NY judge issues gag order on Trump in hush money trial

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, candide said:

 

 

I'll just see it as it will be decided in court....

About the tape, you can check in the same source you got the sentence you wrote from.... 😁

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trumps-alleged-hush-money-payments-path-criminal-charges-2023-03-30/

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyways. 

[Yellowtail]

13 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I am noting that Clarence Thomas benefits from his judicial decions far more than Judge Merchan. 

How? 

[candide]

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyways. 

The tape is mentioned.

Edited April 5 by candide

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, candide said:

The tape is mentioned.

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyway.

[Danderman123]

50 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How? 

Clarence Thomas has secretly participated in events for the Koch donor network for at least a decade, despite the fact that the group has brought cases before the Supreme Court, according to a bombshell new ProPublica report.

 

Do you need a list of benefits accruing to Thomas from the Koch donor network?

[Danderman123]

34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't have a link to the recoding, I didn't think so. Thanks anyway.

 

 

enjoy

[Yellowtail]

11 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Clarence Thomas has secretly participated in events for the Koch donor network for at least a decade, despite the fact that the group has brought cases before the Supreme Court, according to a bombshell new ProPublica report.

 

Do you need a list of benefits accruing to Thomas from the Koch donor network?

I want to know how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

Apparently you don't know. 

[Yellowtail]

12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

 

 

enjoy

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

[candide]

35 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

This, and also the corroborating testimonies under oath are better than the evidence you have brought up so far to support your claims, that is zero evidence!! 😃

[Yellowtail]

6 minutes ago, candide said:

This, and also the corroborating testimonies under oath are better than the evidence you have brought up so far to support your claims, that is zero evidence!! 😃

What claims am I trying to support? 

[candide]

21 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What claims am I trying to support? 

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?

[rudi49jr]

7 minutes ago, candide said:

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?

I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

[Yellowtail]

9 minutes ago, candide said:

Weren't you claiming that Trump did not direct Cohen?

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, rudi49jr said:

I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

I think it safe to say you will not be providing any examples of the false claims you are accusing me of making. 

 

Weak

[candide]

5 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

I think Dolf, I mean Yellowtail, sometimes has trouble keeping track of all the (false) claims and other assorted hogwash he posts. 

Dolf is not Yellowtail. Quite different trolling styles. Dolf is the former Bignok.

[rudi49jr]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 

Maybe this will jog your memory:

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-arraignment-hush-money-81225510ef7638494852816878f612f0

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I want to know how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

Apparently you don't know. 

Clarence Thomas receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

[Danderman123]

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, you apparently have me confused. 

 

It's my position that it is a made-up crime. 

 

What law might he have broken by banging a porn actress and paying her to sign an NDA that she reneged on? 

The breaking the law part was claiming the payments were business related, and thus tax deductible.

 

Perhaps I could claim my Pattaya expenses are business related.

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Unverified recoding. 

 

stinky sauce

The trial is coming, watch and learn.

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Clarence Thomas receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

But the question was how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

If you don't know, just say you don't know, don't just keep saying it. 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

The breaking the law part was claiming the payments were business related, and thus tax deductible.

So, you don't know what law was broken either. 

 

If he was attempting to deduct the payment illegally, why would he not be prosecuted for tax evasion?  

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Perhaps I could claim my Pattaya expenses are business related.

You really understand nothing about this, do you? 

[Danderman123]

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But the question was how Clarence Thomas is directly benefiting from his judicial decisions. 

 

If you don't know, just say you don't know, don't just keep saying it. 

Perhaps if I type slowly, you will understand.

 

Clarence Thomas makes judicial decisions that favor the Koch donor network. In return, he receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

[Danderman123]

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So, you don't know what law was broken either. 

 

 

Here's a hint for you:

 

When Trump was indicted, a charging document was issued. This contains the actual statutes broken by Trump. 

 

I realize that you have an urge to troll, but the fact that I personally do not know the statutes cited in the charging document does not exonerate Trump.

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Perhaps if I type slowly, you will understand.

 

Clarence Thomas makes judicial decisions that favor the Koch donor network. In return, he receives significant benefits from the Koch donor network.

For example? 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Here's a hint for you:

 

When Trump was indicted, a charging document was issued. This contains the actual statutes broken by Trump. 

 

I realize that you have an urge to troll, but the fact that I personally do not know the statutes cited in the charging document does not exonerate Trump.

Trump is alleged to have broken, you sound like the judge.

 

So now you admit you don't know what the charges, you were just pretending to know, that's what I thought. 

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump is alleged to have broken, you sound like the judge.

 

So now you admit you don't know what the charges, you were just pretending to know, that's what I thought. 

You are correct, I have not memorized the 31 felony charges against Trump in the hush money case.

 

Meanwhile, the trial date of April 15 approaches.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

For example? 

For over 20 years, Clarence Thomas has been treated to luxury vacations by billionaire Republican donor Harlan Crow.

 

Key examples of Justice Thomas’s corruption that necessitate his resignation: 

 

Thomas has allegedly repeatedly violated federal law by failing to disclose luxury trips, gifts, and business transactions with billionaire benefactors who had business before the Court.

 

Thomas has secretly helped fundraise for the Koch dark money network.

 

Thomas has refused to recuse from January 6th-related Supreme Court cases even though his wife, Ginni Thomas, was a target of investigations.

 

Ginni Thomas has received huge sums of money from Leonard Leo’s dark money network in their work to capture the judiciary. Justice Thomas has failed to disclose his wife’s income and its sources.

[jerrymahoney]

13 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are correct, I have not memorized the 31 felony charges against Trump in the hush money case.

That's easy. They are all the same:

 

Charges: Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

 

https://manhattanda.org/district-attorney-bragg-announces-34-count-felony-indictment-of-former-president-donald-j-trump/#:~:text=Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L,and after the 2016 election.

Edited April 6 by jerrymahoney

[Danderman123]

On 3/31/2024 at 10:56 AM, candide said:

That's exactly what he's trying to do. Provoke the judge in order to induce an excessive reaction which he can appeal (and whine about it politically).

But I think the judge is too smart to fall into this trap.

The judge may merely sentence Trump to imprisonment within the standard sentencing guidelines, which would obviate that particular legal avenue.

 

Trump will appeal, no matter what, unless he is acquitted.

[rudi49jr]

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

That's easy. They are all the same:

 

Charges: Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, 34 counts

 

https://manhattanda.org/district-attorney-bragg-announces-34-count-felony-indictment-of-former-president-donald-j-trump/#:~:text=Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L,and after the 2016 election.

That may be, but each count of falsifying business records, a felony, is punishable by up to four years in prison. You do the math.