Donald Trump hush money trial, explained

[Danderman123]

11 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

Tug - You are always on the wrong side of what is really happening, just like your Dear Leader Biden has been on the wrong side of history for over 40 years.  He has made the world much more unsafe that what it was 3 years ago.  Trump signed non-disclosure agreements with these women.  This is done every day in America by individuals and companies.  The name Non-disclosure agreement was not sounding sinister enough that 3 or 4 other DAs and other people who looked at this and walked away from it.  Then Alvin Bragg decided who would try a different approach on this.  He decided to call this "hush money" payments.  This made this sound more sinister and ran with it.  So now we have a hole change of Democrat hacks from DA Bragg up to the corrupt AG Garland.  Trump can not receive a fair trail in NY.  Just like Climate Change.  Global cooling did not catch on.  Global warming did not catch on as terms, but Climate Change was the term that worked and now is used exclusively.  Non-disclosure agreements are not illegal.  But ill informed people like you get a kick out of everything that is against Trump.  

Sounds like the usual rant from @illisdean.

 

Whatever point you were trying to make was buried in your Gish Gallop of fantasies. Here's a pointer for you:

 

Don't bring in claims from unrelated issues when you make a post: if someone agrees with you on your initial point, you might lose them on the unrelated points that you threw in. Adding in unrelated stuff makes you look like a crazy ranter, which I am sure is not your objective.

 

I haven't seen

@illisdean post since Truth Social started to crash. I hope he didn't buy too much of that dog.

Edited April 16 by Danderman123

[Skipalongcassidy]

24 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Sounds like the usual rant from @illisdean.

 

Whatever point you were trying to make was buried in your Gish Gallop of fantasies. Here's a pointer for you:

 

Don't bring in claims from unrelated issues when you make a post: if someone agrees with you on your initial point, you might lose them on the unrelated points that you threw in. Adding in unrelated stuff makes you look like a crazy ranter, which I am sure is not your objective.

 

I haven't seen

@illisdean post since Truth Social started to crash. I hope he didn't buy too much of that dog.

Giving advice on rants... how appropriate from the hateful.

[Danderman123]

32 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Giving advice on rants... how appropriate from the hateful.

Getting back to the topic, do you think that Trump should have allowed Stormy Daniels to tell her story before the 2016 election?

 

Don't you think the voters should know the facts before voting?

[Skipalongcassidy]

20 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Getting back to the topic, do you think that Trump should have allowed Stormy Daniels to tell her story before the 2016 election?

 

Don't you think the voters should know the facts before voting?

Yes... and the Hunter Biden laptop information should have been made available also... correct???

[Danderman123]

2 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Yes... and the Hunter Biden laptop information should have been made available also... correct???

As it was.

 

Published all over the place.

[Skipalongcassidy]

33 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

As it was.

 

Published all over the place.

But withheld until after the election... just like trump not wanting stormy story to come out prior to the election... 

[Danderman123]

3 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

But withheld until after the election... just like trump not wanting stormy story to come out prior to the election... 

You are gaslighting us.

 

Three weeks before the 2020 United States presidential election, the New York Post published a front-page story that presented emails from the laptop, alleging they showed corruption by Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee and Hunter Biden's father.

[Skipalongcassidy]

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are gaslighting us.

 

Three weeks before the 2020 United States presidential election, the New York Post published a front-page story that presented emails from the laptop, alleging they showed corruption by Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee and Hunter Biden's father.

Check the timeline again...  What you fail to comprehend is that the laptop and story behind it were available and covered up by the media since December of 2019... so who is gaslighting who?

[Danderman123]

45 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Check the timeline again...  What you fail to comprehend is that the laptop and story behind it were available and covered up by the media since December of 2019... so who is gaslighting who?

The laptop story was held back by the Trump campaign as an October surprise. Rudy Giuliani had access to the data, and could have released it at any time, but chose to wait.

 

[Skipalongcassidy]

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The laptop story was held back by the Trump campaign as an October surprise. Rudy Giuliani had access to the data, and could have released it at any time, but chose to wait.

 

So trump and rudy can stop the main stream media... interesting... hahahaha... just different motivations for holding back the information... neither of which was the right thing to do.

[Danderman123]

1 minute ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

So trump and rudy can stop the main stream media... interesting... hahahaha... just different motivations for holding back the information... neither of which was the right thing to do.

Trump did just that for the Stormy Daniels story.

 

You must have heard about that.

[Skipalongcassidy]

20 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump did just that for the Stormy Daniels story.

 

You must have heard about that.

I already agreed that he did... my question is why didn't the msm follow through with the story in the meantime... trump was holding back to reveal it in the last month leading to the election... the msm was holding back and trying to bury the story to protect joe... 

[Skipalongcassidy]

On 4/16/2024 at 9:33 AM, Danderman123 said:

Getting back to the topic, do you think that Trump should have allowed Stormy Daniels to tell her story before the 2016 election?

 

Don't you think the voters should know the facts before voting?

Former Attorney General Bill Barr slammed New York prosecutors for the "obviously political" Trump hush money case, calling it an "abomination" as jury selection continues in the landmark trial. 

Barr, who led the Department of Justice under former President Donald Trump, argued the case signals what the real threat to democracy is in his opinion — the "excesses of the progressive left."

 

"This case is an abomination," Barr said during "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday. "It's obviously political. Seven years after he pays hush money to try to come up with this case. It's also, as you say, it's not only far-fetched… they're trying to predicate it on a federal crime which wasn't prosecuted."