sex, oral sex, and masterbation.

 

Or storytime from a man in a g-string and twerk shows.

 

And schools didn't have a policy to keep secrets from the parents about a child's gender dysmorphia, orientation, mental health and well being.

 

Heaven forbid, if the parents found out they might take their child to speak to a therapist, rather than a surgeon.


100% correct!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, G_Money said:


Appears the lefts new code word for pedophile is MAPS (Minor Attracted Persons).

 

Read the link!

What does pedophile mean? 😀 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, G_Money said:

It’s all the link.

OK, I reply for you as it seems you don't like questions.

 

"a person who is sexually attracted to children"

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/paedophile

 

So it's the same as MAP. Right-wingers are so stupid. They don't know what pedophile means! 😀

Actually MAP is more precise because "minor" refers to a legally defined age. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, candide said:

OK, I reply for you as it seems you don't like questions.

 

"a person who is sexually attracted to children"

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/paedophile

 

So it's the same as MAP. Right-wingers are so stupid. They don't know what pedophile means! 😀

Actually MAP is more precise because "minor" refers to a legally defined age. 

I think pedophile (or paedophile depending on where you are from) refers more specifically to creeps that are sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Sadly, the left is so stupid it has become common to use it to describe anyone sexually attracted to a minor, so per your definition, anyone attracted to a 17-year-old, would be a pedophile.

 

Being sexually attracted to children is not illegal, but adult having sex with a child/minor would legally be a child molester. In the event the victim was a prepubescent child/minor, the perpetrator would be a child molester (a crime) and a pedophile. (not a crime) 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

I think pedophile (or paedophile depending on where you are from) refers more specifically to creeps that are sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Sadly, the left is so stupid it has become common to use it to describe anyone sexually attracted to a minor, so per your definition, anyone attracted to a 17-year-old, would be a pedophile.

 

Being sexually attracted to children is not illegal, but adult having sex with a child/minor would legally be a child molester. In the event the victim was a prepubescent child/minor, the perpetrator would be a child molester (a crime) and a pedophile. (not a crime) 

 

 

I don't disagree with you (except your claim about the left-wing). Minor attracted is broader as it also  includes young teenagers.

However, you should explain it to your pal G_Money, not to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, candide said:

OK, I reply for you as it seems you don't like questions.

 

"a person who is sexually attracted to children"

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/paedophile

 

So it's the same as MAP. Right-wingers are so stupid. They don't know what pedophile means! 😀

Actually MAP is more precise because "minor" refers to a legally defined age. 

 

But why make it sound like it's normal, rather than a sickness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:

 

But why make it sound like it's normal, rather than a sickness?

Why do you claim it makes it sound normal? It makes sense for a  congressman to use a more precise expression referring to a legally defined age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

You know what wasn't in the classroom when I was a kid?

 

Pornographic illustration books promoting anal sex, oral sex, and masterbation.

 

Or storytime from a man in a g-string and twerk shows.

 

And schools didn't have a policy to keep secrets from the parents about a child's gender dysmorphia, orientation, mental health and well being.

 

Heaven forbid, if the parents found out they might take their child to speak to a therapist, rather than a surgeon.

 

Good, lets go back to the 1950's when your ignorance of social issues was normal. You are hallucinating if you think those things are systemic in our educational system beyond sometimes campaigns like rainbow flags specifically designed to blow maga minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...