Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

NY judge issues gag order on Trump in hush money trial

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, candide said:

 

 

I'll just see it as it will be decided in court....

About the tape, you can check in the same source you got the sentence you wrote from.... 😁

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trumps-alleged-hush-money-payments-path-criminal-charges-2023-03-30/

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyways. 

  • Replies 326
  • Views 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Good hold that fraud to the standard that any American citizen is held to if you or I ran our mouth like trump does the very least the law would do is lock us up,most likely a good (as$) beating to go

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    There is no first amendment right to threaten others.   Trump is free to talk about millions of things, including DA Bragg and the judge himself.   What may not do is threaten, int

  • The judge is doing Cash Crunch donny a favor.  Did you watch his presser after the Monday hearing?  Whackadoodle donny!   From his presser:   "You can't have an election in the mid

Posted Images

13 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I am noting that Clarence Thomas benefits from his judicial decions far more than Judge Merchan. 

How? 

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyways. 

The tape is mentioned.

8 minutes ago, candide said:

The tape is mentioned.

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyway.

  • Popular Post
34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyway.

 

 

enjoy

11 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I want to know how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

Apparently you don't know. 

12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

 

 

enjoy

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

35 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

This, and also the corroborating testimonies under oath are better than the evidence you have brought up so far to support your claims, that is zero evidence!! 😃

6 minutes ago, candide said:

This, and also the corroborating testimonies under oath are better than the evidence you have brought up so far to support your claims, that is zero evidence!! 😃

What claims am I trying to support? 

21 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What claims am I trying to support? 

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?

7 minutes ago, candide said:

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?


I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

9 minutes ago, candide said:

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 

1 minute ago, rudi49jr said:


I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

I think it safe to say you will not be providing any examples of the false claims you are accusing me of making. 

 

Weak

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:


I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

Dolf is not Yellowtail. Quite different trolling styles. Dolf is the former Bignok.

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 


Maybe this will jog your memory:

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-arraignment-hush-money-81225510ef7638494852816878f612f0

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I want to know how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

Apparently you don't know. 

Clarence Thomas receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 

The breaking the law part was claiming the payments were business related, and thus tax deductible.

 

Perhaps I could claim my Pattaya expenses are business related.

  • Popular Post
5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

The trial is coming, watch and learn.

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Clarence Thomas receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

But the question was how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

If you don't know, just say you don't know, don't just keep saying it. 

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

The breaking the law part was claiming the payments were business related, and thus tax deductible.

So, you don't know what law was broken either. 

 

If he was attempting to deduct the payment illegally, why would he not be prosecuted for tax evasion?  

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Perhaps I could claim my Pattaya expenses are business related.

You really understand nothing about this, do you? 

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But the question was how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

If you don't know, just say you don't know, don't just keep saying it. 

Perhaps if I type slowly, you will understand.

 

Clarence Thomas makes judicial decisions that favor the Koch donor network. In return, he receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't know what law was broken either. 

 

 

Here's a hint for you:

 

When Trump was indicted, a charging document was issued. This contains the actual statutes broken by Trump. 

 

I realize that you have an urge to troll, but the fact that I personally do not know the statutes cited in the charging document does not exonerate Trump.

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Perhaps if I type slowly, you will understand.

 

Clarence Thomas makes judicial decisions that favor the Koch donor network. In return, he receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

For example? 

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Here's a hint for you:

 

When Trump was indicted, a charging document was issued. This contains the actual statutes broken by Trump. 

 

I realize that you have an urge to troll, but the fact that I personally do not know the statutes cited in the charging document does not exonerate Trump.

Trump is alleged to have broken, you sound like the judge.

 

So now you admit you don't know what the charges, you were just pretending to know, that's what I thought. 

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump is alleged to have broken, you sound like the judge.

 

So now you admit you don't know what the charges, you were just pretending to know, that's what I thought. 

You are correct, I have not memorized the 31 felony charges against Trump in the hush money case.

 

Meanwhile, the trial date of April 15 approaches.

13 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are correct, I have not memorized the 31 felony charges against Trump in the hush money case.

That's easy. They are all the same:

 

Charges: Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

 

https://manhattanda.org/district-attorney-bragg-announces-34-count-felony-indictment-of-former-president-donald-j-trump/#:~:text=Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L,and after the 2016 election.

On 3/31/2024 at 10:56 AM, candide said:

That's exactly what he's trying to do. Provoke the judge in order to induce an excessive reaction which he can appeal (and whine about it politically).

But I think the judge is too smart to fall into this trap.

The judge may merely sentence Trump to imprisonment within the standard sentencing guidelines, which would obviate that particular legal avenue.

 

Trump will appeal, no matter what, unless he is acquitted.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

That's easy. They are all the same:

 

Charges: Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

 

https://manhattanda.org/district-attorney-bragg-announces-34-count-felony-indictment-of-former-president-donald-j-trump/#:~:text=Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L,and after the 2016 election.


That may be, but each count of falsifying business records, a felony, is punishable by up to four years in prison. You do the math.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.